EVGA

Build - ASUS TRX40 ROG Zenith II Extreme

Author
Pastulio
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 193
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2013/04/25 10:49:29
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
2020/09/08 03:36:38 (permalink)
Hello,

I've been (somewhat) a devoted Intel user for generations now but everything transpiring lately, I thought I'd make the switch to AMD -- or at least to check out one of these ThreadRippers that debuted, anyway. *{I built my Current rig in ~2008~ and it has served me well throughout the years. So well, that while I would truly like to stick with EVGA for the MoBo in my Next Decade-Build, this Zenith seems to be the current* winner to upgrade to}
I went ahead and got this motherboard -- yet to receive* -- because of HolidaySales. I don't know much about comparing the two in regards to architecture/etc. (Intel vs. AMD), I just know that the Ryzen TR series` offers A LOT more cores.
One of the main features this board has going for it, is that it offers 5× 2280 M.2 Bays. I guess the two upfront make direct use of the CPU, while the bay on the back and the "dimm" expansion port utilize the SB-chipset. Considering this, should I look into getting 5× Drives and establishing two independent RAID configurations?
Again, I don't know much -- I heard though that putting 'x' Drives on effects performance*.
At the moment, this is what I am considering (for parts) -

MoBo: ASUS TRX40 ROG Zenith II Extreme
CPU: 64-Core AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X @ 4.3GHz + EK Liquid-Cooling
RAM: 128GB DDR4 [8×16] Corsair Vengeance LPX @ 5000MHz, CL:18 (CMK32GX4M2Z5000C18)
GPU: (*)4× 'xx'GB EVGA Hydro Copper RTX 3090
C:\8TB - 2× 4TB Sabrent Rocket Q4 M.2 SSD (RAID "0")
D:\24TB - 3× 8TB Sabrent Rocket Q M.2 SSD (RAID "0")
Chassis: ?

Primarily the build is going to be used for Server orientated purposes, and I intend to get into 'DeepLearning'.
...
Would I be better off with a "Server" CPU?


Thanks.
post edited by Pastulio - 2020/09/08 03:44:13
#1

2 Replies Related Threads

    Vlada011
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 10257
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/03/25 00:14:05
    • Location: Belgrade-Serbia
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 11
    Re: Build - ASUS TRX40 ROG Zenith II Extreme 2020/09/08 04:02:23 (permalink)
    Threadripper is a great, amazing processor... Investment for a long time.
    But I would check 3 times, again and again, and again is it so good investment for gaming.
    It would be bad if RTX3090 work 10% slower than on some CPU with a higher frequency with much fewer cores.
    8-12 cores are the best for gaming... they work on better frequency than Thdreadripper.
     
    So powerful and attractive motherboards as TRX40 make to Threadripper look great.
    Everyone would like such a configuration in PC. For me only better option is EVGA DARK SR-3 with RTX3090 K|NGP|N...
    That's the coolest hardware at the moment. People used SR-2 long time, didn't care about PCI-E 3.0, USB 3.1... M.2... and similar things.
    They didn't want to change something so cool as SR-2. 
    post edited by Vlada011 - 2020/09/08 04:06:40

    i7-5820K 4.5GHz/RVE10-EK Monoblock/Dominator Platinum 2666/ASUS GTX1080Ti Poseidon/SBZxR /Samsung 970 EVO PLus 1TB/850 EVO 1TB /EVGA 1200P2/Lian Li PC-O11WXC/EK XRES D5 Revo 100 Glass/Coolstream PE360-Noctua NF-A12x25 PWM x3
    http://www.evga.com
    http://www.intel.com
    http://www.nvidia.com
    https://watercool.de
    http://www.lian-li.com
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHMun5xiRe0
     
    https://xdevs.com/guide/2080ti_kpe/#intro
    https://www.evga.com/articles/01386/evga-sr-3-dark/
     
     
     

     
     
    #2
    Mifune
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 59
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/12/30 03:21:32
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Build - ASUS TRX40 ROG Zenith II Extreme 2020/12/21 09:26:36 (permalink)
    I have also been using Intel CPUs in all my builds for a long time. I upgrade more frequently, but I don’t think I’ve selected an AMD chip since the 1990s. Now, however, I am tempted. But when I look at the 3990 and 3970, I notice that although the 3970 obviously has fewer cores, it still has more than the i9-10980 and with about the same clock speed. Factor in the price differentials and the fact that future AMD chips will continue to use the same motherboards for a while, and the 3979 starts to look like the sweet spot.
    #3
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile