bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
- Total Posts : 38977
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
- Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 282
|
catawalks
New Member
- Total Posts : 58
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/09/16 19:30:32
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal
2019/06/18 19:21:19
(permalink)
Not sure which card the other 1080ti is for this comparison (it's not mine), but I'm wondering if the drivers tanked the performance in Port Royal. https://www.3dmark.com/compare/pr/57975/pr/104610# I wonder if the older drivers help to get a lot higher scores than what are capable now. I'd be willing to test with 417.71 or 418.81 and see if the scores go up.
7700k + Titan V wrapped in an EVGA Hadron Air
|
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
- Total Posts : 38977
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
- Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 282
Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal
2019/06/18 19:28:37
(permalink)
|
blaise
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 291
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/03/10 21:48:56
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 5
Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal
2019/06/19 12:03:58
(permalink)
I have a pair of 1080TI's and my score went up, not down 3900 → 3929 (within margin of error I assume). Run was done with zero optimisations Another run... this time I remembered to turn G-Sync off 4237
|
catawalks
New Member
- Total Posts : 58
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/09/16 19:30:32
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal
2019/06/19 14:55:21
(permalink)
7700k + Titan V wrapped in an EVGA Hadron Air
|
blaise
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 291
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/03/10 21:48:56
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 5
Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal
2019/06/19 15:19:15
(permalink)
I did a run on April 12 using traditional reflections and got 7903 (non-default settings used) for the GPU score (which is essentially the Port Royal final score). Here's another I did with normal settings but run at 1080p - 6291. Remember, both of these scores were performed with 1080 TI's in SLI and an i9- 9900k. So yeah, some of those scores are iffy considering that both of the silly high scores were run a month or two before an official 10-series RT enabled driver release and are insanely high for a single GTX-1080 TI.
|
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
- Total Posts : 38977
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
- Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 282
Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal
2019/06/19 15:31:34
(permalink)
Thanks blaise for the post and info, I will run the same and see what it shows. I think 3dmark has a lot of Bad Scores and even on the HOF side that also needs some house cleaning.
|
catawalks
New Member
- Total Posts : 58
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/09/16 19:30:32
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal
2019/06/19 17:58:51
(permalink)
bcavnaugh Thanks blaise for the post and info, I will run the same and see what it shows. I think 3dmark has a lot of Bad Scores and even on the HOF side that also needs some house cleaning.
I agree with that 100%. I wish they had a way to report fraudulent scores or at least scores that shouldn't be considered anymore.
7700k + Titan V wrapped in an EVGA Hadron Air
|
blaise
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 291
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/03/10 21:48:56
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 5
Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal
2019/06/19 18:18:45
(permalink)
catawalks
bcavnaugh Thanks blaise for the post and info, I will run the same and see what it shows. I think 3dmark has a lot of Bad Scores and even on the HOF side that also needs some house cleaning.
I agree with that 100%. I wish they had a way to report fraudulent scores or at least scores that shouldn't be considered anymore.
I was trying to crack the top 10 Hall of Fame scores for Cloud Gate (I'm still No. 9 for 2 x GPU) and there were some ridiculous scores (current outright top score is ~87k but there were scores boasting over 300k in the list). I reported them and although it took a few weeks, UL purged all the fake (or exploit) scores from the Cloud Gate Hall of Fame lists. So yes; you can report them and they will indeed remove illegitimate scores. Just use the Report a Problem form on UL's Support page to get their attention
|
catawalks
New Member
- Total Posts : 58
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/09/16 19:30:32
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal
2019/06/19 18:58:53
(permalink)
blaise
catawalks
bcavnaugh Thanks blaise for the post and info, I will run the same and see what it shows. I think 3dmark has a lot of Bad Scores and even on the HOF side that also needs some house cleaning.
I agree with that 100%. I wish they had a way to report fraudulent scores or at least scores that shouldn't be considered anymore.
I was trying to crack the top 10 Hall of Fame scores for Cloud Gate (I'm still No. 9 for 2 x GPU) and there were some ridiculous scores (current outright top score is ~87k but there were scores boasting over 300k in the list). I reported them and although it took a few weeks, UL purged all the fake (or exploit) scores from the Cloud Gate Hall of Fame lists. So yes; you can report them and they will indeed remove illegitimate scores. Just use the Report a Problem form on UL's Support page to get their attention
Ah, glad you mentioned that. I didn't realize there was any options for recourse that we had.
7700k + Titan V wrapped in an EVGA Hadron Air
|
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
- Total Posts : 38977
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
- Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 282
Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + Driver 430.86 = Port Royal
2019/06/19 19:07:16
(permalink)
"Just use the Report a Problem form on UL's Support page to get their attention" Never get an answer from them. I had an issue with one of my Benchmarks and was never even bothered with for them to look at it. Sometime the CPU Core Count is way off and that was the issue I was having on one of my X299 Rigs.
|