EVGA

Star Wars: Battlefront - AMD VS Nvidia Performance Review

Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
MSim
Omnipotent Enthusiast
  • Total Posts : 14685
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2005/05/22 23:13:30
  • Location: Earth
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 38
2015/11/19 23:31:06 (permalink)
http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/star_wars_battlefront_-_amd_vs_nvidia_performance_review/1
 
GPU Performance testing (aka Hardware/Software News) 
#1

4 Replies Related Threads
    seth89
    CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
    • Total Posts : 5290
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2007/11/13 11:26:18
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 14
    Re: Star Wars: Battlefront - AMD VS Nvidia Performance Review 2015/11/20 10:00:26 (permalink)
    woot go team red


    #2
    stalinx20
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 4977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/01/03 08:56:23
    • Location: U.S., Michigan
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Star Wars: Battlefront - AMD VS Nvidia Performance Review 2015/11/27 18:48:01 (permalink)
    seth89
    woot go team red


    I noticed you have AMD graphics but with an i7 processor. How would it turn out if you had an AMD processor? I'm asking because i'm considering building a full AMD PC using full MSI parts.



    EVGA X79 Dark
    2080 Black edition
    980
    EVGA 1000 gold PSU (Gold)
    4820K CPU
    16x G-skill
    #3
    seth89
    CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
    • Total Posts : 5290
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2007/11/13 11:26:18
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 14
    Re: Star Wars: Battlefront - AMD VS Nvidia Performance Review 2015/11/27 21:18:07 (permalink)
    stalinx20
    seth89
    woot go team red


    I noticed you have AMD graphics but with an i7 processor. How would it turn out if you had an AMD processor? I'm asking because i'm considering building a full AMD PC using full MSI parts.




    Well I just happen to know the answer to that because I just built an all AMD system for a friend
    I did a MSI 970 Gmaing
    AMD FX-6300 CPU
    8GB DDR3 18##something Gskill ram
    MSI R9390 8GB
    Rosewill 850w PSU
    Samsung 850evo SSD 500gb
    Corsair h55 CPU water cooler
    and a corsair spec-03 case
    Windows 10 64bit

    Click to Enlarge 
     
    So this system played BF4 at ultra settings (1080p) at an average of 75FPs and it would go as high as 120FPS.
    GPU would get to around 64*C under a heavy load, but the fans are dead silent.
     
    CPU was boss, you cant beat that type of power for 90 bucks.
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113286
    had no reason to OC it. The AMD CPUs have more than enough power to play any game without bottle necks. I left this CPU at stock setting
     
    here's the link to the Motherboard I used
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130790

    And here is the link to the GPU 
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127875
     


    #4
    RainStryke
    The Advocate
    • Total Posts : 15872
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2007/07/19 19:26:55
    • Location: Kansas
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 60
    Re: Star Wars: Battlefront - AMD VS Nvidia Performance Review 2015/11/28 02:43:12 (permalink)
    Looks like the Fury X is the better choice for the higher resolutions. But the Nvidia is better for people that are still playing on high refresh rate monitors at lower resolutions.

    Main PC | Secondary PC
    Intel i9 10900K | Intel i7 9700K
    MSI MEG Z490 ACE | Gigabyte Aorus Z390 Master
    ASUS TUF RTX 3090 | NVIDIA RTX 2070 Super
    32GB G.Skill Trident Z Royal 4000MHz CL18 | 32GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB 4266MHz CL17
    SuperFlower Platinum SE 1200w | Seasonic X-1250
    Samsung EVO 970 1TB and Crucial P5 1TB | Intel 760p 1TB and Crucial MX100 512GB
    Cougar Vortex CF-V12HPB x9 | Cougar Vortex CF-V12SPB-RGB x5
     
    3DMark Results:Time Spy|Port Royal

    #5
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile