ksgnow2010
If you read the page where you requested the pads, EVGA said that they were not required...but optional.
Optional means you don't need them to have your card work properly.
Well simply because EVGA state it's optional doesn't really mean it is. Sure they might be in a controlled test environment with a moderate ambient temp but that's hardly reflecting real world conditions.
Let's take a look at the results from the TomsHwardware 1080 review, keep in mind the results were taken with an ambient temp of 22°C (71°F). I'm not even going to start on the 1060's results which are worse!
Metro Last Light is topping 97°c (206.6°F) on the VRM which is definitely on the hot side but within specs.
Now take a look at the memory, 95°c (203°F) which is right on the thermal specifications limit and that's before any overclocking.
What do you think is going to happen when ambient temps exceed 22°C (71°F)? I'm sure a lot of users like myself live in countries where it's normal to see temperatures upwards of 30°C (86°F), 35°C (95°F) for extended periods of time. I can guarantee without a doubt the memory will be operating well above it's thermal specifications and potentially the VRM's. Sure if you live in an environment with a sub 22°C ambient environment you could easily class the thermal pads as being optional, but face it that's hardly the case for a lot of users.
These limits and specifications are set for a reason and operating above them is a no no and asking for prematurely dying components.
I'm not sure how EVGA or anyone else can consider them as being optional when tests show components are right on their thermal limits (and exceeding if you take into furmark results) with a relatively moderate ambient temp.