EVGA

1080 SC Performance

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
gregorskii
New Member
  • Total Posts : 16
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2018/03/08 20:14:00
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
2018/03/22 01:25:15 (permalink)
Hi there,
 
I have been scouring the web for an answer to my performance question.
 
I have a new 1080 SC ACX in a 8700k system and I am getting much lower 3dmark performance than I am finding online, and from a friend who has a SC2 system with a much slower processor.
 
Full specs:
 
Intel 8700k (clocked to 4.6GHZ)
ASRock z370 Taichi
Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB DDR4 3000 C15 (running at 3000)
1080 SC (clocked to 2088 5588)
3x Corsair MP NVME drives (240 boot, 480 storage, 240 linux)
Dark Rock 3 CPU cooler
NZXT s340 (back/ top NZXT aer 120 fans, 2x 140 Be Quiet Silent Wings 3 in front)
 
Some debug info:
 
IDLE GPU: 44c
MAX GPU: 65c
IDLE CPU: 27c
MAX CPU: 77c (4.6ghz)
GPUZ BUS SPEED: PCIe x16 3.0 @ x1 3.0
GPUZ BIOS: 86.04.60.00.80
NVIDIA DRIVERS: 391.24 (Geforce Experience Installed)
Windows 10: Fully up to date
XBOX DVR: OFF
 
My z370 does have the latest firmware, chipset drivers.
 
3dmark:
 
Time Spy: https : // www.3dmark.com/spy/3483545
FireStrike: https : // www. 3dmark.com/fs/15158921
 
More worrying than benchmarks is framerate. In Prey I can get as low as 30, average 45 in the main characters office @1440p. Sometimes hit 60 fps (vsync on).
Rise Of the Tomb Raider (benchmark attached) in geothermal valley regular play is 30-50 fps @1440p.
 
It seems that no matter what I enable in graphics settings (save hairworks in witcher) the FPS does not fluctuate much, it just struggles to keep 60 in certain situations and some frame slowness is noticeable while playing. I can even enable DSR 4x and on Prey it only has a few FPS drop.
 
My monitor is a 1440p Samsung 32 inch connected via display port. I have tried running the benchmarks on a 1080p TV to see if the display was somehow involved.
 
Am I going crazy or is a 3dmark score of 7k the most I can expect from my system? I would imaging it should be 7500+.
 
I have tried:
 
Reseating the card
Full driver reinstall with DDU in safemode
Max prerendered frames 1
Power Management Adaptive and performance
Power management link state power management off
Processor power management min/max 100%
NVIDIA control panel debug mode (decreased score to 6500)
 
Pretty much tried everything the internet has to offer.
 
The last two things I have not tried are using a different PCIe port, my mobo top two slots will run at x16, but the manual prefers top slot, and switching the vbios to the backup.
 
Thanks

Attached Image(s)

#1

33 Replies Related Threads

    herocrusher
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 234
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/03/27 20:25:52
    • Location: Utah
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 2
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 02:00:04 (permalink)
    Just curious...
     
    Are you using EVGA precision to see what your GPU and memory clocks are hitting?
     
    and is the card hitting 99 - 100% load?

     "All your base are belonging to us!"
    #2
    QuintLeo
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 946
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2016/04/16 23:05:09
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 04:23:58 (permalink)
    A lot of folks that post 3dMark benchmarks have their cards seriously overclocked.
     

    Now that vorsholk has stopped his abuse, I'm returning to folding.
     I no longer MOO due to abuses by certain "whales" in the Gridcoin community - so I now work the Distributed.net project directly again.
     
    #3
    gregorskii
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/03/08 20:14:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 07:58:24 (permalink)
    @herocrusher yes, I use the precision oc, and NZXT cam, the card hits 100% when it needs to.

    @quitnoleo I mainly overclocked it to see how it would affect the score and game FPS. I have tried running it in debug mode (reference clock), card stock, and overclocked. FWIW the overclock on the card does not affect performance or score much, unless you go to debug mode, then the score drops by 600 points. It seems to be diminishing returns ( or marginal return ) to go over the already overclocked speeds of the SC. So long term I likely won’t overclock more than the stock overclock when I play games.

    From my understand these cards are designed to overclock. I did not up the vcore at all to hit these speeds, the card is stable with these frequencies.

    As I said above my main concern is game performance. The 3dMark score is here because it’s an easily transferable metric to determine the performance. I also saw before if EVGA responds they’d ask for it. So it’s there. I am not concerned mainly with the 3dMark score for the sake of it.

    There are tons of videos online with people getting +100 peak FPS 90fps overall in the tomb raider benchmark I included with the ftw and other 1080 cards.
    post edited by gregorskii - 2018/03/22 08:00:45
    #4
    bdary
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 10330
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/04/25 14:08:16
    • Location: Florida
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 116
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 08:52:51 (permalink)
    "In Prey I can get as low as 30, average 45 in the main characters office @1440p. Sometimes hit 60 fps (vsync on)."
     
    Just for the sake of further testing your issue, try playing this game without vsync and report back your FPS results.
    Also, did you use GFE to optimize your games?  If so, is there a setting to undo what it did?  (I don't use it so I don't know)


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    #5
    gregorskii
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/03/08 20:14:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 09:01:37 (permalink)
    I have tried with and without vsync, with and without optimizing. :/

    Pretty much tried everything. I have been researching and testing for a couple days now.
    #6
    bdary
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 10330
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/04/25 14:08:16
    • Location: Florida
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 116
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 09:09:24 (permalink)
    I didn't see your results for Prey without vsync.  Maybe I missed it.
    So is there a way to undo a game optimization or is still like the old days where you have to delete the games config file and let a new one be created to get rid of GFE's settings?


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    #7
    joeymir
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 732
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2007/04/09 16:45:56
    • Location: Oregon
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 4
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 09:12:31 (permalink)
    According to Guru3d a score of 7400 seems to be the norm, give or take. You scored 7200 and some change which seems pretty normal(and easy to make up a few hundred points in benchmark apps like Timespy). And in Guru3d's tests, they are running an 8 Core i7 5960X which is going to to score a little higher in synthetic benchmarks.
     
    But regarding your general performance, I WILL AGREE that seems very low, even at 1440p. I would be interested in seeing what happens if you disable vsync & DSR however. I'll give it some thought, and hopefully others will chime in as well. I am sure someone else on these forums is running a similar setup & plays Prey, so they can give you some relative performance comparisons. 
    edit: just to add, if possible try the card in another machine? It never hurts.
    Source: Guru3D

    Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master | Ryzen 9 5900X | 32GB Crucial Ballisitx DDR4 3600MHz | MSI Radeon 6900 XT | Samsung 950 Pro 512GB | 2x Crucial MX500 1TB Raid-0 | 2x WD Velociraptors 500GB Raid-0 | Seasonic Focus Platinum 850W | Lian-Li PC-O11

    #8
    gregorskii
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/03/08 20:14:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 09:15:50 (permalink)
    You can undo them. Without vsync it varies. The office is he same 40-45 FPS when looking at the main screen. In some areas it gets to 60-65 and some walls I look at can get as high as 140fps. But the average ends up being lower than 60.

    You can reset the game optimization. There is no optimization for 3dMark, and I tried prey without them.

    Prey is quite old, so it could be an engine / GPU mismatch. Tomb Raider is old as well.

    I have not tried any new games like D2 as I have it on ps4.

    From the looks of it does anyone think the scores and FPS are lower than they should be?

    What are similar 3dMark scores if anyone has them?

    Thanks all.
    #9
    gregorskii
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/03/08 20:14:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 09:18:48 (permalink)
    I was going to ask a friend if I could swap with his gigabyte 1080 for a night (odd request, but he might do it for the sake of science).

    I don’t have any other gaming pcs, save letting someone else I know who games use the card and bench it.

    I have tried disabling dsr and vsync. I only enabled dsr to see if I was hitting a top end limit on the card. It seems I am not. The more I throw at the card it seems to handle it without much frame drop, it’s just the normal frame rates that are low.
    #10
    Sajin
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 49165
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
    • Location: Texas, USA.
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 199
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 11:15:40 (permalink)
    Something is definitely off. Your fire strike graphics score is low. You're scoring what a stock 1080 founders edition card would score at stock settings. Is the card actually running at x16?
    #11
    gregorskii
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/03/08 20:14:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 11:32:26 (permalink)
    Per GPU z it is.
    #12
    bdary
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 10330
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/04/25 14:08:16
    • Location: Florida
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 116
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 12:05:59 (permalink)
    Just for comparison, here's my FS score with a stock 1080 FTW (no OC).  My core and mem clocks are running lower than yours and yet my GPU score is higher. >> http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9968111
     


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    #13
    gregorskii
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/03/08 20:14:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 12:43:31 (permalink)
    Yes. I appreciate the confirmation. It indeed looks like it’s runing lower.

    I am going to try some low level things today. My mobo has dual bios, I am going to try the other one.

    The card has dual vbios, I’ll try that.

    I have Linux as well, metro redux is cross platform. If Linux runs better it leads more into windows being the culprit (then I can fresh install).

    After that swapping cards for testing with my friend may be the next step.

    If the EVGA runs slower in his machine and mine I can try to RMA it.

    If anyone else has any suggestions keep them coming.

    I’ll report what I find on the other options later.

    Thank you all!
    #14
    bdary
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 10330
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/04/25 14:08:16
    • Location: Florida
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 116
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 14:21:37 (permalink)
    Sounds good, keep us posted...


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    #15
    gregorskii
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/03/08 20:14:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 15:39:35 (permalink)
    I think I found the culprit.
     
    http : //forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=8160&PID=48407&#48407
     
    Per my mobo manual I have it installed correctly, but the top slot is not giving the full performance. Per GPUz its only running at PCI "PCIe x16 3.0 @ 1x 3.0" in slot 1, "PCIe x16 3.0 @ 8x 3.0" in slot 2.
    #16
    Sajin
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 49165
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
    • Location: Texas, USA.
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 199
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 15:42:09 (permalink)
    =)
     
    Looks like I was right. Your card wasn't running at x16.
    #17
    gregorskii
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/03/08 20:14:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 16:22:40 (permalink)
    I don't quite understand the GPUz readings.
     
    "PCIe x16 3.0 @ 8x 3.0"
     
    The PCIe x16 3.0 means capable of x16 3.0, the @ "8x 3.0" means its running at what x8? It looks like right now its running at x8 not x16. So its still low?
     
    But why x1 in slot 1 before?
     
    New benchmarks:
     
    FS: https ://www.3dmark.com/fs/15169863
    TS: https ://www.3dmark.com/spy/3487475
     
    Tomb Raider FPS score was 90.
     
    I have heard even at x8 current video cards can't use up the full bandwidth, so x16 is kind of pointless. It looks like the second slot is running correctly at x8 but thats faster than x1 of the primary slot, hence the improvement.
     
    But why x1 in slot 1... :/ Guess thats for the ASRock forums.
    post edited by gregorskii - 2018/03/22 16:25:00
    #18
    Sajin
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 49165
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
    • Location: Texas, USA.
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 199
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 16:32:18 (permalink)
    Yep, "x8 3.0" means it's running at x8. The first slot may be running at x1 because of how many m.2 slots you're using, or the pcie2 link speed setting inside the bios is set incorrectly. The pcie2 link speed setting should be set to auto, or gen3, it's always best to manually set it to gen3 though as auto sometimes sets things incorrectly.
     
    #19
    gregorskii
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/03/08 20:14:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 16:55:02 (permalink)
    It was set to auto, I tried gen3 no difference in gpuz.
     
    Someone mentioned this in the ASRock forum, the m2 drives could be pulling from the lanes the CPU uses, apparently the lanes for the m2 come from the z370 chipset, not the processor.
     
    If it were true that the lanes were cutting down due to my (albeit increased love and affection for all m2 drives) then the first slot would run at x8 like the lower one. Nothing explains the main slot running at 1x. 
     
