Getting this in my logs for the last few hours
 

01:09:03:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.45:80': Empty work server assignment
01:09:03:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.35:80
01:09:03:WARNING:WU01:FS01:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.45:80': Empty work server assignment
01:09:03:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 171.64.65.35:80
01:09:03:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Failed to get assignment from '171.64.65.35:80': Empty work server assignment
01:09:03:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Could not get an assignment
01:09:04:WARNING:WU01:FS01:Failed to get assignment from '171.64.65.35:80': Empty work server assignment
01:09:04:ERROR:WU01:FS01:Exception: Could not get an assignment

 
Anyone else or is it me?
 

Turn off your Rigs
Turn off your Network
Wait 5 or 10 minutes turn back on your network
Wait 5 minutes the Power on your Rigs Update them if needed then see you can get some new WU's
Server Status http://fah-web.stanford.edu/pybeta/serverstat.html a lot of them a also Down.

Time is for the most part all we need when a server goes down.
Doing the above provide that time but also allows you refresh your Rig and Clear any Lost Memory do to Memory Leaks as so one.
Here is another Link that some may find useful http://fah-web.stanford.edu/new/psummary.html

It's getting frustrating that Stanford still sees this project as nothing more than volunteer.  They seriously need to start taking it at face value for what it is.  We are giving them hundreds, nah thousands of hours of cpu/gpu time for free, and they act as if it's nothing at all.  They have the resources to pay someone to monitor the servers 24-7, they should be doing it.  They just don't think it's worth the money or time because we always come back, just like people in abusive relationships.

nibbler still holding?

Ranmacanada
It's getting frustrating that Stanford still sees this project as nothing more than volunteer.  They seriously need to start taking it at face value for what it is.  We are giving them hundreds, nah thousands of hours of cpu/gpu time for free, and they act as if it's nothing at all.  They have the resources to pay someone to monitor the servers 24-7, they should be doing it.  They just don't think it's worth the money or time because we always come back, just like people in abusive relationships.

Have you seen Hypernetwork? I'm curious if it's just a paid F@H.

Uhh, spring break.

Is it seriously spring break right now?  Is that why no one rebooted the servers this morning?

Seems to be the reporting server that is down
 
Looks like they are showing updates here
 
http://folding.stanford.edu/stats/donors
 
 
 
 STR1D3R_2 you can check your score here: http://folding.stanford.edu/stats/donor/1894127
 
 
 
 

STR1D3R_2
http://med.stanford.edu/s...academic-calendar.html

My phone is being a pia to post links from .
That's where I saw it. Seems ad soon as they leave, the servers go down. Makes me wonder if someone is paid to hold wires together like a human conductor.
 
http://med.stanford.edu/school/academic-calendar.html
 
 
(edit link Cool GTX)

It's an ongoing joke that every holiday the servers go on vacation as well.  It's one of the reasons a lot of folders get angry at Stanford.  They treat the donors as a second thought when they have more than enough money to hire someone to monitor the servers 24-7.

Just had a bid update{dump} @ 3PM update. Strider, you're kicking butt dude. 

If this information is so important to them, maybe they should either hire someone, or partner with MS or Google who would be able to handle the data properly.  I mean some of the servers they are using are 15-20 years old, they admitted so in the forums.  They use the machines until they die, and run out of spare parts and refuse to replace them until it's too late.  They have 57 "servers", and only 12 of them are currently working.  When are they going to start taking this project seriously?  I mean we could find the cure to cancer or Parkinsons or that, but Stanford might lose it because of their inability to keep the servers up.

For a research entity with a fancy-looking website (that appears as not having been updated for a couple years) with a big banner on the main page soliciting more folders, I personally think it would be a bit embarrassing running their whole operation in such an amateurish fashion -- servers going down every holiday weekend, more servers "not accepting" jobs than are running, etc. Stanford's folding program needs a major "refresh" starting with their folding software (when was it last updated?) and do some major hardware upgrades on their server setup. Hate to crack a joke here, but their website's main page reminds me of those fancy fake facades in the spaghetti westerns enticing customers to what appears to be an established saloon, only to fall down in the street and expose a shanty shack.