2010/12/07 15:03:27
awalleyeguy
loveha

johnksss

My i7 930 @ 4.35GHz scored P64116 with GPU Accelerated PhysX (gtx470's).

no cpu score in there anywhere..
and your link doesnt work.

Oops, I reran it just after I posted that and scored better.
http://3dmark.com/3dmv/2779832

You get a GPU Score and a CPU Score. Together they make a final core. That P64116 was my CPU Score. I noticed yours was lower for the same clock.
If you use GPU Accelerated PhysX it changes the CPU score because it is meant to be ran on the CPU, not your GPU. Unless I'm wrong, which is highly possible because I don't know to much about Vantage. I never run it with PhysX on the CPU so I don't know what the difference in score would be. That's why I was asking.

   You really can not compare apples to oranges, in case no one made it clear the "cpu test" actually  when phyxs is enabled is a cpu and gpu combined test. Which is the reason vantage runs with phyx do not coumt cause phyx is a nvidia only package.
  So saying your "CPU score" with a GTX470 is not a fair comparison to a "CPU score" with a GTX295 when phyx is enabled on both.
 
2010/12/07 15:11:06
johnksss
yeah, he got me with that one as well...was like...a 295 can't compare...lol
 
 
2010/12/07 16:11:44
Halo_003
Yeah lol that's what I was trying to say, dunno if I did successfully or not.. Soon as I finish cleaning the kitchen it'll be benching season again.
 
I really just need a good CPU though, the 295 has a lot of potential.
 
What's the max mV I could be running on it when load temps are like 38C?
2010/12/07 16:23:48
nateman_doo
until the red light comes on ;)
Is no one else impressed with that screen shot above?!  its Crysis 2.  That pic looks better then most digital camera pictures!
2010/12/07 16:32:10
johnksss
nateman_doo

until the red light comes on ;) <--aint that the truth..haha
Is no one else impressed with that screen shot above?!  its Crysis 2.  That pic looks better then most digital camera pictures!

looks impressive, but working on 3dmark11 right now..so get cha bench on...and say hi to the little one for me.
2010/12/07 16:41:10
Halo_003
johnksss

nateman_doo

until the red light comes on ;) <--aint that the truth..haha
Is no one else impressed with that screen shot above?!  its Crysis 2.  That pic looks better then most digital camera pictures!

looks impressive, but working on 3dmark11 right now..so get cha bench on...and say hi to the little one for me.

 
Wow I thought that was an actual pic Nate lol..
 
So if hypothetically speaking I had already run 1300mV and it loaded at 38C, I could be safe up to what, 1400?
2010/12/07 16:49:43
johnksss
hold on there speed racer....lol
take baby steps from this point on...(1.3V and higher)
2010/12/07 17:47:34
Halo_003
Oh I've taken one step increments all the way up to 1300. I was more just wondering what the safety cap would be. I don't wanna burn..
2010/12/07 18:34:04
Halo_003
Well it looks like my CPU may not be total crap after all. Passing Vantage CPU test 1 @ 211x21 just now...
 
 
Looks like increasing QPI PLL Vcore helps.
2010/12/07 18:49:04
johnksss
cool deal!

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account