GFAFS
You seems quite happy to have a defective product and willing to spit on other manufacturers, good for you, some are not. Let's make a deal, leave a long happy life with what you've got, and let those who think that the situation unacceptable be.
Your argumentation have no weight unless you're an EVGA Official on that matter...we all now the harassment employees are ready to do to smooth and mitigate an issue during crisis (trolling, denying, etc)...quit pretending.
As for EVGA, I really would like to see some REAL OFFICIAL answer in HERE.
You got your official answer, TWICE as I recall. I find it pretty illogical to call a product defective when its still operating within spec. Thats your answer, what more do you want?
" On ACX 3.0, EVGA focused on GPU temperature and the lowest acoustic levels possible. Running Furmark, the GPU is around 70C +/- and the fan speed is running approximately 30% duty cycle or lower.
However, during recent testing, the thermal temperature of the PWM and memory, in extreme circumstances, was marginally within spec and needed to be addressed."
AND
"It's becoming a common refrain here, but let's make sure what we're talking about. EVGA has noted that the VRM area may get very warm under certain circumstances, but even then, we expect your card to work without issue. Some media outlets have used the term "overheating", but components still test within operating specs, even without the VBIOS or Thermal Pad Mod."
"As a result, there has been a lot of speculation by people that these temperatures a) are an issue, and b) the cause of a variety of graphics card problems people have seen or will see. Additionally, to figure out whether this is an "issue", many people have compared the designs of similar cards between EVGA and other manufacturers to determine if there is a deficiency in the cooling design.
EVGA went back and retested this card, using the same benchmark in ambient temperatures higher than Tom's Hardware did. Based on the results, although the temperatures were warm in similar areas compared to the review, everything tested within specs and tolerances for various components on the card. In other words, based on the results, the original design of the card is working as intended."