somethingc00l
V84x4
The biggest reason to use a Micro X99 over the only Mini X99 you show above (Only one in existence)
is because it dos NOT support "QUAD" channel RAM
So why have a X99 chipset if you can't have quad channel
Also........No M.2 support (Fastest Hard drive ever)
Also......... hardly NO over clocking support
Quad channel makes no performance difference and you can hit the CPU's max bandwidth anyway with overclocked dual channel. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2982965/components/quad-channel-ram-vs-dual-channel-ram-the-shocking-truth-about-their-performance.html
It does in fact have m.2, not sure how you missed that.
Not sure what you mean about overclocking either, it has fine overclocking support, plenty of people OC just fine with it.
First off I'm am sorry to the OP
I was just trying to explain to this guy why you would do such a thing.....It's quite Obvious !!!! and awesome !!!!
Like I said I've already done it and WOW......just sick
If (Somethingc00l) is really something c00l he would understand it and not questions why :-(
Soooooooo, to conclude your pissing match............
Looks like the OP knows CAD to me
In real life
with a 8 or 10 core processor, Quad channel is a Huge performance in video & Photo & yes CAD editing
and I know first hand because I own a design studio for 25 years now
www.graphXshop.comand switching to quad channel ram made a huge difference working with 5200 Pxls Large format prints
and 5 Gig MPG 4 video files..........HUGE difference
As for $260 for a
ASRock ????The EVGA Micro 2 is only $199 and the aesthetics are Way better
I close with this.........
What the OP has done is fantastic work and the wave of the future
You will start to see more and more systems like this as we head down the silicon road
Best Regards, Rick