EVGA

2070 XC Ultra review WANTED!

Author
Ntweedie2007
New Member
  • Total Posts : 4
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2018/11/14 18:27:00
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
2018/11/15 04:23:32 (permalink)
Hi all
 
The 2070 XC Ultra is currently on sale at Scan for £509.99 - £40 off - so I am seriously considering it as an upgrade from my current 1060 6gb.
 
I don't like buying blind though, and so far, there have been 0 reviews that I can find online for this card. Seen them for the standard XC, but not the Ultra. Anyone out there who has it and can give me a decent round-up - pros, cons? Particularly looking at heat and noise, but performance would be great too. Not looking for an essay, don't worry!
 
For comparison, my current card is a Asus Rog Strix 1060 6gb overclocked yada yada. Does great at 1080p 144Hz but looking at moving to 2k @ 120/144Hz.
 
Thanks a lot in advance.
#1

6 Replies Related Threads

    GTXJackBauer
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 10323
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/04/19 22:23:25
    • Location: (EVGA Discount) Associate Code : LMD3DNZM9LGK8GJ
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 48
    Re: 2070 XC Ultra review WANTED! 2018/11/15 04:28:13 (permalink)


     Use this Associate Code at your checkouts or follow these instructions for Up to 10% OFF on all your EVGA purchases:
    LMD3DNZM9LGK8GJ
    #2
    Ntweedie2007
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 4
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/11/14 18:27:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 2070 XC Ultra review WANTED! 2018/11/15 04:33:52 (permalink)
    GTXJackBauer






    While I appreciate the video, this is for the Black, not the XC Ultra.
     
    Hopefully someone can help me :)
    #3
    GTXJackBauer
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 10323
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/04/19 22:23:25
    • Location: (EVGA Discount) Associate Code : LMD3DNZM9LGK8GJ
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 48
    Re: 2070 XC Ultra review WANTED! 2018/11/15 05:08:28 (permalink)
    Ntweedie2007
     
     
    While I appreciate the video, this is for the Black, not the XC Ultra.
     
    Hopefully someone can help me :)




    My fault.  He has more reviews. 
     
    Here you go.



     Use this Associate Code at your checkouts or follow these instructions for Up to 10% OFF on all your EVGA purchases:
    LMD3DNZM9LGK8GJ
    #4
    somethingc00l
    EGC Admin
    • Total Posts : 752
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/03/14 13:44:57
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 11
    Re: 2070 XC Ultra review WANTED! 2018/11/15 11:37:44 (permalink)
    Ntweedie2007
    Seen them for the standard XC, but not the Ultra. 

    The only difference between the XC and the XC Ultra is a 15 MHz higher clock on the Ultra, otherwise they are identical. A review for one will be the exact same as the other.
    post edited by somethingc00l - 2018/11/15 15:55:50
    #5
    Ntweedie2007
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 4
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/11/14 18:27:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 2070 XC Ultra review WANTED! 2018/11/15 14:13:03 (permalink)
    somethingc00l
    Ntweedie2007
    Seen them for the standard XC, but not the Ultra. 

    The only difference between the XC and the XC Ultra is a 15 MHz higher clock on the Ultra, otherwise they are identical. A review for one will be the exact same as the other.




    Hey - are you sure? It's also 2.75 slot instead of 2 slot, so clearly there is more than just the clock speed which is the difference.
     
    I'm looking to get an actual hands on review from someone who has one, please. Thank you.
    #6
    somethingc00l
    EGC Admin
    • Total Posts : 752
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/03/14 13:44:57
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 11
    Re: 2070 XC Ultra review WANTED! 2018/11/15 15:55:41 (permalink)
    Ntweedie2007
    Hey - are you sure? It's also 2.75 slot instead of 2 slot, so clearly there is more than just the clock speed which is the difference.
     

    Whoops, you are correct. 
    #7
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile