New score.. did some overclocking..:D


Hething----------I7-930 @ 4.022------(3) 470SC 775/1550/1801----40238----65146---P44532---All Air 

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=2504433

dictator93

My comp is very close to yours in terms of overclock (4.0 Ghz i7 vs your 4.2, and 825 core vs your 835 core), yet you get a much nicer Graphics score (my 33433 to your 35141). DO you think your larger overclock on the CPU lends to this? If so... do you think you could post some of your voltage and BIOS settings to help a fellow EVGA fan? :D

 
Sorry for the late reply, I've been away for  awhile.
Yes the slight oc advantage on both is helping my scores if you look above your last post(470) the scores are closer so are our settings.  I'm not sure if ram timings effect scores in vantage, but they couldn't hurt could they. I am still tightening my timings as we speak got them down to 5-7-6 now.   As far as voltages go there are already tons of templates out there but we have different chips, mobos, and bios so i cant really recommend any voltages or settings. Sorry to say you just have to play with it and work them both up slowly, or just shoot for what you want at a high vcore and work your way down on the voltage till its no longer stable.  My chip runs 4.2@s1.29-1.31 range haven't tested passed 14 hours of prime but have never bsod or crashed in real world use.  Been running this rig for about 9 months and still tweaking more out of it lol It also could be the drivers, I think I'm still running the Xtreme-g 258.96 version. Lastly I have ran vantage at the same setting and got different scores not huge difference but enough to notice.
  Sorry I couldnt be more help sir, but just keep tweaking and have fun!!!  THAT'S AN ORDER !!!!!! LOL

pgmoney

pgmoney

pgmoney --------------- i7 930 @ 4.2 -------- (3) 470 790/1580/1777 ------- 41776 ---- 64898 ---- P45861 ---- Water

 
needs updated got a higher score still working on morelooks likei got plenty more OC room to go
 
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=2419263

NEW UPDATE SCORE 46,909
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=2440355
 
pgmoney --------------- i7 930 @ 3.875 -------- (3) 470 875/1730/1775 ------- 42779 ---- 66033 ---- P46909 ---- Water
 
 
I am working to catch you AJR  ;)

you still have not updated my new score in the OP

he posted on friday that he was going to update it in the morning,
 in any case i have a new scores

Adondrand----------- I7 875K @ 4.4 -- (2) 470 SC 799/1602/1850--- 33106----  60585 ---- P37340 ---- Air

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=2512630

Just installed the new 260.63 Beta Drivers and did a little bit of OC'ing on stock voltage, here's my new score:

B7Cao ----------------- C2Q Q9550@3.8GHz -- (1) 470 670/1340/1674 -----  16502 ---- 51844 ---- P19892 ---- Stock

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=2516226

wizdumb1----i7 930 @ 3.99----(1) 470SC----800/1600/1745----19305---64822----P23415---Air
Driver 260.63

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=2517907

doorules

doorules...i7 980X @ 4.8   (3) 470 SC's  860/1720/1900        47607///81974    P53181   H2O    gpu voltage is 1.137   260.63 driver

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=2516407

Can't wait for cooler weather. Right now temps are getting me. I can make it almost to the end of the New Calico test at 870 and it craps out. Both CPU tests pass fine.

v8n3t

HeavyHemi,

What are your temps like while running 3DMark Vantage at those speeds? Just wondering what temp is killing you, it may just need a bump in voltage.

Hitting about 90C...I've tried higher voltages with the BIOS mod and it's even more unstable past 1.125. Shaders are more sensitive to temp. I've no doubt if I was on water it would pass fine.

yup, real nice bump with those new drivers KemTech, well you are running higher volts then i have, highest i have ventured yet is 1.137 with a passed run at 870/1740/1925, but you got that skunked, although a single card does allow for extreme oc's...

Ill be getting my 2nd card soon, hopefully next week, will see then if my cards can handle those clocks, although it wouldnt really matter as the Sli would mean i can downclock some and get my temps <60 :-)
For gaming i use 850/1700/2000 at 1.150 max temp then is 54.
I might see if i can run that clock at a lower voltage.

But seriously cant wait for my 2nd card and WC loop upgrade

Thanks doorules,

Just had a another bench as i didnt save the last one i thought id push alittle more.

KemTech----------- i5-750 @ 4.0 -- (1) 470 SC 900/1800/2112--- 21898----  64490 ---- P26229 ---- Water.

Yesterdays test was with my previous score 895, that setup also produced over 26K. All in all im happy with the drivers.

Also i dont know how to post pictures without making it an attachment lol

KemTech
KemTech----------- i5-750 @ 4.0 -- (1) 470 SC 900/1800/2112--- 21898----  64490 ---- P26229 ---- Water.

Yesterdays test was with my previous score 895, that setup also produced over 26K. All in all im happy with the drivers.

Just wanted to conclude that when I ran my cards at 890/1860 I got a better score than 900/1860. Think that might be the threshold of the card.

New personal best, this new 260.63 beta driver rocks!!!

NemesisChild ------ Phenom II 965@ 4.08GHz--- (1) 470  815/1630/1850 ----- 19352 ---- 51686 ---- P22940 ---- Stock

http://service.futuremark...AD90BB8CB25F818241BDE3

I wonder how far the memory can be pushed?

I have seen other people getting it to 2000mghz, how I have no idea.

I will try and push the memory tomorrow until I get lockups to see where it stops. I have my cards flashed to allow 1.162v so juice shouldn't be a problem. 

My cards under 100% load at those clocks never exceed 44'C either. 

Let me know what you card can do memory wise. 

Try your run's with the core at 890 instead of 895, so we can have linear results. 

When you flashed your cards you let them go up to 1.2v?

I was reading up on these cards a lot and anything over 1.180 is supposed to be detrimental to the memory.

I would be careful with that high voltage, regardless of having one or multiple cards.