Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49168
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 199
|
TheSadClown
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 145
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/03/11 04:09:05
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 12:59:44
(permalink)
|
seta8967
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1813
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/03/03 05:18:45
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 13:02:59
(permalink)
This is hardly scientific. 2 seperate people and both setups different and overclocked. We dont know if the 1080 setup is throttling or has another issue. Yes the 1080 should be faster but too many variables.
|
hallowen
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5644
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/06/18 15:38:00
- Location: In a Galaxy Far, Far Away...
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 14
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 13:04:12
(permalink)
Doesn't make the GTX 1080 running at over 2114MHz look as good (in the Graphics tests) as the GTX 980ti running at 1485MHz.
ASUS: Rampage VI Extreme | i9-7940X | 2X RTX 2080 Ti Kingpin SLI | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz Memory - SAGER: NP9870-G | i7-6700K | GTX 980M 8GB | 64GB DDR4 | 950 PRO M.2 512GB | 17.3 QHD 120Hz Matte G-Sync | Prema bios - EVOC Premamod: P870TM1 | i9-9900K-LM | RTX 2080N 8GB | Modded Vapor Chamber | 32GB 3000MHz Ripjaws | 960 EVO M.2 1TB | 17.3 3K QHD 120Hz Matte G-Sync | Intel 8265 -
|
sy5tem
New Member
- Total Posts : 20
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/10/19 16:16:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 13:04:24
(permalink)
hope that is something wrong with that 1080 bench ,,, wow
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49168
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 199
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 13:09:22
(permalink)
seta8967 This is hardly scientific. 2 seperate people and both setups different and overclocked. We dont know if the 1080 setup is throttling or has another issue. Yes the 1080 should be faster but too many variables.
hallowen Doesn't make the GTX 1080 running at over 2114MHz look as good (in the Graphics tests) as the GTX 980ti running at 1485MHz.
|
Viper453
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 630
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/03/13 17:52:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 13:13:03
(permalink)
MIS 4090 Trio i9 10900K EVGA 1600 P+ G.SKILL TridentZ Series 3200 mhz cas 14 32gb OS drive 960 pro 2 tb 2x EVO 860 4TB Monitor ROG PQ32UQX / LG C2 "65
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49168
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 199
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 13:20:03
(permalink)
|
hallowen
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5644
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/06/18 15:38:00
- Location: In a Galaxy Far, Far Away...
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 14
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 13:30:31
(permalink)
ASUS: Rampage VI Extreme | i9-7940X | 2X RTX 2080 Ti Kingpin SLI | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz Memory - SAGER: NP9870-G | i7-6700K | GTX 980M 8GB | 64GB DDR4 | 950 PRO M.2 512GB | 17.3 QHD 120Hz Matte G-Sync | Prema bios - EVOC Premamod: P870TM1 | i9-9900K-LM | RTX 2080N 8GB | Modded Vapor Chamber | 32GB 3000MHz Ripjaws | 960 EVO M.2 1TB | 17.3 3K QHD 120Hz Matte G-Sync | Intel 8265 -
|
badboy64
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 921
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/06/05 15:11:40
- Location: Fall River USA
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 17:34:12
(permalink)
14th Intel® Core™ i9 14900KF CPU 3.2GHz@6.0ghz, Memory 2x24GB GSkill Trident Z Trident Z5 7200 mhz DDR5 Ram,4,000 GB MSI M480 PRO 4TB , Motherboard eVga 690 Dark , Operating System Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit, Msi Suprim X24G 4090, Monitor Acer CG437K, Logitech G910, Razer Lancehead Tournament Edition, Thermaltake View 91 RGB plus, eVga 1600w P2 PSU, Custom watercooling. Speed Way Score 11,055 points. https://www.3dmark.com/sw/1112818
|
The.Imperial
New Member
- Total Posts : 42
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2014/02/21 03:25:56
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 17:43:12
(permalink)
|
hallowen
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5644
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/06/18 15:38:00
- Location: In a Galaxy Far, Far Away...
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 14
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 17:50:08
(permalink)
Those 1080's graphic tests do seem to work better in 2-way SLI Benchmarks compared to 1X. What 2-way bridge are you using?
ASUS: Rampage VI Extreme | i9-7940X | 2X RTX 2080 Ti Kingpin SLI | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz Memory - SAGER: NP9870-G | i7-6700K | GTX 980M 8GB | 64GB DDR4 | 950 PRO M.2 512GB | 17.3 QHD 120Hz Matte G-Sync | Prema bios - EVOC Premamod: P870TM1 | i9-9900K-LM | RTX 2080N 8GB | Modded Vapor Chamber | 32GB 3000MHz Ripjaws | 960 EVO M.2 1TB | 17.3 3K QHD 120Hz Matte G-Sync | Intel 8265 -
|
AMP_US
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 162
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/06/01 06:18:47
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 17:54:42
(permalink)
|
hallowen
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5644
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/06/18 15:38:00
- Location: In a Galaxy Far, Far Away...
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 14
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 18:05:20
(permalink)
ASUS: Rampage VI Extreme | i9-7940X | 2X RTX 2080 Ti Kingpin SLI | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz Memory - SAGER: NP9870-G | i7-6700K | GTX 980M 8GB | 64GB DDR4 | 950 PRO M.2 512GB | 17.3 QHD 120Hz Matte G-Sync | Prema bios - EVOC Premamod: P870TM1 | i9-9900K-LM | RTX 2080N 8GB | Modded Vapor Chamber | 32GB 3000MHz Ripjaws | 960 EVO M.2 1TB | 17.3 3K QHD 120Hz Matte G-Sync | Intel 8265 -
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49168
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 199
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 18:19:53
(permalink)
hallowen What 2-way bridge are you using?
+1
|
badboy64
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 921
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/06/05 15:11:40
- Location: Fall River USA
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 19:12:34
(permalink)
hallowen Those 1080's graphic tests do seem to work better in 2-way SLI Benchmarks compared to 1X. What 2-way bridge are you using?
I am just using 2 single Sli connectors. What I used with my 980Ti setup.
post edited by badboy64 - 2016/05/31 19:24:01
14th Intel® Core™ i9 14900KF CPU 3.2GHz@6.0ghz, Memory 2x24GB GSkill Trident Z Trident Z5 7200 mhz DDR5 Ram,4,000 GB MSI M480 PRO 4TB , Motherboard eVga 690 Dark , Operating System Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit, Msi Suprim X24G 4090, Monitor Acer CG437K, Logitech G910, Razer Lancehead Tournament Edition, Thermaltake View 91 RGB plus, eVga 1600w P2 PSU, Custom watercooling. Speed Way Score 11,055 points. https://www.3dmark.com/sw/1112818
|
unmeaty
New Member
- Total Posts : 100
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/03/26 14:22:20
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 19:40:17
(permalink)
badboy64 I got some eVga 980Ti vs eVga 1080 FE both in Sli in Ultra and Extreme for 3DMark 11. Only overclocked the processor which has been at that speed for nearly 8 months straight. http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8629989 980Ti Ultra 4k 7483 score http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8644034 GTX 1080 Ultra 4k 9105 score http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8629921 980Ti Extreme score 13236 score http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8644078 GTX 1080 Extreme 15976 score
What kind of temperatures were you seeing from the 1080s? Were they being throttled at any point? Were you using a more aggressive custom fan curve? I have two FE on the way, but I'm 99% sure I'll be slapping a pair of 980Ti AiO pumps on them.
|
badboy64
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 921
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/06/05 15:11:40
- Location: Fall River USA
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/05/31 19:58:27
(permalink)
unmeaty
badboy64 I got some eVga 980Ti vs eVga 1080 FE both in Sli in Ultra and Extreme for 3DMark 11. Only overclocked the processor which has been at that speed for nearly 8 months straight. http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8629989 980Ti Ultra 4k 7483 score http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8644034 GTX 1080 Ultra 4k 9105 score http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8629921 980Ti Extreme score 13236 score http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8644078 GTX 1080 Extreme 15976 score
What kind of temperatures were you seeing from the 1080s? Were they being throttled at any point? Were you using a more aggressive custom fan curve? I have two FE on the way, but I'm 99% sure I'll be slapping a pair of 980Ti AiO pumps on them.
Yes I am using a 80% fan speed curve at 70C using the MSI burner. Which I used for my 980Ti setup too. Temps average around 70C with both gpu's at full load and says between 3100rpm and 3300rpm for the fans. Doesn't seem to throttle at all.
14th Intel® Core™ i9 14900KF CPU 3.2GHz@6.0ghz, Memory 2x24GB GSkill Trident Z Trident Z5 7200 mhz DDR5 Ram,4,000 GB MSI M480 PRO 4TB , Motherboard eVga 690 Dark , Operating System Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit, Msi Suprim X24G 4090, Monitor Acer CG437K, Logitech G910, Razer Lancehead Tournament Edition, Thermaltake View 91 RGB plus, eVga 1600w P2 PSU, Custom watercooling. Speed Way Score 11,055 points. https://www.3dmark.com/sw/1112818
|
hallowen
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5644
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/06/18 15:38:00
- Location: In a Galaxy Far, Far Away...
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 14
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/06/01 05:59:29
(permalink)
badboy64
hallowen Those 1080's graphic tests do seem to work better in 2-way SLI Benchmarks compared to 1X. What 2-way bridge are you using?
I am just using 2 single Sli connectors. What I used with my 980Ti setup.
I definitely would like to see what difference the Scores will be using a New 650MHz SLI HB Bridge, IF Nvidia Ever Has Them in Stock!
ASUS: Rampage VI Extreme | i9-7940X | 2X RTX 2080 Ti Kingpin SLI | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz Memory - SAGER: NP9870-G | i7-6700K | GTX 980M 8GB | 64GB DDR4 | 950 PRO M.2 512GB | 17.3 QHD 120Hz Matte G-Sync | Prema bios - EVOC Premamod: P870TM1 | i9-9900K-LM | RTX 2080N 8GB | Modded Vapor Chamber | 32GB 3000MHz Ripjaws | 960 EVO M.2 1TB | 17.3 3K QHD 120Hz Matte G-Sync | Intel 8265 -
|
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
- Total Posts : 24581
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
- Location: East Coast
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 79
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/06/01 06:20:40
(permalink)
|
stalinx20
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 4977
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/01/03 08:56:23
- Location: U.S., Michigan
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Interesting benchmark results.
2016/06/01 19:59:05
(permalink)
Scarlet-Tech
AMP_US It gets worse... LN2 overclocking seems limited to 1.25 and ONLY 2300-2400Mhz (% wise that is not a good increase). So far it seems that Pascal is not a natural overclocker. Maybe big Pascal will change things.
Maxwell was locked as well, and they used the evbot and the Classified Voltage controller to override that. They just need to get the programmers on board for those two and override it again.
Just theoretically speaking, I think Nvidia does that for liability. The amount of ignorant people out there would try and sue, start a lawsuit, or demand their money back because their card caught on fire because they were not following certain protocols. Surely, if Nvidia wanted to, they could easily allow everybody with the freedom to do whatever they wanted to with their cards, and allow them to overclock it freewill, but alas, I think they just don't trust the people, and pardon me for saying it, they shouldn't.
EVGA X79 Dark 2080 Black edition 980 EVGA 1000 gold PSU (Gold) 4820K CPU 16x G-skill
|