when are they available for sale?

@EVGA_JacobF, When will these be in stock on Amazon? They don't seem to be listed on the catalog just yet

Available at Newegg now, in stock at Amazon soon.

EVGA_JacobF
Available at Newegg now, in stock at Amazon soon.

Cool thanks for the update. :)

Hello EVGA forums
 
Yesterday I bought an EVGA GTX 1050 Ti SC for a SFF build where cable management and temperatures is crucially important factors. I have 2 questions regarding the 1050 Ti, as I haven't received it yet, and thus can't verify. The questions are:
 
1: I've read about the padding missing on the pascal line (1060, 1070 and 1080) on reddit.com/r/nvidia, and I'm now wondering if this is also the case on the 1050's. Are they shipping with thermal padding or do we have to add that ourselves? What happens to warranty if we mod the cards with thermal pads?
2: From what I understand, the 1050 Ti SC ships without a 0 Db fan mode. This is a big let-down for me, as I assumed it to be an industry standard at this point, more or less. Is there any plans on adding this feature through a VBIOS update?
 
Thanks in advance.

Found an interesting article about the 1050 lineup.  Why is it that the higher clocked SC is slower than all other cards in pretty much every test including synthetics?  Doesn't make sense to me but there must be a reason.  
 
http://www.hardwareasylum...050_roundup/page7.aspx

FscuderiaX
Found an interesting article about the 1050 lineup.  Why is it that the higher clocked SC is slower than all other cards in pretty much every test including synthetics?  Doesn't make sense to me but there must be a reason.  
 
http://www.hardwareasylum...050_roundup/page7.aspx

That entire test seems wrong. There's no reason there should be than much disparity between all the GPU's. They did something wrong.

HeavyHemi

FscuderiaX
Found an interesting article about the 1050 lineup.  Why is it that the higher clocked SC is slower than all other cards in pretty much every test including synthetics?  Doesn't make sense to me but there must be a reason.  
 
http://www.hardwareasylum...050_roundup/page7.aspx

That entire test seems wrong. There's no reason there should be than much disparity between all the GPU's. They did something wrong.

Well even if you don't take into account the Zotac results the SC is still slower than the rest.  I wonder what could the problem be?

FscuderiaX

HeavyHemi

FscuderiaX
Found an interesting article about the 1050 lineup.  Why is it that the higher clocked SC is slower than all other cards in pretty much every test including synthetics?  Doesn't make sense to me but there must be a reason.  
 
http://www.hardwareasylum...050_roundup/page7.aspx

That entire test seems wrong. There's no reason there should be than much disparity between all the GPU's. They did something wrong.

Well even if you don't take into account the Zotac results the SC is still slower than the rest.  I wonder what could the problem be?

FscuderiaX

HeavyHemi

FscuderiaX
Found an interesting article about the 1050 lineup.  Why is it that the higher clocked SC is slower than all other cards in pretty much every test including synthetics?  Doesn't make sense to me but there must be a reason.  
 
http://www.hardwareasylum...050_roundup/page7.aspx

That entire test seems wrong. There's no reason there should be than much disparity between all the GPU's. They did something wrong.

Well even if you don't take into account the Zotac results the SC is still slower than the rest.  I wonder what could the problem be?

That he screwed up running the benches. In the first example, the EVGA card is slightly faster and in Alien v Predator except for the Zotac.

Any news on Amazon availability?