I think one possible problem could be that it won't crank up the fan speed based on GPU temps if you run it through the motherboard (unless the motherboard has some option to adjust fan speed based on GPU temps) so you'll likely have to manually set it. I'm guessing that unless you set the fan to a very low speed, temps are going to still be better than an air cooler however.
 
As for full coverage AIO, I recall there was a request for that when the first watercooled cards from EVGA was released (they weren't called Hydro-copper at the time, going full copper instead of copper/aluminum was another feedback based changed. So it's possible that might change in the future as it did with the watercooler.

Thanks, im aware of the possible problems with controlling the fans through the MB, but i was simply planning on using some low noise fans and run them as high as i can as long as they dont make to much noise, ive never liked the setup where the fans turn almost off during idle, so i always keep mine running as fast as i can, within acceptable noise levels :) i just wanted to hear from some officials that it woulden mess with the card when it suddenly had no radiator fan to control :)

z999z3mystorys
I think one possible problem could be that it won't crank up the fan speed based on GPU temps if you run it through the motherboard (unless the motherboard has some option to adjust fan speed based on GPU temps) so you'll likely have to manually set it. I'm guessing that unless you set the fan to a very low speed, temps are going to still be better than an air cooler however.
 
As for full coverage AIO, I recall there was a request for that when the first watercooled cards from EVGA was released (they weren't called Hydro-copper at the time, going full copper instead of copper/aluminum was another feedback based changed. So it's possible that might change in the future as it did with the watercooler.

my kraken x61 set up makes it to where i can make the fans go up with gpu tems,