EVGA

EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal

Author
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
  • Total Posts : 36578
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
  • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 249
2019/06/18 17:37:41 (permalink)
Has anyone Run Port Royal 1.1 on their EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 Graphics Card(s)?
X299FTW
Low Run: 2227  
High Run: 2307
https://www.3dmark.com/compare/pr/104610/pr/104608/pr/104606
Z370 FTW
Low Run: 2234
High Run: 2303 
https://www.3dmark.com/compare/pr/104609/pr/104611/pr/104612 
But in the End Not Even Worth Running. Not Game Playable.
post edited by bcavnaugh - 2019/06/18 19:25:19


#1

10 Replies Related Threads

    catawalks
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 58
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/09/16 19:30:32
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal 2019/06/18 19:21:19 (permalink)
    Not sure which card the other 1080ti is for this comparison (it's not mine), but I'm wondering if the drivers tanked the performance in Port Royal.
     
    https://www.3dmark.com/compare/pr/57975/pr/104610#
     
    I wonder if the older drivers help to get a lot higher scores than what are capable now. I'd be willing to test with 417.71 or 418.81 and see if the scores go up.


     
    7700k + Titan V wrapped in an EVGA Hadron Air
    #2
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 36578
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 249
    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal 2019/06/18 19:28:37 (permalink)
    catawalks
    Not sure which card the other 1080ti is for this comparison (it's not mine), but I'm wondering if the drivers tanked the performance in Port Royal.
     
    https://www.3dmark.com/compare/pr/57975/pr/104610#
     
    I wonder if the older drivers help to get a lot higher scores than what are capable now. I'd be willing to test with 417.71 or 418.81 and see if the scores go up.

    https://www.3dmark.com/compare/pr/104610/pr/67134/pr/20646/pr/20610 Top 4 out of 22 Intel Core i9-7900X Processor
    https://www.3dmark.com/compare/pr/104610/pr/67134/pr/20646/pr/20610/pr/85151/pr/74849 Added #21 and #22
     
    https://www.3dmark.com/compare/pr/3782/pr/35504/pr/83458/pr/104612  Intel Core i7-8700K Processor
     
    That Score is also the Highest on Record so not a good Compare.
    https://www.3dmark.com/search#/?mode=advanced&url=/proxycon/ajax/search2/gpu/pr/P/1127/9238?minScore=0&gpuName=NVIDIA%20GeForce%20GTX%201080%20Ti&gpuCount=1
    Link will not work in IE 11.
    It could be or because I am running a different version of the Benchmark and Windows 10 1903
    I Still need to find the correct settings for 1903
     
    Odd that this Driver 418.81 is to old to support DXR
    418.81 show no support

     
     GeForce Game Ready Driver WHQL
    425.31 April 11, 2019  Release Highlights: Game Ready Drivers provide the best possible gaming experience for all major new releases, including Virtual Reality games. Prior to a new title launching, our driver team is working up until the last minute to ensure every performance tweak and bug fix is included for the best gameplay on day-1.
    Game Ready Provides the optimal gaming experience for Anno 1800
    Gaming Technology Includes support for DirectX Raytracing (DXR) on GeForce GTX 1060 6GB (and higher) and GeForce GTX 1660 (and higher) GPUs
    post edited by bcavnaugh - 2019/06/18 20:34:29

    Attached Image(s)



    #3
    blaise
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 119
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/03/10 21:48:56
    • Location: Sydney, Australia
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 4
    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal 2019/06/19 12:03:58 (permalink)
    I have a pair of 1080TI's and my score went up, not down 3900 3929 (within margin of error I assume).
     
    Run was done with zero optimisations
     
    Another run... this time I remembered to turn G-Sync off 4237
    #4
    catawalks
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 58
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/09/16 19:30:32
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal 2019/06/19 14:55:21 (permalink)
    bcavnaugh
    catawalks
    Not sure which card the other 1080ti is for this comparison (it's not mine), but I'm wondering if the drivers tanked the performance in Port Royal.
     
    https://www.3dmark.com/compare/pr/57975/pr/104610#
     
    I wonder if the older drivers help to get a lot higher scores than what are capable now. I'd be willing to test with 417.71 or 418.81 and see if the scores go up.

    https://www.3dmark.com/compare/pr/104610/pr/67134/pr/20646/pr/20610 Top 4 out of 22 Intel Core i9-7900X Processor
    https://www.3dmark.com/compare/pr/104610/pr/67134/pr/20646/pr/20610/pr/85151/pr/74849 Added #21 and #22
     
    https://www.3dmark.com/compare/pr/3782/pr/35504/pr/83458/pr/104612  Intel Core i7-8700K Processor
     
    That Score is also the Highest on Record so not a good Compare.
    https://www.3dmark.com/search#/?mode=advanced&url=/proxycon/ajax/search2/gpu/pr/P/1127/9238?minScore=0&gpuName=NVIDIA%20GeForce%20GTX%201080%20Ti&gpuCount=1
    Link will not work in IE 11.
    It could be or because I am running a different version of the Benchmark and Windows 10 1903
    I Still need to find the correct settings for 1903
     
    Odd that this Driver 418.81 is to old to support DXR
    418.81 show no support

     
     GeForce Game Ready Driver WHQL
    425.31 April 11, 2019  Release Highlights: Game Ready Drivers provide the best possible gaming experience for all major new releases, including Virtual Reality games. Prior to a new title launching, our driver team is working up until the last minute to ensure every performance tweak and bug fix is included for the best gameplay on day-1.
    Game Ready Provides the optimal gaming experience for Anno 1800
    Gaming Technology Includes support for DirectX Raytracing (DXR) on GeForce GTX 1060 6GB (and higher) and GeForce GTX 1660 (and higher) GPUs


     
    It seems that all the higher scores are with older drivers that aren't even supposed to have support for DXR on GTX yet. Seems like some trickery going on there that screws with the numbers. 3dmark shows that the drivers are "Approved" though so it might be a valid way to double your score.
     


     
    7700k + Titan V wrapped in an EVGA Hadron Air
    #5
    blaise
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 119
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/03/10 21:48:56
    • Location: Sydney, Australia
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 4
    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal 2019/06/19 15:19:15 (permalink)
    I did a run on April 12 using traditional reflections and got 7903 (non-default settings used) for the GPU score (which is essentially the Port Royal final score). Here's another I did with normal settings but run at 1080p - 6291. Remember, both of these scores were performed with 1080 TI's in SLI and an i9- 9900k. So yeah, some of those scores are iffy considering that both of the silly high scores were run a month or two before an official 10-series RT enabled driver release and are insanely high for a single GTX-1080 TI.
    #6
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 36578
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 249
    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal 2019/06/19 15:31:34 (permalink)
    Thanks blaise for the post and info, I will run the same and see what it shows.
    I think 3dmark has a lot of Bad Scores and even on the HOF side that also needs some house cleaning.


    #7
    catawalks
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 58
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/09/16 19:30:32
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal 2019/06/19 17:58:51 (permalink)
    bcavnaugh
    Thanks blaise for the post and info, I will run the same and see what it shows.
    I think 3dmark has a lot of Bad Scores and even on the HOF side that also needs some house cleaning.




    I agree with that 100%. I wish they had a way to report fraudulent scores or at least scores that shouldn't be considered anymore.


     
    7700k + Titan V wrapped in an EVGA Hadron Air
    #8
    blaise
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 119
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/03/10 21:48:56
    • Location: Sydney, Australia
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 4
    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal 2019/06/19 18:18:45 (permalink)
    catawalks
    bcavnaugh
    Thanks blaise for the post and info, I will run the same and see what it shows.
    I think 3dmark has a lot of Bad Scores and even on the HOF side that also needs some house cleaning.


    I agree with that 100%. I wish they had a way to report fraudulent scores or at least scores that shouldn't be considered anymore.

    I was trying to crack the top 10 Hall of Fame scores for Cloud Gate (I'm still No. 9 for 2 x GPU) and there were some ridiculous scores (current outright top score is ~87k but there were scores boasting over 300k in the list). I reported them and although it took a few weeks, UL purged all the fake (or exploit) scores from the Cloud Gate Hall of Fame lists. So yes; you can report them and they will indeed remove illegitimate scores. Just use the Report a Problem form on UL's Support page to get their attention
    #9
    catawalks
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 58
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/09/16 19:30:32
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal 2019/06/19 18:58:53 (permalink)
    blaise
    catawalks
    bcavnaugh
    Thanks blaise for the post and info, I will run the same and see what it shows.
    I think 3dmark has a lot of Bad Scores and even on the HOF side that also needs some house cleaning.


    I agree with that 100%. I wish they had a way to report fraudulent scores or at least scores that shouldn't be considered anymore.

    I was trying to crack the top 10 Hall of Fame scores for Cloud Gate (I'm still No. 9 for 2 x GPU) and there were some ridiculous scores (current outright top score is ~87k but there were scores boasting over 300k in the list). I reported them and although it took a few weeks, UL purged all the fake (or exploit) scores from the Cloud Gate Hall of Fame lists. So yes; you can report them and they will indeed remove illegitimate scores. Just use the Report a Problem form on UL's Support page to get their attention




    Ah, glad you mentioned that. I didn't realize there was any options for recourse that we had.


     
    7700k + Titan V wrapped in an EVGA Hadron Air
    #10
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 36578
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 249
    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal 2019/06/19 19:07:16 (permalink)
    "Just use the Report a Problem form on UL's Support page to get their attention"
    Never get an answer from them.
    I had an issue with one of my Benchmarks and was never even bothered with for them to look at it.
    Sometime the CPU Core Count is way off and that was the issue I was having on one of my X299 Rigs.


    #11
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile