bcavnaugh

EVGA_JacobF
60FPS is not possible today in BFV at 4K with max settings on a single RTX 2080 Ti, so that is why you either need to set a lower resolution (like 1440P) or use scaling. For this I used 70% scaling. I prefer to use scaling instead of changing resolution as #1 you can keep the resolution to native, #2 UI elements are still rendered at 4K and #3 you will get better quality on YouTube as 4K allows for a higher bitrate.

Should we set our Monitor to 1440P or only in the Game Settings?

thatKingKong
Nice trying to convince people that RTX is not a failure lol.

EVGA_JacobF
60FPS is not possible today in BFV at 4K with max settings on a single RTX 2080 Ti, so that is why you either need to set a lower resolution (like 1440P) or use scaling. For this I used 70% scaling. I prefer to use scaling instead of changing resolution as #1 you can keep the resolution to native, #2 UI elements are still rendered at 4K and #3 you will get better quality on YouTube as 4K allows for a higher bitrate.

the_Scarlet_one
*known problems* rather than launching a product that is finished. Welcome to the world of being a paying beta tester. Not a fan of NVidia’s or Dice’s launch this round.

somethingc00l

the_Scarlet_one
*known problems* rather than launching a product that is finished. Welcome to the world of being a paying beta tester. Not a fan of NVidia’s or Dice’s launch this round.

In their defense, the game doesn't officially launch until Nov. 20.
 
70% scaling is likely the performance level you'd get with DLSS at 4k, hope they get that working soon.

thatKingKong

bcavnaugh

thatKingKong

bcavnaugh

Andrew_K

thatKingKong
Nice trying to convince people that RTX is not a failure lol.

Failure? Some people are so salty about the 2080's lol. I love my ti ftw3 

There are a Lot of New Forum Members that seem to come here every Release of a new Graphics Card.
Only to Troll and post misinformation.

I'm a new member?
thatKingKong - Joined: 2/6/2008
bcavnaugh - Joined: 9/18/2012
Hmmm...

Hmmm...I did not say you, I said New Members. But lets keep this Thread on Topic Shall We.

Funny... you're the one that jumped off the topic.
The whole selling point of RTX cards was RT. But with RT enabled, you lose half of your FPS. That's my point of failure.

the_Scarlet_one

Andrew_K
Again, calling this a "failure" because results are lining up with what was speculated and validated early on is silly. If you don't like or can't afford the 2080 series, don't buy it. But if you can/do, like so many of us here, you get the benefits of new, faster, cooler running cards in addition to ray tracing. To expect this generation of cards to run raytracing at the exact same frames as them not running with raytracing is simply moronic.

I do not see Ray Tracing a failure, yet. What I see as a failure is NVidias blatant hiding of real world performance.

In every launch, NVidia boasts about performance, claiming “this card is faster than that card” and so on. NVidia made a huge deal out of raytracing, and purposefully hid the resolutions and FPS.

You say “results are lining up with what was speculated and validated early on” but not once was numbers out out. The only speculation that was actually put out was the rise of the tomb raider video.. one video, of a game being played. No numbers or tests were released or validated.

Now the BF5 is “out” we see a massive hit, and know that 1080p 60fps is the same goal that was being targeted 10 years ago. Did you forget that Dice already admitted to having to scale RTX back because it was even more of a performance hit than previously announced, so that validation window does not fall into line with what is now available.

Top it off that NVidia isn’t helping DICE or any other developer once they give them the ability to code the game for RTX.

Look back at PHysX, and how it mostly has fallen off. No developers dont even seem to care about it anymore.

Sli, while many games support it, many hundred more don’t.

NVidia is removing sli from cards that have always been able to use it.

Raytracing may be great for now, but it wouldn’t surprise me if it fades away a good bit and becomes the next version of PHysX, super hyped them dies off like Virtual Reality.

And Dlss.. the Xbox and PlayStation have had dynamic resolution for years.. now NVidia found a way to port that into their tech since all of the developers have ported games from console to pc. If you people are happy with intentionally running at lower resolution to gain performance, then color me shocked. Never though I would see the day that the PCMR wanted their console feature ported to make 4k monitors displaying a 1440p image upscale rather than being fully native 4k.

What I think NVidia could have done was launched dlss with the 20Xx, and hold onto RTX a little longer, and built the card to perform better right out of the gate.

the_Scarlet_one
... them dies off like Virtual Reality.

MuXuSS

the_Scarlet_one
... them dies off like Virtual Reality.

Don’t be so affirmative dude in life!

For example VR is far-away to be dead actually.

I guess you don’t or can’t have an RTX ! I think that’s the real point.

I wished l’d be able to send you some picks of my new FTW3, insane. And who really care about ultra RTX right now?!? Welcome RTX, even if I agree with you about the fact that nvidia over communicate on it with no real results!!? But sincerely we’re already new it...don’t be moron, that’s the way it used to be in marketing...RIP human brain

Nalph
Well with DXR and native 4K scaled down to 70% I do manage to get 60 fps... But sadly even with v-sync the frame drops are terrible. I think it may be my CPU. I'm not sure how much BF5 is CPU hungry especially at 4K scaled down to 70%... But my 6700K is 100% across all cores when playing. I notice the drops when my cpu's current usage in HWI monitor is around 95% on a few cores. I think my old 6700K needs to be changed finally