boylerya
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1910
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/11/23 19:18:00
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
|
panzlock
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1736
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/11/10 17:56:33
- Location: Canada
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Intel Displays 10nm Cannon Lake Wafer, First Signs Of PCIe 4.0, $1 Billion AI Investme
2017/09/19 13:24:45
(permalink)
|
boylerya
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1910
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/11/23 19:18:00
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Intel Displays 10nm Cannon Lake Wafer, First Signs Of PCIe 4.0, $1 Billion AI Investme
2017/09/19 14:57:47
(permalink)
|
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
- Total Posts : 38977
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
- Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 282
Re: Intel Displays 10nm Cannon Lake Wafer, First Signs Of PCIe 4.0, $1 Billion AI Investme
2017/09/19 15:09:29
(permalink)
boylerya
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-ai-10nm-pcie-4.0-wafer,35490.html
Seems that would be on the next intel chipset thatll most likely be the 400 series. Which is where we will probably see first 8core mainstream cpus starting with icelake.
Fixed the above link to work. As such, Intel announced that it is making strategic investments in a broad spate of partnerships and R&D initiatives. Intel is spending $1 billion through its Intel Capital fund with startups like Mighty AI, Data Robot, and Lumiata.
post edited by bcavnaugh - 2017/09/19 15:12:40
|
Xavier Zepherious
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 6746
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/07/04 12:53:39
- Location: Medicine Hat ,Alberta, Canada
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 16
Re: Intel Displays 10nm Cannon Lake Wafer, First Signs Of PCIe 4.0, $1 Billion AI Investme
2017/09/19 21:56:10
(permalink)
i posted as a followup on the 10nm issue
not saying their still isn't an issue with 10nm and why it's late... could be leaking... not much gains - we don't know till we see real data - seeing wafers isn't enough
|
panzlock
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1736
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/11/10 17:56:33
- Location: Canada
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Intel Displays 10nm Cannon Lake Wafer, First Signs Of PCIe 4.0, $1 Billion AI Investme
2017/09/20 10:55:40
(permalink)
boylerya
Seems like they missed out on a chance to start a thread on the topic like i did considering the topic of this thread is not intended to focus on intel's troubles with 10nm as is clear to those that read the article i posted.
Point is there's already a 10nm Intel thread where all these issues can be discussed collectively.
|
Xavier Zepherious
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 6746
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/07/04 12:53:39
- Location: Medicine Hat ,Alberta, Canada
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 16
Re: Intel Displays 10nm Cannon Lake Wafer, First Signs Of PCIe 4.0, $1 Billion AI Investme
2017/09/20 11:54:51
(permalink)
|
boylerya
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1910
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/11/23 19:18:00
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Intel Displays 10nm Cannon Lake Wafer, First Signs Of PCIe 4.0, $1 Billion AI Investme
2017/09/21 00:02:45
(permalink)
I dont know why there is a discussion on intel having some difficulty transitioning to 10nm when it happened with 14nm and will definitely happen with 7nm. Might as well get ahead of the game and make a thread on intel's upcoming troubles transitioning to 7nm.
|
Hoggle
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 10101
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2003/10/13 22:10:45
- Location: Eugene, OR
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4
Re: Intel Displays 10nm Cannon Lake Wafer, First Signs Of PCIe 4.0, $1 Billion AI Investme
2017/09/21 01:15:36
(permalink)
I would say Intel showing off a 10nm is different enough from having trouble making a 10nm wafer for them to be separate threads.
The real thing I would wonder is what the benchmarks are, what wattage is can operate at and how much heat is produced. While benchmarks are really the biggest thing most people will care about heat becomes another important number as it could make it more overclock friendly and possibly could even result in more powerful laptop performance. Wattage is probably least important in a desktop but in a laptop or tablet it would give the CPU longer battery life and if going from 14nm to 10nm gives 2-3 hours more battery life people will be pretty happy even if they don't see an improved speed.
|