gotendbz1

cabbage

i just benched my single 580 3gb for a comparison to the scores above. i have an i7 960 oc to 4ghz. my score was 6626. the difference is pretty substantial.

are you oc'ing the 580 at all? that score seems low. 

 
doesn't look low to me, I use to have 2 x GTX 460's in SLI that got around 6200, and I knew they were about the same as a single GTX 580

jamiesonrob

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3040542

why is it saying my score is low compared to others and i am also trying to figure out why my physics score is lower compared to others.

Your score is about right, I wouldn't pay attention to them

gotendbz1

cabbage

i just benched my single 580 3gb for a comparison to the scores above. i have an i7 960 oc to 4ghz. my score was 6626. the difference is pretty substantial.

are you oc'ing the 580 at all? that score seems low. 

i have a mild oc of 800/1600/2100

Ok guys since the GTX680 is a dynamically adjusting card, I have come up with a general layout I think will work. Let me know what you guys think...

Name ------ CPU @ X.XX ------ (1) GTX680 ------ Base ------ Power % / GPU Offset / Mem Offset ------ PXXXXX ----- Air/H2o
 
So with this template it would translate into something like this (example):

TechSoldier ----- i7 2600k @ 4.80 ------ (1) GTX680 ----- 1006 ---- 115% / +100 / +500 ----- P10000 ---- Air

techsoldier

Ok guys since the GTX680 is a dynamically adjusting card, I have come up with a general layout I think will work. Let me know what you guys think...

Name ------ CPU @ X.XX ------ (1) GTX680 ------ Base ------ Power % / GPU Offset / Mem Offset ------ PXXXXX ----- Air/H2o

So with this template it would translate into something like this (example):

TechSoldier ----- i7 2600k @ 4.80 ------ (1) GTX680 ----- 1006 ---- 115% / +100 / +500 ----- P10000 ---- Air

Looks good, updated my post.

Lmah84 ----- i7 930 @ 4.4 ------ (1) GTX680 ----- 1006 ---- 132% / +185 / +425 ----- P10018 ---- Air
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3046305

staypuft

lmah84

Lmah84 ----- i7 930 @ 4.4 ------ (1) GTX680 ----- 1006 ---- 132% / +185 / +425 ----- P10018 ---- Air
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3046305

What is your actual boost clock at that +185 setting?

 
It says 1060 no matter what offset I use... maybe I'm looking in the wrong location or something.  I'm just looking at the orange arrow in precisionx
 
I'm still not totally understanding the 680.  I see most people getting their memory offset to +500 and I cannot raise it above 425 otherwise I get freezing.

1. E4601 ------2500k @ 5.048 ----------- (1) 680 ---------- 1006 ---------- 132% / +155 / +510 ------------ P10286 -------- Air




P45364 3DMarks.  Same settings.

techsoldier

Ok guys since the GTX680 is a dynamically adjusting card, I have come up with a general layout I think will work. Let me know what you guys think...

Name ------ CPU @ X.XX ------ (1) GTX680 ------ Base ------ Power % / GPU Offset / Mem Offset ------ PXXXXX ----- Air/H2o

So with this template it would translate into something like this (example):

TechSoldier ----- i7 2600k @ 4.80 ------ (1) GTX680 ----- 1006 ---- 115% / +100 / +500 ----- P10000 ---- Air

 
Nice thread to compare our scores. But what I don't really grasp is the inter comparability. I mean as long as the CPU's and GPU's aren't running at equal clocks, how can You compare them reliable? It would make more sense in my view to have 2 scores: one for default clocks and one for occing. Or did I misread something?
 
 
 

^^^ Most of that information we are already capturing based on this layout:
 
Name ------ CPU @ X.XX ------ (1) GTX680 ------ Base ------ Power % / GPU Offset / Mem Offset ------ PXXXXX ----- Air/H2o
 
I do agree that the base clock is really not relevant so I'm thinking I'll record the GPU Mem Clock Speed as it shows up on 3DMark11. The problem with recording the core clock speed is that there is no way to verify as this info does not change in the benchmark. From all the links posted I see 705 as the core so unless people know their core or post a screenshot there's no way to know.
 
@all - To make this competition fair and accurate for everyone, how about we have a screen shot requirement with 3DMark11 score and Precision X open to verify all scores and relevant information. I know its more work but I think its the only way to truly verify oc settings.

Thanks killer_hz, this should help me determine a final format we can all use.Once determined I'll update the leaderboard and start adding scores.
 
If you posted a score and I don't have enough info, I'll PM you.

Really curious to know how you're pulling higher scores with less OC than I am. You have my highest score beat by +400 with less oomph.

Killer... sick numbers!!!  *drool*

Yeah I was running at +220 and +550 for my 3DMark to hit the 10576 with a 5.1GHz on processor.. nice though :)

Not bad for a castrated, un-clockable, total-rip-off-of-a-card   : P
 
Cant wait to get mine!  Grrrrr... Tiger Direct...  Y u tell me u have 680 then say backorder?!