EVGA

What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts?

Author
fabbasi
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1281
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2005/12/02 08:45:16
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
2017/01/06 19:47:32 (permalink)
I'm reading about the sata ports and m.2 conflicts with all manufacturers.
I have two m.2 sata SSD and 6 sata ports coming out of my drives.
Now I was hoping to move to z270 system but the max number of sata ports are 6 when compared to all brands and each manufacturer explicitly details when using either m.2 ports 1 or 5&6 will be disabled because of sharing lanes.
Now what could I do to ensure I use both m.2 sata SSD and all sata ports?
Suggestions?


 
#1

24 Replies Related Threads

    Nereus
    Captain Goodvibes
    • Total Posts : 18923
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/04/09 20:05:53
    • Location: Brooklyn, NYC.
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 58
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/06 20:24:02 (permalink)
     
    Is this because Intel keep releasing 16-lane CPUs rather than the 40 lanes they used to have on most chips?
     


      BUILD 1 2   |   MINI-ITX BUILD   |   MODSRIGS $1K WIN   |   HEATWARE 111-0-0   |   ASSOCIATE CODE CSKKXUT5Q9GVAFR

    #2
    HeavyHemi
    Insert Custom Title Here
    • Total Posts : 15665
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/11/28 20:31:42
    • Location: Western Washington
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 135
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/06 21:39:33 (permalink)
    This is more or less why I went with the X99. 40 real lanes, plus more 2.0 lanes plus 10 native 6G ports. I don't really like the trend of reducing storage options.

    EVGA X99 FTWK / i7 6850K @ 4.5ghz / RTX 3080Ti FTW Ultra / 32GB Corsair LPX 3600mhz / Samsung 850Pro 256GB / Be Quiet BN516 Straight Power 12-1000w 80 Plus Platinum / Window 10 Pro
     
    #3
    cateno
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 979
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/10/18 01:32:46
    • Location: Belgium
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/06 23:13:47 (permalink)
    hello
     
    on gigabyte Z270 gaming 9 and 8 is notified possible raid 0 with 2 port M2 pcie , not have the manual  to confirme this  is possible use a PLX chip
     

  •  

     
     
     
    Print

     
     

    • Supports 7th/ 6th Generation Intel® Core™ Processors
    • Dual Channel Non-ECC Unbuffered DDR4, 4 DIMMs
    • Intel® USB 3.1 Gen 2 with USB Type-C™ and Type-A
    • 4-Way Graphics Support with Dual Armor and Ultra Durable™ Design
    • EKWB G-Frost Hybrid Water Block
    • Triple NVMe PCIe SSDs in RAID 0 Support
    • Dual NVMe PCIe Gen3 x4 U.2 Connectors
    • Dual Ultra-Fast M.2 with PCIe Gen3 x4 & SATA interface
    • Intel® Optane™ Memory Ready
    • Creative Sound Blaster certified ZxRi 120dB+ Audio
    • Killer DoubleShot-X3™ Pro for the best networking experience possible
    • USB DAC-UP 2 with Adjustable Voltage
    • RGB FUSION with Multi-Zone LED Light Show design
    • Swappable Overlay for Accent LED
    • Smart Fan 5 features Multiple Temperature Sensors and Hybrid Fan Headers
    • 2 External Thermistors Headers with 2 Included Thermistors
    • Extreme 40 Gb/s Thunderbolt™ 3
    • Integrated HDMI 2.0 Support
    • GIGABYTE UEFI DualBIOS™ with Q-Flash Plus USB Port
    • APP Center Including EasyTune™ and Cloud Station™ Utilities

     
    post edited by cateno - 2017/01/06 23:16:07

  • Z690 classified start build
     
    X299 DARK  7900X 7740x soon 7980X
    X299 APEX
    X299 rampage Extreme
     
    E762 W3520@4.2  E679 2600k
    E760 X980 
    E761 I920
    E770 I950
    and SR2's  and SRX's
    Z87 classified , MVIE built with 4770K
    Z97 classified , ftw Z97 ,  MFVII  only wait for gigabyte LN2 
    X99 series.... classified , FTW , RE5 , oc formula, profesional , X11 , soc force , msi gaming9ack

    X79 classified, dark and RIVE, RIVBE,, xtreme11
    and many classified a panel from EVGA  no just one sample

    and other  DFI giga etc  

    #4
    SuperConker
    iCX Member
    • Total Posts : 270
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/22 14:55:25
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/07 03:05:37 (permalink)
    Perhaps the upcoming Intel X299 (Socket LGA 2066) motherboards would be a better choice,
    as they probably won't have this limit (X99 doesn't have this limitation either).
     
    It says here they should be released in the second half of 2017:
    http://ocaholic.ch/module...icle.php?storyid=15669
    post edited by SuperConker - 2017/01/07 03:09:11


    #5
    rjohnson11
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 102278
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2004/10/05 12:44:35
    • Location: Netherlands
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 84
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/07 05:06:07 (permalink)
    SuperConker
    Perhaps the upcoming Intel X299 (Socket LGA 2066) motherboards would be a better choice,
    as they probably won't have this limit (X99 doesn't have this limitation either).
     
    It says here they should be released in the second half of 2017:
    http://ocaholic.ch/module...icle.php?storyid=15669


    +1 on this. Skylake-X might be better but that all depends on how many resources are being shared on the motherboard.

    AMD Ryzen 9 7950X,  Corsair Mp700 Pro M.2, 64GB Corsair Dominator Titanium DDR5  X670E Steel Legend, MSI RTX 4090 Associate Code: H5U80QBH6BH0AXF. I am NOT an employee of EVGA

    #6
    Airwolf24
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 202
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/24 07:46:49
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 2
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/07 10:46:47 (permalink)
    I found the manual for the EVGA Z270 FTW-K and it's on page 26


    Link: http://www.evga.com/suppo.../files/132-KS-E277.pdf
    post edited by Airwolf24 - 2017/01/07 10:49:56

    Attached Image(s)


    R9-5900X (PBO2, curve optimizer -15, +200MHz) 
    G.SKILL TridentZ RGB DDR4 32GB (2x16GB) 1.35v @3600MHz
    EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 12GB FTW (Nvidia Driver V536.40)
    Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master (Rev 1.2) (Bios: F37c)
    WD Black SN850X 4TB SSD
    EVGA SuperNOVA 850W G2 PSU
    Corsair H115i RGB Platinum
    EVGA Z15 (cherry mx brown switch mod) Keyboard
    ASUS TUF VG28UQL1A

    Associate code: IFDS2OB0MO06ULW
    Affiliate Code: GK750VPSU9
    #7
    Fewmets
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 37
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/07/07 15:32:05
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/11 09:15:45 (permalink)
    The z270 Classified K has 8 SATA ports, 4 off the chipset plus four off a Marvell controller, and only two of which are shared with an M.2 slot (2/3 are shared with the 80mm slot).

    The 110mm M.2 slot is shared only with the U.2 port so won't conflict.

    If you're just worried about plugging in 6 SATA devices and two M.2 devices, then the Z270 Classified K would work.
    #8
    kougar
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 3034
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/05/08 10:11:19
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 22
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/12 14:44:07 (permalink)
    Nice find Airwolf! 
     
    Unfortunately yes, this is commonplace for Z270 boards. If ya really need that many SATA / M.2 ports then you will probably want X299 to avoid the problem. Or wait for ASRock to develop something, they've been known to add additional chips and go crazy with the port offerings on some models.


    Have water, will cool. 
    #9
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 38977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 282
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/12 14:50:37 (permalink)
    rjohnson11
    SuperConker
    Perhaps the upcoming Intel X299 (Socket LGA 2066) motherboards would be a better choice,
    as they probably won't have this limit (X99 doesn't have this limitation either).
     
    It says here they should be released in the second half of 2017:
    http://ocaholic.ch/module...icle.php?storyid=15669


    +1 on this. Skylake-X might be better but that all depends on how many resources are being shared on the motherboard.


    I am praying that the new CPU is not locked down to Only Windows 10 on the X299 Platform.

    Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


     
    #10
    knightsilver
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 9430
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/11/21 13:42:06
    • Location: Nebraska
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 14
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/12 20:29:51 (permalink)
    last pic, bottom of page:
    http://techreport.com/review/31172/msi-z270-gaming-pro-carbon-motherboard-reviewed
     
    Depending on cost of eVGA'a, Ill most likely go with an MSI board.
    #11
    Nereus
    Captain Goodvibes
    • Total Posts : 18923
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/04/09 20:05:53
    • Location: Brooklyn, NYC.
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 58
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/12 21:24:09 (permalink)
     
    The Kaby Lake CPU provides 16 lanes, the Z270 chipset provides 14 lanes (as opposed to the Z170 having 10 lanes I think).
    more info.
     


      BUILD 1 2   |   MINI-ITX BUILD   |   MODSRIGS $1K WIN   |   HEATWARE 111-0-0   |   ASSOCIATE CODE CSKKXUT5Q9GVAFR

    #12
    MSim
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 14686
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2005/05/22 23:13:30
    • Location: Earth
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 38
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/12 22:39:34 (permalink)
    bcavnaugh
    rjohnson11
    SuperConker
    Perhaps the upcoming Intel X299 (Socket LGA 2066) motherboards would be a better choice,
    as they probably won't have this limit (X99 doesn't have this limitation either).
     
    It says here they should be released in the second half of 2017:
    http://ocaholic.ch/module...icle.php?storyid=15669


    +1 on this. Skylake-X might be better but that all depends on how many resources are being shared on the motherboard.


    I am praying that the new CPU is not locked down to Only Windows 10 on the X299 Platform.




    Wonder how much LGA 2066 CPU's will cost.


     
    #13
    fabbasi
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1281
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2005/12/02 08:45:16
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/13 00:12:50 (permalink)
    Nereus
     
    The Kaby Lake CPU provides 16 lanes, the Z270 chipset provides 14 lanes (as opposed to the Z170 having 10 lanes I think).
    more info.
     

    Yes thank you that helped. Got my gear setup and fired!!!
    All sata ports work flawless with M.2 SSD installed.
    Thank you guys... one more thing Z170 boards blow chunks!!!!


     
    #14
    007vsMagua
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1677
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/09/10 16:47:30
    • Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/13 10:31:12 (permalink)
    bcavnaugh

    I am praying that the new CPU is not locked down to Only Windows 10 on the X299 Platform.


    I know how you feel. To do my upcoming Z270 build I'm going to have to leave my beloved 7 behind. But then again, isn't 10 designed to work better with the latest chips? What about DX?

    "Life is like stepping onto a boat which is about to sail out to Sea and sink." _Shunryu Suzuki Roshi
     
    EVGA __ RTX 3070 FTW Super   ---   INTEL __ i7-7700K 
    MSI __ Z270 Gaming M7   ---  GSKILL __ 16GB TridentZ 3200
    NZXT __ Kraken X62 / HUE+ / GRID+ v2 / AER Fans x2 / USB Hub
    SAMSUNG  __ 850 EVO 500GB   ---   WD  __  1TB Black / 1TB Blue 
    EVGA  __ 850 G3   ---   NZXT  __  S340 Elite (White)  -  [/siz
    #15
    Airwolf24
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 202
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/24 07:46:49
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 2
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/13 14:38:52 (permalink)
    kougar
    Nice find Airwolf! 
     
    Unfortunately yes, this is commonplace for Z270 boards. If ya really need that many SATA / M.2 ports then you will probably want X299 to avoid the problem. Or wait for ASRock to develop something, they've been known to add additional chips and go crazy with the port offerings on some models.


    thanks :), also on the 270 FTW-K manual doesn't say what the M.2 shares when in PCI-E mode but I probably think from the chipset 

    R9-5900X (PBO2, curve optimizer -15, +200MHz) 
    G.SKILL TridentZ RGB DDR4 32GB (2x16GB) 1.35v @3600MHz
    EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 12GB FTW (Nvidia Driver V536.40)
    Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master (Rev 1.2) (Bios: F37c)
    WD Black SN850X 4TB SSD
    EVGA SuperNOVA 850W G2 PSU
    Corsair H115i RGB Platinum
    EVGA Z15 (cherry mx brown switch mod) Keyboard
    ASUS TUF VG28UQL1A

    Associate code: IFDS2OB0MO06ULW
    Affiliate Code: GK750VPSU9
    #16
    HarryD
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1158
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/09/28 09:23:13
    • Location: Connecticut
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/13 14:54:34 (permalink)
    HeavyHemi
    This is more or less why I went with the X99. 40 real lanes, plus more 2.0 lanes plus 10 native 6G ports. I don't really like the trend of reducing storage options.


    That's also why I went with X99.

    EVGA X99 Classified
    Intel i7-5960X
    64GB Corsair Dominator 2400MHz DDR4
     
    #17
    Nereus
    Captain Goodvibes
    • Total Posts : 18923
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/04/09 20:05:53
    • Location: Brooklyn, NYC.
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 58
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/14 21:30:09 (permalink)
     
    Z270 Classified is wired quite differently from Z270 FTW. In the Classified:
     
    If you use the 80/110mm m.2 port (basically sits under your GPU in PCIe slot 1) then that one conflicts only with the u.2 port, so you're good to go on that unless you're using a u.2 drive (which are expensive as hell), and all 4 of your SATA ports will be good to go as well (or more if you want to use Marvell...)
     
    The 80mm m.2 lower port conflicts with SATA ports 2 & 3 (or all PCI-express SATA), so if you use that lower m.2 port, you are limited to only SATA ports 0 and 1 ...unless you activate the Marvell SATA ports, which most people want to avoid, lol.
     
    I usually use a primary SSD for the o/s, a second for games, a third for media and all sorts of crap I don't access as much, then a fourth mech drive for backup.
     
    My question for any EVGA tech looking at this : the m.2 Samsung 960 Pro has awesome speed BUT they will throttle when put under a heavy load. When that happens, the speed of the drive is greatly reduced and in a worst case situation may even end up slower than a standard SATA-based SSD due to their thermal management measures (link). If I plonk a 960 Pro in the m.2 port under the top GPU (in the Z270 Classified), I would think it's going to get pretty toasty under there, and may result on throttling ...but if I move it to the lower m.2 slot where it's a bit cooler (I'm not going to run SLI), I knock out SATA ports 2 and 3, limiting my options or having to turn on the Marvell SATA ports... which I'd prefer not to do. Has EVGA done any testing on how hot a Samsung Pro in that upper m.2 port may get with a GPU covering it?
     
    Ideally I would have done it the other way around, since I doubt I'll be using u.2 but I'd usually use 3 SATA ports plus 1 m.2 port... but that's just me.
     
     
     
     
     
     
    post edited by Nereus - 2017/01/14 21:40:20


      BUILD 1 2   |   MINI-ITX BUILD   |   MODSRIGS $1K WIN   |   HEATWARE 111-0-0   |   ASSOCIATE CODE CSKKXUT5Q9GVAFR

    #18
    hypergreatthing
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 1
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2017/01/19 11:13:05
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/19 11:16:00 (permalink)
    NereusMy question for any EVGA tech looking at this : the m.2 Samsung 960 Pro has awesome speed BUT they will throttle when put under a heavy load. When that happens, the speed of the drive is greatly reduced and in a worst case situation may even end up slower than a standard SATA-based SSD due to their thermal management measures (). If I plonk a 960 Pro in the m.2 port under the top GPU (in the Z270 Classified), I would think it's going to get pretty toasty under there, and may result on throttling ...but if I move it to the lower m.2 slot where it's a bit cooler (I'm not going to run SLI), I knock out SATA ports 2 and 3, limiting my options or having to turn on the Marvell SATA ports... which I'd prefer not to do. Has EVGA done any testing on how hot a Samsung Pro in that upper m.2 port may get with a GPU covering it?
     
    Ideally I would have done it the other way around, since I doubt I'll be using u.2 but I'd usually use 3 SATA ports plus 1 m.2 port... but that's just me.

    I'm not a evga tech, but i did see they make m.2 to u.2 adapters.  You could just move the 960 pro to a drive bay that's near a case fan thus giving it proper ventilation.
    The adapter i'm talking about is something like this: 
    While m.2 is neat since it goes on the motherboards and it's great for compact builds, placement and heat will always be an issue.
    #19
    Nereus
    Captain Goodvibes
    • Total Posts : 18923
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/04/09 20:05:53
    • Location: Brooklyn, NYC.
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 58
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/19 18:35:39 (permalink)
     
    u.2 to m.2 adapter.. good point. Thanks.
     


      BUILD 1 2   |   MINI-ITX BUILD   |   MODSRIGS $1K WIN   |   HEATWARE 111-0-0   |   ASSOCIATE CODE CSKKXUT5Q9GVAFR

    #20
    MSim
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 14686
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2005/05/22 23:13:30
    • Location: Earth
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 38
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/20 04:32:44 (permalink)
    Nereus
     
    u.2 to m.2 adapter.. good point. Thanks.
     


    If you don't mind paying like $40-52 for that adapter.
     
    I wonder if small passive heat sinks would help reduce throttling. Is there enough clearance to avoid blocking the GPU from latching and sit down all the way.  It could be a pain to remove the heat sink, if you ever need to do a RMA. 
     

     
     
     
     
     


     
    #21
    Fewmets
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 37
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/07/07 15:32:05
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/20 08:42:31 (permalink)
    Honestly wouldn't having a reference GPU over the m.2 drive help with cooling it? I mean for cards with a blower style fan? The blower fan would, at least in theory, draw cool air over the IHS of the m.2 drive and exhaust the warmer air away from the drive, helping to cool it.

    Of course that only applies to blower style cards, but still.
    #22
    somethingc00l
    EGC Admin
    • Total Posts : 752
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/03/14 13:44:57
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 11
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/20 14:15:05 (permalink)
    Nereus
     the m.2 Samsung 960 Pro has awesome speed BUT they will throttle when put under a heavy load. When that happens, the speed of the drive is greatly reduced and in a worst case situation may even end up slower than a standard SATA-based SSD due to their thermal management measures (link).   

    "To put this into perspective, since the 960 Pro took 130 seconds to throttle and has a sequential read speed of ~3.5 GB/s, you should be able to read about 455 GB worth of data at full speed before the 960 Pro throttles down to "only" ~2.6 GB/s."
     
    I mean is that really an issue you will ever run into with desktop usage? And no, none of their scenarios show slower than SATA drives.
    post edited by somethingc00l - 2017/01/20 14:17:44
    #23
    Fewmets
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 37
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/07/07 15:32:05
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/01/21 17:45:20 (permalink)
    somethingc00l
    Nereus
     the m.2 Samsung 960 Pro has awesome speed BUT they will throttle when put under a heavy load. When that happens, the speed of the drive is greatly reduced and in a worst case situation may even end up slower than a standard SATA-based SSD due to their thermal management measures (link).   

    "To put this into perspective, since the 960 Pro took 130 seconds to throttle and has a sequential read speed of ~3.5 GB/s, you should be able to read about 455 GB worth of data at full speed before the 960 Pro throttles down to "only" ~2.6 GB/s."
     
    I mean is that really an issue you will ever run into with desktop usage? And no, none of their scenarios show slower than SATA drives.


    Yes. It will be an issue I run into in 40 years when I'm watching my uncompressed 16k480fps HDR20 videos, okay? XD
    #24
    waleedws
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 11
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/02/05 11:36:09
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: What's with m.2 and sata port conflicts? 2017/02/01 15:42:09 (permalink)
    Another option is to use this Asus board Z270-WS, its not released yet and no info on pricing.

    Hdmi 2.0, quad SLI, 1 x M.2 x4 Socket 3, with M key, type 2242/2260/2280/22110 storage devices support (PCIE 3.0 x 4 mode)
    Looks promising
     
    #25
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile