rcranfield
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 6799
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2007/04/21 06:21:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 25
Re:No more Linux Bigadv
2010/07/08 11:27:18
(permalink)
I changed the flag last night and let the -advmethods unit work through. At the time I went to bed it was netting 10,000 PPD and the WU was 88% done. This morning I saw that the net PPD in HFM is 6600. TPF is about 10 min. I don't recall which WU I was working on. I am not sure if this in another -advmethods, or a -bigadv. Either way I don't like lower PPD.
|
Barbarossa
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5316
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/01/28 11:43:24
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 25
Re:No more Linux Bigadv
2010/07/08 11:34:02
(permalink)
that´s prolly a project 6701/2/3 (no bigadv, but still takes along time) With a bigadv(project 2684) its either 3k ppd (if you just miss the deadline)or 14k+( 14k if you just make the deadline) ppd edit: is that on your 940? If its at stock forget bigadv. I´ve run it on a stock 950 (dedicated, no gpu folding) and had a tpf of 55 min. Including upload I made it with 29min to spare for the bonus 
post edited by Barbarossa - 2010/07/08 11:39:47
|
rambler358
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 2633
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/05/01 21:41:19
- Location: Torrance, CA
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 5
Re:No more Linux Bigadv
2010/07/08 11:58:40
(permalink)
Barbarossa With a bigadv(project 2684) its either 3k ppd (if you just miss the deadline)or 14k+( 14k if you just make the deadline) ppd How much actual time to go is "just making" the deadline? I usually complete the SMP bigadv projects with about 9-12 hours to spare, depending on how much gaming (no folding) I do during that time.
|
Barbarossa
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5316
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/01/28 11:43:24
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 25
Re:No more Linux Bigadv
2010/07/08 12:04:08
(permalink)
Well, I saw the "results successfully sent" 29 min before what HFM showed as deadline, if that´s what you mean with how much time to go
|
rambler358
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 2633
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/05/01 21:41:19
- Location: Torrance, CA
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 5
Re:No more Linux Bigadv
2010/07/08 12:08:56
(permalink)
I actually meant to ask, how much time before the deadline is just making it? Or, how long prior to the deadline can you still get the big bonus points?
|
Barbarossa
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5316
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/01/28 11:43:24
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 25
Re:No more Linux Bigadv
2010/07/08 12:13:56
(permalink)
As long as Stanford receives it before the preferred deadline you get the bonus.
In my case with 29 min to spare it averaged out to 14k ppd l, so I got about 60k for that wu. It´s slightly less than what I´m getting on the "good" (excl. the 6040/1/2 and 670x wus) regular A3s
|
rcranfield
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 6799
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2007/04/21 06:21:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 25
Re:No more Linux Bigadv
2010/07/08 12:22:40
(permalink)
Barbarossa
that´s prolly a project 6701/2/3 (no bigadv, but still takes along time)
With a bigadv(project 2684) its either 3k ppd (if you just miss the deadline)or 14k+( 14k if you just make the deadline) ppd
edit: is that on your 940? If its at stock forget bigadv. I´ve run it on a stock 950 (dedicated, no gpu folding) and had a tpf of 55 min. Including upload I made it with 29min to spare for the bonus
I just got on logmein and checked. It is a 6701. And yes it is on my 940 at stock. I can bump i a bit, but really had little success when I was trying to do any OC on it when it was new. I never reached a stable 4 on air, but can probably get a good stable 3.6.
|
Barbarossa
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5316
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/01/28 11:43:24
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 25
Re:No more Linux Bigadv
2010/07/08 12:30:04
(permalink)
3.6 should be OK, leaves you with more time to spare than my 950 at 3.1
Now what I can´t tell you is how much impact gpu folding has. Seeing that I´ll barely make the deadline I never switched on the gpu
|
rambler358
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 2633
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/05/01 21:41:19
- Location: Torrance, CA
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 5
Re:No more Linux Bigadv
2010/07/08 12:36:19
(permalink)
Barbarossa Now what I can´t tell you is how much impact gpu folding has. Seeing that I´ll barely make the deadline I never switched on the gpu I really don't think GPU folding takes that big of a hit on the SMP bigadv folding. When I posted earlier above, I should've also mentioned that I have 4 GPU clients running at the same time on a pair of GTX295s (using current WHQL drivers).
|
rcranfield
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 6799
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2007/04/21 06:21:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 25
Re:No more Linux Bigadv
2010/07/08 14:21:13
(permalink)
I'll give it a go and we will see. My biggest PPD comes from my GPUs so I don't want to do anything that will impact that. If I am going from 10000 PPD on the advmethods to 14000 ppd on the bigadv, but losing my 17000 ppd on the GPUs on that machine, it is not a good exchange.
|
