All this PPD talk got me to thinking about how the various cards I've folded with perform.  Then bcavaugh commented in some thread that he client stores old log files in the logs directory.  Hhhmmmm, data....
 
Well, I'm trying to brush up on my C# skills, so maybe I should put together a little log parser.  Well, I did.  Add a little Excel and...

• 1070 in a x16 PCIE 3.0 slot is humming along at 674k (it clocks 2002 MHz on it's own).  It's awesome, but there is a dumped WU in there that doesn't get added in.
• Over 16 WUs in a x16 PCIE 2.0 slot, the other 1070 gets about 625k (it clocks to 1976 MHz on it's own).  In a x1 (maybe x4 - I didn't actually look at it, the 1070 only gets 340k PPD)
• 980ti in an x4 PCIE 3.0 slot gets about 500K vs. the 625K in a x16 slot.  Those stats include over 1600 wu's, so they are probably pretty good.  It was overclocked part of the time, but stock most of the time.
• 950 gets about 145K'ish.  Kind of bummed I lost of log files for this card doing a reinstall without thinking.
• 750ti gets about 85k PPD.

Kind of a fun little project.

I was always curious about 1070 vs 980TI PPD comparison beyond what I see here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vcVoSVtamcoGj5sFfvKF_XlvuviWWveJIg_iZ8U2bf0/pub?output=html
Your chart is quite useful in that respect. Thanks!
 
 

That list is interesting.  Nearly all the 1070's on that list are running 2100MHz+.  My 980ti is running stock at about 1350MHz and looks like most of those on that list are running 1500MHz+.  My 980ti probably ran at 1500MHz for about half the units reported above.