|
|
stalinx20
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 4656
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/01/03 08:56:23
- Location: U.S., Indiana
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Intel X299 HEDT Chipset to Power Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X - LGA2066
2016/11/02 03:10:04
(permalink)
Nope. Not ready to upgrade yet. I'll wait another year.
|
Re: Intel X299 HEDT Chipset to Power Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X - LGA2066
2016/11/02 04:07:50
(permalink)
I will upgrade or wait completely new socket. If I miss LGA2066 my i7-5820K will still be enough for games and all graphic cards. But I would like Skylake-X. Somewhere in 2018, 5 months after launch just to check is everything OK. Now priority is graphic card and I wait M.2 to arrive in Hungary to buy Samsung 960 PRO. I will probably finish with EVGA GTX1080 FTW Hybrid.
|
Xavier Zepherious
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 4629
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/07/04 12:53:39
- Location: Medicine Hat ,Alberta, Canada
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 15
Re: Intel X299 HEDT Chipset to Power Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X - LGA2066
2016/11/02 15:46:31
(permalink)
|
Re: Intel X299 HEDT Chipset to Power Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X - LGA2066
2016/11/02 16:31:55
(permalink)
Intel is the Battlefield/CoD of socket releases. Get a new one every year now.
|
Re: Intel X299 HEDT Chipset to Power Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X - LGA2066
2016/11/02 18:28:32
(permalink)
I really want to go down to a z series board but the whole 24 pcie lanes kills me. 2x gpu=16 lanes, m.2 ssd=4+16, m.2 wifi=2 ir 4+20 and thats 22-24 lanes leaving you with extra which isnt enough if you want another m.2 or sata express ssd. With today consumers, especially the ones the z and x series is marketed to, the demand for more and faster storage. Intel nonsense to giving only 20 or 24 pcie lanes. Prosumers thay use z series now need 40 lanes and I feel the professional/extreme users of the x series need 60+. I am no trchnical expert and it might be possible but I feel with technology advancements intel can do this.
post edited by seta8967 - 2016/11/02 19:01:27
|
Re: Intel X299 HEDT Chipset to Power Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X - LGA2066
2016/11/02 19:52:10
(permalink)
I think I have a couple more years to wait.
My Affiliate Code: 8WEQVXMCJL
|
lehpron
Regular Guy
- Total Posts : 15766
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/05/18 15:22:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 186

Re: Intel X299 HEDT Chipset to Power Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X - LGA2066
2016/11/02 20:26:14
(permalink)
I like the idea that Intel is effectively porting i7-7700K into the HEDT platform via the Kaby Lake-X option, siphoning the i7 line up as entirely HEDT territory, as if the i5 unlocked option will vanish (meaning, i5-7600K is the last unlocked i5 in the Z-platform). It would finally mean that Intel can call HEDT the only platform for overclockers.
It should have happened long ago though, when AMD had nothing for a while, it would have made more sense. With Zen nearby, I suppose Intel doesn't think they'll lose too many enthusiasts from the i5 on down to AMD.
|
Viper453
ACX Member
- Total Posts : 344
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/03/13 17:52:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Intel X299 HEDT Chipset to Power Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X - LGA2066
2016/11/02 20:35:33
(permalink)
2x Titan XP 2 ghz i7 6900k 4.4 ghz ASUS X99 Deluxe II G.SKILL TridentZ Series 3200 mhz cas 14 32gb Samsung 960 pro 2 tb nvme pending install 2x 1 tb EVO 850 drives raid 0 27" XB271HU 65LGUB8500 65" 4k sound blaster z with 7.1 1300 watt speakers
|
Re: Intel X299 HEDT Chipset to Power Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X - LGA2066
2016/11/03 19:06:51
(permalink)
Intel keep same socket and same chipset 3 years for High End Platform. I think 10 cores CPU will cost 1500$, but always will be option for around 400$ and 550$. We could keep same memory on beginning and later to replace. Investment should be only processor if we sell X99 motherboard and CPU. Or even better investment will be only motherboard when I sell mobo and CPU I will buy successor of i7-6850K. But motherboard is again investment around 450-500$. Only if Rampage VI Gene show up for 300$ example.
|
Re: Intel X299 HEDT Chipset to Power Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X - LGA2066
2016/11/03 19:16:44
(permalink)
Maybe NVIDIA will go back to 3-Way and 4-Way Graphics Cards in their Next Generation. Then I would think about a new computer.
|
Xavier Zepherious
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 4629
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/07/04 12:53:39
- Location: Medicine Hat ,Alberta, Canada
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 15
Re: Intel X299 HEDT Chipset to Power Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X - LGA2066
2016/11/06 09:44:01
(permalink)
bcavnaugh Maybe NVIDIA will go back to 3-Way and 4-Way Graphics Cards in their Next Generation. Then I would think about a new computer.
there is NO SLi no more or crossfire Developers use mGPU from now on - so you can have as many cards as you want now and intermix them so anything new(Game wise) does not have SLi settings DX12 uses mGPU why do you want to stay on DX11 and an OS with no support - both from software side(OS and no updates) and driver support on Hardware side? nevermind that New hardware may not work in Windows 8.1,7 or older and older hardware not not work on 10(not certified or supported)
post edited by Xavier Zepherious - 2016/11/06 09:47:52
|
Re: Intel X299 HEDT Chipset to Power Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X - LGA2066
2016/11/06 19:39:10
(permalink)
Kaby Lake X uses 112W TDP for a 4C/8T CPU?
Desktop: i7 3820 - ASUS X79 Sabertooth TUF - 4x4GB G.Skill TridentX 2400C9 - EVGA GTX 580 Classified ULTRA Hydro Copper Microsoft Surface Pro 4: i7 6650U - 16GB RAM - 256GB SSD - Sennheiser HD 598 - DualShock 4 Controller
|
lehpron
Regular Guy
- Total Posts : 15766
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/05/18 15:22:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 186

Re: Intel X299 HEDT Chipset to Power Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X - LGA2066
2016/11/08 08:28:19
(permalink)
Halo_003 Kaby Lake X uses 112W TDP for a 4C/8T CPU?  Keep in mind, TDP is after all just a category, not actual per processor; it gives Intel room to introduce faster SKUs over time without having OEM heatsink companies go out and make new ones every single time for constantly varying TDP values. More than likely, either the upper boundary from the traditional 95W TDP mark in Client is made for future higher frequency options, or just to allow for the other circuity like more PCIe lanes and quad-channel. One need only look at Intel's high-frequency Xeons, regardless of core count, they all have high TDP.
|