Shader clock as far as I can tell is 2:1 (so 2168 Shader:1084 Core, 648 Shader :324 Core, 1247:2494) with core clock, so that renders that irrelevant, seems to me the only necessary information for people to add is what their max boost is at base because the gpu will change it around as for mine that means 1006 + 91 = 1097 max boost from base + 150 = 1247 MHZ max boost with overclock. So either way I think the format should be 1. Name | CPU  ---------- # Cards -------Max Boost from Base --------- Power Target/Base Offset/Memory Offset -----------Score ------- Cooling Method so in favor of that 

BeaconPCGuru | I72600k4.0Ghz --- 1 -- 91 Max Base Boost-- 132/+150/+700 -- 10,753 -- Stock Air
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3071439  

no intended to enter rank i dont get those rules but my CPU is my 24/7 this is what i get cards are improving slowly each day now both do perfect +200 core +540 mem air i luv them :)
 

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

@andressergio - you've got everything needed to enter the leaderboard.....just send me the score link and lets get you on!
 
@the-real-link - Get that screenshot then be sure to post your results in the correct format (see OP).
 
Thanks guys and have fun overclocking :P

andressergio

no intended to enter rank i dont get those rules but my CPU is my 24/7 this is what i get cards are improving slowly each day now both do perfect +200 core +540 mem air i luv them :)


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Now I am getting a little concerned with my 680's.  In SLI, I cannot go past +100 on the offset even with 132% power.  Anything above 100+ and they crash...seeing the above user being at 200+ in his sli, which is DOUBLE than what I can is shocking.  I know not every card is equal, but that is a big disparity.  My temps never go above 63c as well.   It seems based on what I have seen on this board that I have THE LOWEST offset of any SLI setup..which when you pay as much as these cards are that is unsettling.
 
Should I be concerned that there may be something wrong with one of my cards?
 

Forgive me if this was already answered in the 4 pages, but just browsing through, i have found people running 170+ offset on the GPU on air, i am wondering how the hell they can do that? as i can only get around 155 - 160 stable (granted auto fan, and 80c) but still, does 100% fan make that much of a difference? Am i doing something wrong
EDIT, just set fan to max (85c) and got to no more then 63c and still crashes, perhaps i have an unlucky one lol

Just curious has anyone Popped one in a 8X slot and got a score at all stock, then popped it in a 16X slot, compared;  then walked their OC up from stock to 4.0 comparing benches along the way, Just curious if the 680 meets similar findings with the 580 as far as bandwidth , OC utilization and processor overhead. I know what results I am expecting, but do not have one to test myself.

Hello all.  I'd like to post my results, but can't figure out how to insert my screen shot.  I know I can't post a link yet, but will do as describe in the rules section.  Any help is appreciated
 
Thanks...Al

Methodical2

Hello all. I'd like to post my results, but can't figure out how to insert my screen shot. I know I can't post a link yet, but will do as describe in the rules section. Any help is appreciated

Thanks...Al

 
I like using the snipit tool, save to Photobucket, and use The IMG code to post the pic.

e4601 ---- i5 2500k @ 5.096 ---- (1) 680 ---- 1326/3664/2653 ---- 132%/+190/+660 ---- 10669 ---- Air
 
xxxx://3dmark.com/3dm11/3104571;jsessionid=1579srq1fqi1k1zv2v0ytoi3
 

spewing!, i figured out my issues i was having, its all temp based!, but i didnt view my results on the web, so i dont think it uploaded?, I may need to re run it, but anyway here is a picture, 3930k at 4.4ghz, and gtx 680 at 132% power, and +170 and +400 memory, managed P11091
 

digibrat ---- i7 3930k @ 4.600 ---- (1) 680 ---- 1111/3579/2328 ---- 132%/+105/+575 ---- 10395 ---- Air
Link
 
Cant seem to get the GPU clocks any higher without a driver crash :(

@digibrat - need 3DMark11 link as well as a screenshot of EVGA NV-Z for clock speeds

OK everyone here's my entry.  I had to upload to my site and host it from there.  I hope in the future I can just attached files without having to upload to my site.  Thanks for the help fellas.
 
Hey fellas I tried to enter the link using the dots as suggested, but I am having no luck getting it to stick.  Ironically, the links works when I preview the post, but not after I post the post.  Any other tricks to get the link up?
  
Thanks...Al
 
Edit: I just go my 10th post in so I can post links now.  Well no go yet.  I will keep at. 
Edit: finally able to post the 3DMk11 link
Name -------- CPU @ X.XX --- (X) 680 --- GPU/MEM/SH(clocks) --- PWR/GPU/MEM (offset) --- PXXXX --- Air 
Methodical2    i7 2600k @4.6  (2) 680      1292/3404/2477              +130%/+155/+400         P16157    Air 
 
 

 

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3098401 

...

I'm curious how much CPU makes a difference on 3Dmark scores? I've seen people with i7 2600k @ 4.4 with a 680 getting less than 10k (performance). But then I'll see others getting around 11k.
 
I'm assuming with my i5 2500k running at stock with one 680, I'm probably not going to get a very high score... unfortunately, this being my HTPC, I can't put a CPU cooler taller than 70mm... so I'm too limited on my cooler options and like to run my electronics cool (especially since it's an HTPC and noise matters).
 
On a side note: Once the silverstone GD08 case comes out, I'll grab that and have 138mm clearance (still not enough for a hyper 212+ or a d14), which will allow for this cooler: http://www.noctua.at/main...ducts_id=35&lng=en