By all means, please replace me as the rep. I can not devote the time it needs to do a proper job.

As of now and in the past, you basically give input on projects and your feelings on whether they are a good fit for the DC-Vault. Then we expect a little bit of testing so that you have some facts to go off of. Rusty has asked that admins keep personal opinions to the Vault admins sections and keep to the facts in the open forums. Since most of the solid projects are already in the Vault, it is mainly re-visiting projects from time to time to see if any have fallen short of expectations and looking into new projects that show promise. You also kinda represent your team, so if someone thinks something is a bit biased, it will show that there is participation from other teams. You wouldn't be a moderator, so no filtering of the forums or sheriffing of sorts. We all have equal say in matters involving the Vault. However, all finality is typically handled by Rusty whom is one of the owners. He is about the only owner really still active with it. I have been in discussion with him to see about some major changes, but this is still very early stages. Admins are also expected to do what is best for the Vault and not just what is good for their team.