Helpful ReplyWARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM!

Page: < 123 > Showing page 2 of 3
Author
BigBrother
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 107
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/03/21 04:54:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2010/05/10 05:10:48 (permalink) ☄ Helpful

[ For anyone reading this: We're now comparing the X-series vs the E-series of Westmere Xeons, in case you're confused. It's a bit off-topic, but still relevant. You still only need to read post 1, unless you're planning to get one of the "E" (economy) CPUs. ]

Actually, it's likely that the lower-powered E-series of CPUs will downclock the RAM to 800 MHz when using 2 sticks per channel (1066 -> 800). I haven't seen any specifications regarding that, but that's how the higher-powered models work when expanding the number of DIMMs per channel.

Here's something so you can compare between E5640:
http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=47923

And X5650:
http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=47922

The clock speed is the same between these two (both have a 20x multiplier giving us 20x133 = 2.66 GHz each).

Differences: Number of cores (6 vs 4), QPI link speed (6.4 GT/s vs 5.87 GT/s), maximum memory rate (1333 vs 1066), and maximum memory bandwidth (32 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).

Try to find a benchmark of the E-series, and consider getting 1x X5650 for now, it's a whole extra 2 cores per CPU (4 logical) and would last longer. :-) The price is the same as two of the cheaper CPUs, you gain 6 (faster) cores instead of 8, and have the option to expand to two CPUs as soon as you can afford it.



Edit: Also, the Westmere Xeons aren't in full production yet. They are still trickling out from Intel which keeps the price at a premium. Intel has informed its distribution networks that the 6 core Xeon will only be available in limited quantity until at the end of the second quarter. It's likely that prices will drop a little in Q3 (July+).
post edited by BigBrother - 2010/05/10 05:32:44
#31
stephan-as-ice
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 183
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/02/20 04:55:27
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2010/05/10 08:13:57 (permalink)
Prices did not fall since march 16th. Xeon is still @ 900€. It took 3 weeks from order to shipping on mine.

EVGA Classified SR-2 (A56)--- 2x EVGA GTX Titan ---2x Xeon 5650 ---2x Crucial M4 ---96GB Kingston Reg 1600 CL11 --- Corsair AX1200i 1200W --- LianLi AX75 --- MO-RA 3Pro --- all @ full water  --- NEC PA271W + Dell U2711

EVGA Classified SR-2 (A56)--- 1x EVGA GTX 680 ---2x Xeon 5650 ---1x Crucial M500 ---48GB Kingston Reg 1600 CL11 --- Corsair AX860i 860W --- LianLi AX75 --- MO-RA 3Pro --- all @ full water
#32
EX3CUT1ON
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 182
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/01/18 08:46:40
  • Location: United Kingdom
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2010/05/10 09:42:47 (permalink)
So have I understood it correctly that you can fill all 12 memory slots on the SR-2 with memory and as long as the memory is dual ranked it will run at 1333MHz without overclocking?
#33
nullack
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 207
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/05/05 18:55:05
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2010/05/10 18:37:40 (permalink)
Thanks again for the info mate :)

With raising the bclk its my understanding the uncore clock, qpi clock and memory clock all raise. So, an oc with two 5630s should bring it back into line with 1333mhz and the 6.4 qpi rate, all at stockish clocks except for the bclk.

Anyway, some sacrifice on mem speed isnt much of a compromise for getting two physical cores and four logical cores extra for the same cost as on X5650 :)

I'm interested in any benchmarks on server/workstation mem speeds - googling now but if anyone can share one please do.

execution youll only get 1333mhz stock if you buy the higher end processes the cheaper ones dont do it stock.
#34
BigBrother
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 107
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/03/21 04:54:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2010/05/10 22:19:16 (permalink)
EX3CUT1ON
So have I understood it correctly that you can fill all 12 memory slots on the SR-2 with memory and as long as the memory is dual ranked it will run at 1333MHz without overclocking?


Sorry to say it but you've misunderstood. Each processor has 3 memory channels. The highest-end Xeons are used in all the examples, and they support the memory speeds 800, 1066 and 1333 MHz without overclocking. If you put in 6 sticks (3 per processor, 1 per channel), each stick will operate at 1333 MHz. If you put in 12 sticks (6 per processor, 2 per channel) then the processor will lower the RAM multiplier, operating your 1333 MHz-capable RAM at 1066 MHz instead.

That's it for the memory rate part of your question.

As for how to utilize 100% of the memory bandwidth that 1333 MHz offers, read the part of the first post that says "Now, if we want 1333 MHz bandwidth out of all sticks, we have two options:", which expains your options when it comes to squeezing all the juice out of the memory bus and getting the most bandwidth out of your RAM. It can be done in two ways; by choosing between either 6x dual ranked and no overclocking, or 12x single ranked and overclocking the base clock from 133 to 166 MHz (which not only speeds up your RAM again, but makes your processor 25% faster). Either choice will give you the desired result (1333 MHz rate and utilizing the entire available memory bandwidth for each processor, giving you the best memory transfer speeds). For further details, re-read the first post, hopefully it became clearer now. :-) I'd go with option #2, 12 single-ranked sticks and overclocking, since it gives you the best CPU performance. When overclocking, it's beneficial to populate all slots since the lowered RAM multiplier helps you overclock everything without clocking the RAM higher than it can handle. For instance, at just 3 sticks per processor and a 133 -> 166 BCLK overclock, you will take your 1333 MHz RAM to ~1660 MHz, which may damage it or at least be very unstable since the memory chips won't be rated for a timing that high, that's why 12x single ranked is the best for this overclocking example, as filling each slot lowers the RAM multiplier letting us overclock the CPU further without taking the RAM out of spec. You mentioned in another thread that you're new to building computers, so please excuse me if this isn't clear enough. 


nullack 
Thanks again for the info mate :) 


With raising the bclk its my understanding the uncore clock, qpi clock and memory clock all raise. So, an oc with two 5630s should bring it back into line with 1333mhz and the 6.4 qpi rate, all at stockish clocks except for the bclk. 

Anyway, some sacrifice on mem speed isnt much of a compromise for getting two physical cores and four logical cores extra for the same cost as on X5650 :) 
 

Yeah, pretty much all clocks in the system derive from the bus/base clock, which is 133 MHz. The SR-2 lets us overclock this, which will raise everything that derives from it (such as RAM and CPUs). Uncore is locked to a 20x multiplier on all Westmeres (at least that's the multiplier that the highest end models use; lower end models may use a lower uncore multiplier). For anyone wondering, Uncore is basically the clock for everything inside the CPU that isn't a core. It's logical that QPI would go up too since it has to derive from either the CPU or bus clocks.


Indeed, it'd be fun to see if there are any benchmarks comparing the "e" economy and "x" models.

post edited by BigBrother - 2010/05/10 22:35:28
#35
AutomatedBeef
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 222
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/04/24 12:20:09
  • Location: Fort Pierce FL
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2010/05/10 23:33:56 (permalink)
read my post on page 1 and relize that none of this matters

 

   

 
#36
EX3CUT1ON
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 182
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/01/18 08:46:40
  • Location: United Kingdom
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2010/05/11 00:44:39 (permalink)
BigBrother

EX3CUT1ON
So have I understood it correctly that you can fill all 12 memory slots on the SR-2 with memory and as long as the memory is dual ranked it will run at 1333MHz without overclocking?


Sorry to say it but you've misunderstood. Each processor has 3 memory channels. The highest-end Xeons are used in all the examples, and they support the memory speeds 800, 1066 and 1333 MHz without overclocking. If you put in 6 sticks (3 per processor, 1 per channel), each stick will operate at 1333 MHz. If you put in 12 sticks (6 per processor, 2 per channel) then the processor will lower the RAM multiplier, operating your 1333 MHz-capable RAM at 1066 MHz instead.

That's it for the memory rate part of your question.

As for how to utilize 100% of the memory bandwidth that 1333 MHz offers, read the part of the first post that says "Now, if we want 1333 MHz bandwidth out of all sticks, we have two options:", which expains your options when it comes to squeezing all the juice out of the memory bus and getting the most bandwidth out of your RAM. It can be done in two ways; by choosing between either 6x dual ranked and no overclocking, or 12x single ranked and overclocking the base clock from 133 to 166 MHz (which not only speeds up your RAM again, but makes your processor 25% faster). Either choice will give you the desired result (1333 MHz rate and utilizing the entire available memory bandwidth for each processor, giving you the best memory transfer speeds). For further details, re-read the first post, hopefully it became clearer now. :-) I'd go with option #2, 12 single-ranked sticks and overclocking, since it gives you the best CPU performance. When overclocking, it's beneficial to populate all slots since the lowered RAM multiplier helps you overclock everything without clocking the RAM higher than it can handle. For instance, at just 3 sticks per processor and a 133 -> 166 BCLK overclock, you will take your 1333 MHz RAM to ~1660 MHz, which may damage it or at least be very unstable since the memory chips won't be rated for a timing that high, that's why 12x single ranked is the best for this overclocking example, as filling each slot lowers the RAM multiplier letting us overclock the CPU further without taking the RAM out of spec. You mentioned in another thread that you're new to building computers, so please excuse me if this isn't clear enough. 

 
What if I'm using 12 sticks of dual ranked memory apose to single ranked will I still be able to overclock the baseclock the same since I want to get some Corsair Dominator GT memory which is only dual ranked?
#37
BigBrother
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 107
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/03/21 04:54:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2010/05/11 01:03:04 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
AutomatedBeef
 read my post on page 1 and relize that none of this matters



It doesn't work like that. Let's take it from the top:

Each processor contains its own memory controller which can handle a total of 32 GB/s across its three channels.

32 GB/s divided by three memory channels = 32/3 = A maximum supported bandwidth of ~10.66 GB/s per channel, for each processor.


Now, how do we apply that in order to get the highest possible bandwidth?

Well, for starters, the theoretical maximum transfer rate of 1333 MHz DDR3 is 10.6 GB/s.

However, we won't achieve such a high bandwidth with a single, single-ranked stick per channel.


There are two ways:

* Either put in 6x dual-ranked 1333 MHz DIMMs; three per processor (one per memory channel for each processor) and don't overclock, since you're only using a single DIMM per channel, which allows the processor to run them all at 1333 MHz. Why Dual-ranked DIMMs? Well, dual-ranked DIMMs are DIMMs which contain two separate banks of memory chips on a single memory stick. The processor can't access both banks at once, but the additional bank lets it queue an additional command while waiting for one to finish. This allows you to utilize 100% of the available memory bandwidth per channel. Downsides: If you overclock the BCLK, you'll raise the speed of the RAM too much since it's using a high multiplier.

* The other, better way is to put in 12x single-ranked 1333 MHz DIMMs; six per processor (two per memory channel for each processor), the processors will lower the RAM multiplier to give you a 1066 MHz rate for each stick, since you've now populated more than one DIMM per channel. If you were to leave it like this, you would be achieving 91% memory bandwidth utilization. The next step is to overclock the BCLK from 133 to 166 MHz, which raises your RAM back up to ~1330 MHz. This increase in memory rate raises the bandwidth, allowing you to utilize 99% of the bandwidth capacity of the highest-end Westmere Xeons, giving you the same effect as 6x dual-rank DIMMs, but with the added benefit of overclockability and memory capacity (thanks to using 12 sticks).


Which path you choose is up to you. If you don't care about using 100% of the Xeon's available memory bandwidth capacity, then do anything you want. These are just the two ways to achieve really great memory performance, which translates to higher number crunching speed in applications that work heavily with RAM.

Note that lower-end Westmere Xeons have lower maximum bandwidth capacity per processor.
#38
BigBrother
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 107
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/03/21 04:54:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2010/05/11 01:13:03 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
EX3CUT1ON  
What if I'm using 12 sticks of dual ranked memory apose to single ranked will I still be able to overclock the baseclock the same since I want to get some Corsair Dominator GT memory which is only dual ranked?



If you use 12 sticks of dual-ranked memory, the following will happen:

Your RAM multiplier will lower, taking the 1333 MHz RAM to 1066 MHz. If you were to leave it like this, you would be able to utilize 92% of the maximum memory bandwidth capacity of the Xeons (1% more than 2x single-ranked per channel at 1066 MHz).

Next, do the 133 -> 166 MHz BCLK overclock, which takes your 1066 MHz sticks back up to ~1330 MHz. Now, your memory will be capable of feeding the CPU 102% of its maximum memory bandwidth capacity (3% more than 2x overclocked single-ranked per channel).

Of course, the CPU can't make use of 102%. It'll run at 100%.

The difference between 12x single-ranked at 99% or 12x dual-ranked at 100% is pretty much unmeasurable.
When going for 12 sticks and overclocking, get whichever is cheapest (single or dual ranked) of the memory brand and capacity that you want. :-) Latency will be a tiny bit higher with 2x dual-ranked sticks due to the switching between 4 memory chip banks (2 per DIMM), but the extra bandwidth that this provides makes up for it. With 2x single-ranked sticks per channel, the CPU only has to switch between 2 memory chip banks (1 per DIMM). It's negligible, so just get whichever is cheapest.
post edited by BigBrother - 2010/05/11 01:17:57
#39
stephan-as-ice
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 183
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/02/20 04:55:27
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2010/05/11 02:32:39 (permalink)
Very good to know!
And what happens if you stick 12x 1600Mhz doubleside modules in? Can you clock higher? Like BCLK 133 -> 180/200

EDIT

So actually only 3,3Ghz for 5650s if your calc is right.
post edited by stephan-as-ice - 2010/05/11 09:15:26

EVGA Classified SR-2 (A56)--- 2x EVGA GTX Titan ---2x Xeon 5650 ---2x Crucial M4 ---96GB Kingston Reg 1600 CL11 --- Corsair AX1200i 1200W --- LianLi AX75 --- MO-RA 3Pro --- all @ full water  --- NEC PA271W + Dell U2711

EVGA Classified SR-2 (A56)--- 1x EVGA GTX 680 ---2x Xeon 5650 ---1x Crucial M500 ---48GB Kingston Reg 1600 CL11 --- Corsair AX860i 860W --- LianLi AX75 --- MO-RA 3Pro --- all @ full water
#40
EX3CUT1ON
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 182
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/01/18 08:46:40
  • Location: United Kingdom
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2010/05/11 05:56:46 (permalink)
BigBrother

EX3CUT1ON  
What if I'm using 12 sticks of dual ranked memory apose to single ranked will I still be able to overclock the baseclock the same since I want to get some Corsair Dominator GT memory which is only dual ranked?



If you use 12 sticks of dual-ranked memory, the following will happen:

Your RAM multiplier will lower, taking the 1333 MHz RAM to 1066 MHz. If you were to leave it like this, you would be able to utilize 92% of the maximum memory bandwidth capacity of the Xeons (1% more than 2x single-ranked per channel at 1066 MHz).

Next, do the 133 -> 166 MHz BCLK overclock, which takes your 1066 MHz sticks back up to ~1330 MHz. Now, your memory will be capable of feeding the CPU 102% of its maximum memory bandwidth capacity (3% more than 2x overclocked single-ranked per channel).

Of course, the CPU can't make use of 102%. It'll run at 100%.

The difference between 12x single-ranked at 99% or 12x dual-ranked at 100% is pretty much unmeasurable.
When going for 12 sticks and overclocking, get whichever is cheapest (single or dual ranked) of the memory brand and capacity that you want. :-) Latency will be a tiny bit higher with 2x dual-ranked sticks due to the switching between 4 memory chip banks (2 per DIMM), but the extra bandwidth that this provides makes up for it. With 2x single-ranked sticks per channel, the CPU only has to switch between 2 memory chip banks (1 per DIMM). It's negligible, so just get whichever is cheapest.


Thanks again BigBrrother.
#41
AutomatedBeef
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 222
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/04/24 12:20:09
  • Location: Fort Pierce FL
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2010/05/11 20:29:30 (permalink)
BigBrother

AutomatedBeef
read my post on page 1 and relize that none of this matters



It doesn't work like that. Let's take it from the top:

Each processor contains its own memory controller which can handle a total of 32 GB/s across its three channels.

32 GB/s divided by three memory channels = 32/3 = A maximum supported bandwidth of ~10.66 GB/s per channel, for each processor.


Now, how do we apply that in order to get the highest possible bandwidth?

Well, for starters, the theoretical maximum transfer rate of 1333 MHz DDR3 is 10.6 GB/s.

However, we won't achieve such a high bandwidth with a single, single-ranked stick per channel.


There are two ways:

* Either put in 6x dual-ranked 1333 MHz DIMMs; three per processor (one per memory channel for each processor) and don't overclock, since you're only using a single DIMM per channel, which allows the processor to run them all at 1333 MHz. Why Dual-ranked DIMMs? Well, dual-ranked DIMMs are DIMMs which contain two separate banks of memory chips on a single memory stick. The processor can't access both banks at once, but the additional bank lets it queue an additional command while waiting for one to finish. This allows you to utilize 100% of the available memory bandwidth per channel. Downsides: If you overclock the BCLK, you'll raise the speed of the RAM too much since it's using a high multiplier.

* The other, better way is to put in 12x single-ranked 1333 MHz DIMMs; six per processor (two per memory channel for each processor), the processors will lower the RAM multiplier to give you a 1066 MHz rate for each stick, since you've now populated more than one DIMM per channel. If you were to leave it like this, you would be achieving 91% memory bandwidth utilization. The next step is to overclock the BCLK from 133 to 166 MHz, which raises your RAM back up to ~1330 MHz. This increase in memory rate raises the bandwidth, allowing you to utilize 99% of the bandwidth capacity of the highest-end Westmere Xeons, giving you the same effect as 6x dual-rank DIMMs, but with the added benefit of overclockability and memory capacity (thanks to using 12 sticks).


Which path you choose is up to you. If you don't care about using 100% of the Xeon's available memory bandwidth capacity, then do anything you want. These are just the two ways to achieve really great memory performance, which translates to higher number crunching speed in applications that work heavily with RAM.

Note that lower-end Westmere Xeons have lower maximum bandwidth capacity per processor.


i love how your own logic proves you wrong you may only get 10.66 gb/s per chanel so 2 stikes at 8 or so gb/s = 16gb/s total wich will max the chanel bandwith

 

   

 
#42
leakyboat
New Member
  • Total Posts : 16
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/04/05 08:19:23
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2010/05/14 22:34:46 (permalink)
Here's an Intel 5600 series datasheet with some good info about the memory controller's features beginning on page 57:

http://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/datasheet/323370.pdf


#43
leakyboat
New Member
  • Total Posts : 16
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/04/05 08:19:23
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2010/06/09 15:18:04 (permalink)
And here's every DIMM populated (X5680s) with DDR3-1333 (KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G) using default options in the BIOS:


#44
pawelp
New Member
  • Total Posts : 6
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/04/04 04:25:16
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/05/30 11:42:08 (permalink)
Hi, I know it's been very long time since the last post however I think this subject can't get old :) I have been reading this thread with an intrest however last post actually ruined my understanding...
 
leakyboat populated each slot on SR-2 with 4GB sticks and used default configuration in BIOS and the memory multiplayer didn't seem to drop as stated previously in the thread. With all slots populated it should be running at 1066 as mentioned before at default. Does it mean that leakybot overclocked his CPU like from 133 to 166 to achieve 1333 on all sticks?
 
I have recently ordered SR-2 and I am looking for some nice memory. I need 48gb ideally ECC and I want to overclock my future X5650 at least 25% or more... After reading this thread I thought I need 12 sticks 4 GB each (dual or single ranked whatever is cheapest) 1333Mhz ECC then my mem multi should go down so I will be able to overclock CPU and get my memory back at 1333. And if I want to overclock even more I should get 1600.
 
But from leakyboat's post I can see that populating 12 slots with 1333 didn't drop the mem multi so does it mean that I won't be able to overclock my CPU with this memory?
 
I would be grateful for any clarification as I am a bit lost.
 
Thanks!
 
 

 
post edited by pawelp - 2011/05/30 11:59:19
#45
KONAn
ACX Member
  • Total Posts : 338
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/04/05 11:44:46
  • Location: Gdansk, Poland
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 3
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/05/30 13:59:48 (permalink)
 
pawelp 
 But from leakyboat's post I can see that populating 12 slots with 1333 didn't drop the mem multi so does it mean that I won't be able to overclock my CPU with this memory?  

 
You will be able to overclock...simply change memory multiplier to 1066 or 800 MHz, as a matter of fact if you overclock and use ECC memory (1333MHz speed) you should change memory multiplier manually to 6x or 8x...depending on your BCLK speed.
 
  "leakyboat" post just shows that earlier statements about automatic memory multiplier dropping (when all banks populated) is somehow not a true statement...

EVGA SR-2
Dual Xeon E5620@3.8 GHz (19*200BCLK) Vcore: 1.33V, Vtt: 1.35V, IOH: 1.4V 
48GB (12x4GB) Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/8G @1200MHZ 1.5V@1.6V 7-7-7-20-2T 
Corsair AX1200, EVGA GTX 285, LSi 9260 8i, Obsidian 700D
CPU/GPU/MB watercooled
.
#46
pawelp
New Member
  • Total Posts : 6
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/04/04 04:25:16
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/05/30 14:08:30 (permalink)
Thank you KONAn, I got it.
#47
scsi2man
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 121
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/12/22 20:05:23
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/06/07 22:45:17 (permalink)
I use 12 sticks of 4GB ECC Registered 1333 Kingston memory and my speed is at 1333. I think you are wrong about the memory being downclocked. I also tried 12 sticks of 8GB ECC registered 1333 memory and it also shows it as being at 1333. I think someone in this forum needs to go and read again how the memory slots work when populated.
According to page 58 of Intel's supported memory speed sheet, it says that you can have 2 dimms per channel mixing single rank and dual rank and it will be able to run at 1333. I myself use 2 4 GB sticks per channel for a total of 12 sticks and it runs perfectly fine at 1333 at stock speeds and settings. Please review the information on Intel's website before you claim that having more than 2 sticks per channel will downclock the ram.
post edited by scsi2man - 2011/06/07 22:51:36

Asus Z9PE-D8 WS, 128GB Samsung DDR3 1600 ECC REG, 2 Geforce GTX 780 ti's in SLI, Areca 1882ix-24-4G, 6 Samsung 840 pro 256GB in raid 0, 12 WD RE4 2TB in raid 6, 14 Hitachi Ultrastar 4TB in raid 6, Enermax MAXRevo 1500 watt, Enermax MAXRevo 1350 watt, Dell U3011 30" display, Lian Li D8000 case
#48
aalandan
New Member
  • Total Posts : 1
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/05/21 19:49:05
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/07/19 13:08:36 (permalink)
Ok, so then would populating half the slots with 8gb sticks work using two 5650s?
#49
scsi2man
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 121
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/12/22 20:05:23
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/07/19 15:39:07 (permalink)
Though 8 GB sticks are not officially supported, I do know various members use them and I myself now use them as well. It is possible to use them. The board will handle 96 GB of ram, but it must be ECC Registered as there are no desktop sticks that support 8 GB as of yet.

Asus Z9PE-D8 WS, 128GB Samsung DDR3 1600 ECC REG, 2 Geforce GTX 780 ti's in SLI, Areca 1882ix-24-4G, 6 Samsung 840 pro 256GB in raid 0, 12 WD RE4 2TB in raid 6, 14 Hitachi Ultrastar 4TB in raid 6, Enermax MAXRevo 1500 watt, Enermax MAXRevo 1350 watt, Dell U3011 30" display, Lian Li D8000 case
#50
Forgotton
ACX Member
  • Total Posts : 460
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/04/13 03:14:25
  • Location: California
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 4
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/07/19 22:14:55 (permalink)
The board can actually handle 384 Gig's of ram, 32 GB Dimms, which are now appearing on the market. This is generally not advisable because of the issues listed earlier in the thread. And any amount above 24 gig's ram max will have the effect of surpassing the bandwidth. The only times this should even be considered is if the board is to be used solely for applications like, Server Environment, Engineering drafting, Drafting in general. Music or Video Editing. These types of  goals it can be feasible to go for a larger amount of ram. Because the Ram that will be used by the system on average will far surpass the average user, or gamers needs.

You are entered into EVGA Affiliate Program with Affiliate Code P3JUPP2EXM
My Build Log: http://www.evga.com/forum...302&mpage=1#965008
HeatWare: http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=75849
E-Bay: Forgotton_One_Shadowlord
My Will is the Titans Will no HAMSTER can stop ME!
Pro Is the opposite of Con
So Progress is the opposite of Congress
 

 

 
 
#51
scsi2man
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 121
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/12/22 20:05:23
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/07/20 20:44:13 (permalink)
And you tested these 32 GB sticks and know that they do work? I actually own and use 8 GB sticks, and have tried various 16 GB sticks in the board and the 16 GB sticks in the 1066 (crucial, hynix, kingston, and elpida) as well as the 1333 (samsung) do not work in this board. I'd assume because they don't work in mine that it would most likely be the same for others. Has anyone else tried 16GB or 32 GB sticks? I'd be interested in knowing if they do work.

Asus Z9PE-D8 WS, 128GB Samsung DDR3 1600 ECC REG, 2 Geforce GTX 780 ti's in SLI, Areca 1882ix-24-4G, 6 Samsung 840 pro 256GB in raid 0, 12 WD RE4 2TB in raid 6, 14 Hitachi Ultrastar 4TB in raid 6, Enermax MAXRevo 1500 watt, Enermax MAXRevo 1350 watt, Dell U3011 30" display, Lian Li D8000 case
#52
flascubaboy
New Member
  • Total Posts : 46
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/09/21 04:18:03
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/08/07 16:52:03 (permalink)
i must say i should rise my hand ty you that took care of a few ram ? i had no need to post you just answered all 3 of them..
#53
SandersAce
ACX Member
  • Total Posts : 376
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/02/17 15:41:17
  • Location: Holland
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 5
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/08/07 17:15:11 (permalink)
My mind is dazzled by all the technical terms here and there in this thread but very usefull all together.
Great explanation!
 
with my own system OC'ed to 205 Bclk I feel save to add another 6 dimms of Corsair Domi GT's now, and not losing any bandwith.


#54
scsi2man
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 121
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/12/22 20:05:23
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/08/10 15:26:02 (permalink)
I would like to note that BigBrother's claim about the 2 memory sticks is true for the 5500 series xeons as indicated on pages 125-130 for the 5500 series volume 2 data sheet which states that for population of 2 sticks per channel will downclock ram to 1066, but 1 channel can run at 1333. This is NOT true for the 5600 series which he has indicated in this entire post.
 
It is indicated on pages 57-60 of volume 2 of the data sheet for the 5600 series xeons that having 2 sticks of registered dimms per channel or 2 unbuffered (ECC or non-ECC) will run at 1333. This claim and proof is against what BigBrother has stated. I suggest for future purposes that these articles be reviewed for accuracy, as the original poster was totally incorrect about all of this.

Asus Z9PE-D8 WS, 128GB Samsung DDR3 1600 ECC REG, 2 Geforce GTX 780 ti's in SLI, Areca 1882ix-24-4G, 6 Samsung 840 pro 256GB in raid 0, 12 WD RE4 2TB in raid 6, 14 Hitachi Ultrastar 4TB in raid 6, Enermax MAXRevo 1500 watt, Enermax MAXRevo 1350 watt, Dell U3011 30" display, Lian Li D8000 case
#55
LKrieger
New Member
  • Total Posts : 73
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/11/22 09:52:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 2
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/08/21 23:48:27 (permalink)
Cool :).
 
I got an X5650 and 48GB Ram by 12 dimms. So i should reach only 1333mhz on ram and a nonclocked CPU - right?
 

 
 
I think i can reach many more! Until yet my System is absolutley stable!
 
LKrieger
post edited by LKrieger - 2011/08/21 23:55:45

The big system: www.sysprofile.de/id31233
#56
goombha
New Member
  • Total Posts : 1
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/12/10 14:23:04
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/08/22 01:53:45 (permalink)
 Hello there, I am dearly sorry for bothering you with this but for this overclocking technique to work when filling all twelve slots, will two of this particular ram set work? Additionally I have been unable to find out if it is double or single rank. 

CORSAIR Vengeance 24GB (6 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 Desktop Memory Model CMZ24GX3M6A1600C9

 One last thing that is of minor importance and I apologise if this is not the right place to be asking this (my first post). For the SR2 build I am making, the case I intend to use: the mountain mods u2-ufo will have space for 12 120mm fans, two of which I intend to fill with the Corsair H80 liquid closed circuit water cooler but from what I understand the SR2 has only eight fan headers. Since I have never worked with a motherboard of this magnitude before I am unaware as to if two of the eight fan headers are dedicated to the CPU fans themselves,  are there three or four pins per header, and if using two to four cable splitters (depending whether I have eight or six fan headers to work with) to plug two fans per header will put too much stress on the mother board?
 
To sum it all up, will using cable splitters to get ten 120mm fans plus two Corsair H80 CPU coolers to work with eight fan headers put too much stress on the motherboard and are two of those headers reserved for the CPU fans/coolers or do the fans have their own connectors (The two H80s in my case) leaving me with eight headers for ten fans ? And are the fan headers three or four pins.
 
 Sorry for the convoluted and ignorant question, if necessary ask me to reiterate my question(s) if they/it do not make sense.
 
 Thankyou.
#57
KONAn
ACX Member
  • Total Posts : 338
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/04/05 11:44:46
  • Location: Gdansk, Poland
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 3
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/08/22 03:47:36 (permalink)
My specs (bellow in signature) and I can reach 1600MHz with 10-10-10-27 latencies.

EVGA SR-2
Dual Xeon E5620@3.8 GHz (19*200BCLK) Vcore: 1.33V, Vtt: 1.35V, IOH: 1.4V 
48GB (12x4GB) Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/8G @1200MHZ 1.5V@1.6V 7-7-7-20-2T 
Corsair AX1200, EVGA GTX 285, LSi 9260 8i, Obsidian 700D
CPU/GPU/MB watercooled
.
#58
Dariusz1989
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 173
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/08/08 04:08:43
  • Location: UK
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/08/22 06:04:14 (permalink)
Heya
 
Sory for ''steal'' the topic - just got lil question will 6x4gb/ 2x 3 triple channel ECC REG Kingston quad Rank(rank matters?) work with 2xe5530?
 
 
Also I will populate 6 slots of ram, leaving 6 slots empty. If I buy 2x 3 stick 6x 8gb memory and add it to my existing 24 gb (topping up 72 gb) will this work or they all have to be 8 gb ? 
 
both rams are exactly that same - only capacity changes.
Thanks/
post edited by Dariusz1989 - 2011/08/22 06:08:53

www.dariuszmakowski.com
EVGA SR 2 
2x Xeon 5670 @ 4.0
48 gb 8x4 Tripple channel 1600  
1x Ocz  Vertex 3 120 gb SSD OS
4x WD RE 3 500 gb 2x2 Raid 0
EVGA GTX 680 4GB Classified  
Enermax Revolution 1050w 
Xigmatec Elysium 3x 120 on top / 2x 120 on bottom / 140 back / 2x 120 front / 1x 240 side / 4x CPU 120mm - 2x noctua 50cf + 2x scythe 100 cf
 
#59
strob
New Member
  • Total Posts : 42
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/08/19 11:26:00
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re:WARNING: Populating every DIMM slot on SR-2 downclocks RAM! 2011/11/02 21:18:35 (permalink)
I bought 12 single rank memory stick based on this thread. But as other have suggested, it doesn't seem to be true.
 
I populated all 12 slots of my SR-2 with 2Gb single rank sticks and my memory DRAM frequency in CPU-z is indicated as 665.9Mhz which mean 1331.8 (x2) so close to 1333...
 
What does it mean?
post edited by strob - 2011/11/03 12:18:08

Jocelyn Strob Simard
www.strob.net
#60
Page: < 123 > Showing page 2 of 3
Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile