[11:11:11] trust_me: I had a hamburger once... [20:32:06] moose517: ROFL i got my fro stuck on a sprinkler at work one time [20:32:09] moose517: that sucked
|
eNuQQ
ACX Member
- Total Posts : 252
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/02/21 18:46:49
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1

Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/26 19:36:26
(permalink)
That's a fairly impressive lineup from Intel, any price leaks so far? Those 8cores are looking pretty beastly. Can't wait to see what kind of rigs people on the forum will build with those 10K$+ budgets :D
Intel Core i7 2600K @4.5GHz | GIGABYTE P67A-UD7 | 8GB Mushkin Frostbyte 1600MHz | Corsair AX1200 Noctua NH-D14 | 2x EVGA GTX580 Classified | Intel 510 120GB SSD | ASUS Xonar Essence STX | Corsair 800D
|
Brocasta
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 614
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/02/10 22:09:49
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/26 19:49:04
(permalink)
Any of those 8 cores would be fine by me, times 2 of course. Curious, but not concerned about the pricing.
|
seronx
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 3824
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2007/02/08 20:58:59
- Location: Arizona
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 6
Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/26 19:53:20
(permalink)
Eyeing, Xeon E5-2650L for the Xeon server upgrades
ASRock Fatal1ty 990FX Professional AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core Processor GeiL Leggera 2*8 GB 1866 MHz Windows 8.1/EFI 64-bit MSI R7 260X OC Alienware OptX AW2210
|
wgmann03
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1355
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/11/28 17:05:55
- Location: Atlanta
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4

Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/26 19:57:09
(permalink)
Xeon E5-2687W 8 16 3.1 GHz 20 MB DDR3-1600 150 Watt 20MB Cache... complete overkill.
i3 540 @ 4.2GHz - 8GB DDR3 1333 @ 1600MHz - GA-P55-UD4P - OCZ Agility 3 240GB (RAID 0) 555/533 Read/Write EVGA GTX 460 SE (SLI) - PC Power Scilencer 750w - Antec 1200 Gaming Case - 2x Dell 22" Ultrasharp LCD (3360x1050) Heatware Profile---------Ebay Profile
|
Brocasta
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 614
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/02/10 22:09:49
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/26 20:02:18
(permalink)
wgmann03 Xeon E5-2687W 8 16 3.1 GHz 20 MB DDR3-1600 150 Watt 20MB Cache... complete overkill. Bulldozer/Zambezi/Interlagos has 16MB... right?
|
Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/26 20:05:54
(permalink)
can i use one of these 8 core 16 core xeon for desktop gaming?
CPU: Intel i7 980 @ 4.60 Gzh Mobo: Msi Big Bang Xpower Ram: 12 GB Patriot Viper 2000 MZH 10-11-10-28-1T Hard Drive: 2x Seagate Baracuda 1TB 7200.12 in Raid 0 GPU: 3x EVGA GTX 580 in Tri-SLi Sound Card: Soundblaster X-Fi Titanium HD Case: Coolermaster HAF 932 wit 240MM Rad Push/Pull Water Loop Power Supply: Corsair AX1200 80 Plus Gold Certified 3Dmark 11: 17187 We Are Intel! Pom! Pom! Pom! Pom! Sponsors Of Tomorow.
|
seronx
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 3824
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2007/02/08 20:58:59
- Location: Arizona
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 6
Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/26 20:07:12
(permalink)
Brocasta Bulldozer/Zambezi/Interlagos has 16MB... right? 32MBs 2MBs L2 per Module, 2MBs L3 per Module Interlagos 32MB Valencia 16MB Zambezi 16MB AMD is not core specific Intel is core specific 256KB L2 per Core, 2.5MB L3 per Core Xeon Romley 4 core -> 11MB Xeon Romley 6 core -> 16.5MB Xeon Romley 8 core -> 22MB
post edited by seronx - 2011/08/26 20:10:17
ASRock Fatal1ty 990FX Professional AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core Processor GeiL Leggera 2*8 GB 1866 MHz Windows 8.1/EFI 64-bit MSI R7 260X OC Alienware OptX AW2210
|
Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/26 20:13:44
(permalink)
Don't you think the TDP values are kind of unconventional? I mean there are too many steps compared to previous line-ups; 60-70-80-95-115-130-135-150
|
lehpron
Regular Guy
- Total Posts : 15766
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/05/18 15:22:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 186

Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/26 20:24:14
(permalink)
FYI: - Xeon E5-1600 replaces Xeon W3500/W3600 (Core i7 counterparts)
- Xeon E5-2600 is in part going after Xeon 5500/5600's
- Xeon E5-4600 will be aimed at Xeon 7500 and E7's.
All three use LGA2011, but we can't mix and match with our X79's. Intel is making an entirely different chipset just for E5-1600 called "C600", so those CPUs may not work in X79 either. It's sad reading those comments people still don't understand the meaning of Intel's TDP. TDP is just a thermal (heat wattage) category stating that a part cannot qualify for the next one down, so it gets the next one up. This way cooling companies don't have to tailor coolers to each CPU, rather a category, and Intel can debut future CPUs and still fall within an already established category. Companies/customers don't have the change the cooler everytime. Look at 2670 and 2680, differ by just 100MHz yet put in 115W TDP and 130W TDP, respectively. Since all other die specs are identical, chances are 2680 ends up slightly above 115W and doesn't qualify anymore. In fact all 20MB L3 cache 8-cores only differ by frequency and TDP, if we assumed linear variation we could see which see how close each one could come within their TDP's.
|
Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/26 20:43:11
(permalink)
That E5-2687W looks like a total beast.
Desktop: i7 3820 - ASUS X79 Sabertooth TUF - 4x4GB G.Skill TridentX 2400C9 - EVGA GTX 580 Classified ULTRA Hydro Copper Microsoft Surface Pro 4: i7 6650U - 16GB RAM - 256GB SSD - Sennheiser HD 598 - DualShock 4 Controller
|
Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/26 20:52:10
(permalink)
lehpron FYI: - Xeon E5-1600 replaces Xeon W3500/W3600 (Core i7 counterparts)
- Xeon E5-2600 is in part going after Xeon 5500/5600's
- Xeon E5-4600 will be aimed at Xeon 7500 and E7's.
All three use LGA2011, but we can't mix and match with our X79's. Intel is making an entirely different chipset just for E5-1600 called "C600", so those CPUs may not work in X79 either. It's sad reading those comments people still don't understand the meaning of Intel's TDP. TDP is just a thermal (heat wattage) category stating that a part cannot qualify for the next one down, so it gets the next one up. This way cooling companies don't have to tailor coolers to each CPU, rather a category, and Intel can debut future CPUs and still fall within an already established category. Companies/customers don't have the change the cooler everytime. Look at 2670 and 2680, differ by just 100MHz yet put in 115W TDP and 130W TDP, respectively. Since all other die specs are identical, chances are 2680 ends up slightly above 115W and doesn't qualify anymore. In fact all 20MB L3 cache 8-cores only differ by frequency and TDP, if we assumed linear variation we could see which see how close each one could come within their TDP's. What's sad is that you don't understand my post and conclude that I don't understand what TDP means. Well, you're wrong. I know what TDP means and in fact, hence my post. I found the TDP values reported interesting as there are new categories that didn't exist before.
|
lehpron
Regular Guy
- Total Posts : 15766
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/05/18 15:22:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 186

Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/26 22:11:22
(permalink)
theGryphon
lehpron It's sad reading those comments people still don't understand the meaning of Intel's TDP. What's sad is that you don't understand my post and conclude that I don't understand what TDP means. It is even sadder you assumed I was taking to or about you and took offense. I was talking about "those comments" in the article you linked. Furthermore, not everyone reading and replying to these forums is as knowledgable, newbies are born everyday and being a computer enthusiast doesn't requiring knowing the meat and potatos. Proof is there are very few people asking which cooler has what TDP limitation and more asking "what is the best cooler" for the CPU. Further proof are those that think an older cooler isn't unable to handle future CPUs despite sharing the same TDP bracket. Back on topic, I agree the number of TDP variations are extensive, but that can be explained easily: Segmentation. The more cores CPUs have (add in cache memories, HT and Turbo), the more variation in SKU's there will be and the previous lumps of TDP are too wide.
|
farthestkris
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 4109
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/03/30 15:54:27
- Location: Crunching Location .......... Location Not Found
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 12
Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/26 22:39:13
(permalink)
Halo_003 That E5-2687W looks like a total beast. two of those for a FAH rig please!
|
seronx
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 3824
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2007/02/08 20:58:59
- Location: Arizona
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 6
Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/26 22:50:56
(permalink)
farthestkris two of those for a FAH rig please! Do you have $3000-4000? I should say $6000-$8000 since you say two then the $300-$500 for the 2P Setup
post edited by seronx - 2011/08/26 22:52:12
ASRock Fatal1ty 990FX Professional AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core Processor GeiL Leggera 2*8 GB 1866 MHz Windows 8.1/EFI 64-bit MSI R7 260X OC Alienware OptX AW2210
|
Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/27 05:48:53
(permalink)
Probably, let me rummage around in my piggy bank...
My Affiliate Code: GL1IAAFWJF
|
Macaholic
ACX Member
- Total Posts : 341
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/08/18 18:07:59
- Location: 1 Infinite Loop
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2

|
Scott_J
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 702
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2004/10/21 01:17:53
- Location: California
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1

Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/27 08:55:14
(permalink)
seronx Brocasta Bulldozer/Zambezi/Interlagos has 16MB... right? 32MBs 2MBs L2 per Module, 2MBs L3 per Module Interlagos 32MB Valencia 16MB Zambezi 16MB AMD is not core specific Intel is core specific 256KB L2 per Core, 2.5MB L3 per Core Xeon Romley 4 core -> 11MB Xeon Romley 6 core -> 16.5MB Xeon Romley 8 core -> 22MB How is AMD not core specific and intel is? Do you you mean that because each unit has the cache instead of each core?
post edited by Scott_J - 2011/08/27 09:02:17
|
shogon
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 2737
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/08/30 09:27:20
- Location: Manteca (lard), CA
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 7

Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/27 09:23:00
(permalink)
^ It's how they went about there design preference I suppose, it's similar to how AMD uses stream and Nvidia uses CUDA (I think on the AMD). But yes those CPU's loook oh so expensive and wanting.
I will either find a way, or make one. ٩(๏̯͡๏)۶
|
linuxrouter
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 8043
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/02/28 14:47:45
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 102
Re:17 new Xeon CPU's for q4 (SB-E)
2011/08/27 10:36:37
(permalink)
The lineup looks great and I'm glad to see Intel moving to 8-cores. I'd be curious to see if Intel eventually comes out with a 10-core setup for SB-E like what the E7-8870 supports. Hopefully we'll see some benchmarks between SB-E Xeon dual and quad socket against AMD Interlagos.
|