2016/11/16 10:05:13
mektacular
FYI, my two 1070's are at 687K and 647K PPD over about 100 wu's each.  One runs at about 2002MHz and the other about 1974MHz.  Dedicated folding machine running Windows 10.  Each is in a PCIE 3.0 x8 slot.  PPD calculations according to HFM.
2016/11/16 10:30:43
notfordman
EllBrad
Also averaging 80-90% power and 93% usage on my 1070SC, driver 373.06
 
Correct me if I'm wrong but do the different FAHcores attributed to each WU kinda influence different GPU behaviors? I have had only 0x21 WU's for the last 3 days and not seeing quite the full GPU utilization




Yes ,they do. I am speaking generally GPU wise though. There were some in the past that, made the cards run warmer and also different utilization percentages, ect. 
2016/11/16 10:31:24
notfordman
mektacular
FYI, my two 1070's are at 687K and 647K PPD over about 100 wu's each.  One runs at about 2002MHz and the other about 1974MHz.  Dedicated folding machine running Windows 10.  Each is in a PCIE 3.0 x8 slot.  PPD calculations according to HFM.




That's each ,right mektacular? 
2016/11/16 10:37:03
mektacular
notfordman
mektacular
FYI, my two 1070's are at 687K and 647K PPD over about 100 wu's each.  One runs at about 2002MHz and the other about 1974MHz.  Dedicated folding machine running Windows 10.  Each is in a PCIE 3.0 x8 slot.  PPD calculations according to HFM.




That's each ,right mektacular? 


Yes, one got 687K and the other 647K.  They are both 1070 FTW Hybrids.
2016/11/19 02:48:48
pvr2002
Thanks for the info on the 1070 SC PPD.  I look forward to swapping out my 560TI for a 1070 soon.
2016/11/19 18:18:51
fofold8
does linux reallyh increase ppd I might try dual booting
2016/11/19 18:27:33
Chris21010
about as much as OCing in windows and to my knowledge OCing pascal in linux isnt possible.

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account