    On top of that why would any z370 board offer 3 m2 slots if it impacts lanes this much on the graphics card. These boards are not used for anything else but gaming? :)
     
    This is all a bit much, I dunno all the details. I think there is not much different between x8 and x16 and I have a huge improvement already. Ill see what ASRock says, maybe there is something to the m2 drives killing x16.
    #20
    Sajin
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 49165
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
    • Location: Texas, USA.
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 199
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 16:57:07 (permalink)
    x8 is definitely enough for now.
    #21
    Sajin
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 49165
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
    • Location: Texas, USA.
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 199
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 18:03:35 (permalink)
    Remove all your m.2 drives, install a regular ssd onto one of the sata ports, install windows, check and see if your gpu will run at x8 or higher in the pcie2 slot. If it ends up running at x8 or higher you'll have your answer. 
    #22
    gregorskii
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/03/08 20:14:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 19:53:30 (permalink)
    I got someone on the phone from ASRock. He said the top lane should be running at x16 no matter what even with all the m2 drives.

    He suggested reseating the cpu and mobo to ensure the pins are connected on the processor correctly. Did that, checked for bent pins, no issues. He said if that doesn’t work to rma the board. I bought it from amazon, so I can still swap it out.

    Going to try that.

    If that doesn’t work he said it could be the processor itself not setting the bus correctly on the first slot.

    I doubt that, I think it’s a defective mobo.

    I’ll try the mobo first, then rma the processor if that doesn’t work.

    On an unrelated note now that the video card is running at 8x it works a lot more, leading to a solid 60 FPS at 1440 max settings in ROTR, but now a side note the fans are louder.

    Temp never goes above 72 but wow that card is not quiet.

    Going to mess with fan curves.

    I appreciate all the tips here, and hopefully someone else comes across this and finds some good help in the future.

    :)
    #23
    Sajin
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 49165
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
    • Location: Texas, USA.
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 199
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 20:05:01 (permalink)
    Ok, but if you wanted to test it really quick all you'd have to do is remove the 480 storage & 240 linux m.2's. Boot into windows and test.
    #24
    gregorskii
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/03/08 20:14:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 20:17:53 (permalink)
    True I will try that before going through the trouble of replacing the mobo.

    However with the math a single 4 lane m2 would kick the card out of 16 mode, as the cpu only has 16 lanes.

    Unless it moves some of them over to the cpu once the amount of pci devices on the chipset exceeds the reserved bandwidth.

    Either way... yes will test. Haha.

    Ty
    #25
    gregorskii
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/03/08 20:14:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 21:43:53 (permalink)
    All but windows m2 out, 1x speed.
    #26
    Sajin
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 49165
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
    • Location: Texas, USA.
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 199
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/22 21:47:43 (permalink)
    Guess it's time to rma then. 
    #27
    bdary
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 10330
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/04/25 14:08:16
    • Location: Florida
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 116
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/23 06:40:09 (permalink)
    At least you have it figured out now and a resolution...


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    #28
    gregorskii
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/03/08 20:14:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/23 10:03:30 (permalink)
    Yes thank you all for the help.
     
    The help debugging guide on this forum was a great help too. 
     
    It may be prudent to add a detailed (or summary) of the PCIe bus speeds, how to check, and what they mean in GPUz. That was the part of this bout of troubleshooting I found the hardest to decipher. You end up reading a lot of old info, or info about other mobos / cards.
     
    Cheers!
    #29
    Cool GTX
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 30975
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/12/12 14:22:25
    • Location: Folding for the Greater Good
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 122
    Re: 1080 SC Performance 2018/03/23 11:27:20 (permalink)
    the CPU integrated graphic turned Off in the MB BIOS ?

    Learn your way around the EVGA Forums, Rules & limits on new accounts Ultimate Self-Starter Thread For New Members

    I am a Volunteer Moderator - not an EVGA employee

    https://foldingathome.org -->become a citizen scientist and contribute your compute power to help fight global health threats

    RTX Project EVGA X99 FTWK Nibbler EVGA X99 Classified EVGA 3080Ti FTW3 Ultra


    #30
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile