2011/02/07 14:09:40
Halo_003
Yeah but running 4.5 @ 1.6v, updating bios and having to redo OC, is a lot different from a dead CPU.
 
Why don't you ask Falcon about that Gulftown he fried running 2.0V through it?
2011/02/07 14:11:12
farthestkris
Halo_003

Yeah but running 4.5 @ 1.6v, updating bios and having to redo OC, is a lot different from a dead CPU.

Why don't you ask Falcon about that Gulftown he fried running 2.0V through it?

thats a chiller .........
2011/02/07 14:12:44
Halo_003
farthestkris

Halo_003

Yeah but running 4.5 @ 1.6v, updating bios and having to redo OC, is a lot different from a dead CPU.

Why don't you ask Falcon about that Gulftown he fried running 2.0V through it?

thats a chiller .........

 
It was more to the point.. A dead CPU. Is dead. It doesn't boot at all. Whereas I'm now back to 4.0 and climbing. i.e. this isn't a dead CPU.
2011/02/07 14:26:12
OV3RCLK4
You might need more vcore than you used to. That is what happened to my old chip after a bios update. All my overclocks needed more vcore. Even after I went back to the original bios. Hope that is not the case with you.
2011/02/07 15:25:33
awalleyeguy
Halo_003

Update: Flashed to latest bios (78)

Frequency Control 
CPU Clock Ratio ( 21X )  Why doesn't 22 work?
CPU Host Frequency (Mhz) ( 215 
MCH Strap ( Auto )  Give 1600 a shot
CPU Uncore Frequency (Mhz) ( 3446Mhz { 16X } 
CPU Clock Skew ( 0 ps )  500 will not hurt anything
Spread Spectrum ( Disabled 
PCIE Frequency (Mhz) ( 109 ) Why? You are not at the insane point of 230+ put to like 102


Memory Feature         
Memory Speed ( XMP Profile 1 )  NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
Memory Control Setting ( Enabled ) 
Memory Frequency ( 1067Mhz / 2:8 
Channel Interleave Setting ( 6 Way 
Rank Interleave Setting ( 4 Way 
Memory Low Gap ( Auto ) 
tCL Setting ( 8 
tRCD Setting ( 9 
tRP Setting ( 8 ) 
tRAS Setting ( 24 
tRFC Setting ( Auto 
Command Rate ( 1t 


Voltage Control 
EVGA VDroop Control ( Without VDroop ) 
CPU VCore ( 1.5875 ) 
CPU VTT Voltage ( +450  Wayyyyyyyyyyyyy to high try 200-250
CPU PLL VCore ( 1.800 ) Some say higher some say lower, I think lower like 1.50 
**IOH PLL VCore ( 1.500 )  
DIMM Voltage ( 1.65 ) 
DIMM DQ Vref ( +0mV 
QPI PLL VCore ( 1.450  1.350
IOH VCore ( 1.300V This to high can hurt, running 1 295? 1.15-1.20  should be plenty. Raising this a lot never did squat for me.
IOH/ICH I/O Voltage ( 1.650V  Too high one click for every 2 IOH VCORE CLICKS This is anotherone that really does not seem to help anything.
**BR04 ( NF200) Voltage ( Auto ) (only on E-759) 
**VTT PWM Frequency ( 610 KHZ ) 
**CPU PWM Frequency ( 1210 KHZ ) 
**CPU Impedance ( Less ) 
**QPI Signal Compensation ( Middle ) <-- not on my bios.
ICH VCore ( 1.250 ) 
*PWM Frequency ( Not Used on Classified 
DDR Signal 0:  (+0)
DDR Signal 1:  (+0)
DDR Signal 2:  (+0)
CPU Signal:  (+0)
QPI Signal 0:  (+0)
QPI Signal 1:  (+0)
QPI Signal 2:  (+0)
PCIE Signal 0:  (+0)
PCIE Signal 1:  (+0)
CPU Feature 
Intel SpeedStep ( Disabled ) 
Turbo Mode Function ( Disabled ) 
CxE Function ( Disabled ) 
Execute Disable Bit ( Disabled 
Virtualization Technology ( Disabled 
Intel HT Technology ( Enabled ) 
Active Processor Cores ( All ) 
QPI Control Settings ( Enabled 
QPI Link Fast Mode ( Enabled 
QPI Frequency Selection ( 4.800 GT/s ) 
OC Recorvery ( Enabled  I disable.

PnP/PCI     PCI Express 
Maximum Payload Size ( 4096 )  

  Ther you have it my .02.
Notice I made no suggestions for v-core? Thats because give it what ever it needs and your cooling can handle.
  Remember these chips do not like to much voltage as much as they do not like to little.
 
2011/02/07 15:37:53
Halo_003
Roger Awall, testing that now. Starting at 190blck though, 1.40Vcore, +100 VTT. Just wanna see how high it gets with these settings.
2011/02/07 15:47:01
johnksss
98 percent of the time....you will have to redo your over clock. just no way around it and the clocks never work the same....until..... you start over...then once it's said and done...it usually either takes a tad bit more or less...and in half the cases...they are about the exact same. but for some odd reason...you have to do them all over to get them back to where they where to begin with.
could have something to do with memory locations from the old to new bios...speculation of course
2011/02/07 15:54:32
Halo_003
Interesting, but I saw this on my E758 as well. It's very odd imo.
2011/02/07 16:54:41
Halo_003
202x21 stable @ 1.40Vcore, +125VTT
 
Upping vcore to 1.5, and VTT to 200, pushing from here.
2011/02/07 18:06:27
Halo_003
bsod @ 1.50Vcore, +250VTT, 208x21.
 
Gave me 0x0000009c (MACHINE_CHECK_EXCEPTION)

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account