2016/10/29 13:44:15
cheezwhizz
I didn't save a link from the latest run. I can rerun and include it in a little while.
2016/10/29 20:17:21
cheezwhizz
Here's the link for the latest run. It's not quite as high as earlier, but I don't have a link for that run. Still, this is almost 32,000.
 
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/15734083
 
I didn't do a reboot right before running this benchmark, so that could be why it's a few hundred points off, but still respectable.
2016/10/29 21:17:39
bcavnaugh
cheezwhizz
Here's the link for the latest run. It's not quite as high as earlier, but I don't have a link for that run. Still, this is almost 32,000.
 
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/15734083
 
I didn't do a reboot right before running this benchmark, so that could be why it's a few hundred points off, but still respectable.


Graphics Score 31893 is lower with this non-approved driver.
 
Graphics Score 32082 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/15723255 
2016/10/30 08:11:52
Dr.Death
I noticed this when I tried out on of the latest drivers   -  ''any'' oc of the card  my scores went down   at least 200 points   from the samw oc I used with a older driver ,BUT  the card at box stock settings   the scores went up over the older drivers  ???    so the  box stock card seemed to of helped but if applied any oc to the same card you loose  [using same oc profiles  used with older driver ]  ??   anyway that's what I see here on my system and card  ?   maybe some more of that NVidia gimping    if you ''adjust''  your card   out side of out of the box stock ???
12

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account