Damm, ppl are rude sometimes. Okay, as it stands so far the AMD/ATI FuryX is better than a Vanilla 980 stand-alone. But it's not better than a 980Ti, at least with the latest beta drivers. If I were you I would go to the General Industry Forums about a Lot of Info on both GPU's
 
It really depends on how much money you want to spend, and what GPU maker you like more to. But it looks to me like ur an Nvidia fan. Me Neither side, but i like Nvidia more, I would just like some better bloody Competition.
 
Also, from Tomshardware.com they person said that the FuryX is better for 4K, then for 1440p Monitors,etc. As the 980ti's are.
 
EDIT: Okay, some places do have both the 980Ti and the FuryX neck and neck. I DO think the General Discussion Forums and the General Industry Forums can help with ur Decision. Like I was saying and another poster here said, the FuryX is best for 4K users probably.

VGAMASTER198
I need help making a decision, I need to choose a good GPU that can handle most game on high settings at 1080P. The two main contenders are the GTX 980 or the yet to come out air cooled R9 Fury X. I need help because this rig will be used for years on end.

For 1080p I think 980 is going to be better. If you look at current benchmarks, the Fury X has some seriously underwhelming performance at 1080p/1440p.  Air Cooled Fury is not Fury X, it is supposedly something less than that (7/8th 3500/4000 SP) but has the same TDP of 275W, which is concerning, because like Fury X it will probably not be much of an overclocker, especially on air.  Meanwhile, 980 is a legendary OCer. 
 
http://www.pcgamer.com/amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-tested-not-quite-a-980-ti-killer/

Fury is just released. AMD has a track record of improving performance of just released cards. Plus Fury just looks damn cool!

Here's the referenced video from Jay:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEwLtqbBw90
 
The comment section is funny.

Thanks Crimson for Posting the video link, i don't know why it didn't link it in my post, though i had put the link in there.

Thanks everyone, I'm going with a HD 60Hz Monitor so ill go with a GTX 980! Thanks everyone.

Viper453
The fury strikes back http://www.hardware.fr/focus/111/crossfire-radeon-r9-fury-x-fiji-vs-gm200-round-2.html :)

Any english version?

I've always preferred Nvidia cards over ATI/AMD, however for only being a 4GB card, the Fury X, especially having a self contained water cooling system from the get go, is truly an awesome card, that I'd own in a heart beat. If you look at benchmarks, the more the resolution goes up, the closer the gap becomes on the Titan X & 980 Ti. But really comparing the Fury X to a standard 980, is not really a fair comparison, as the Fury X is also $150 more, landing in the 980 Ti range, in which most cases the 980 Ti in most tests comes out victorious. Then again, the Fury X is a very cool & unique card, i love it personally. One other option is to grab 2x GTX 970 and SLi them which will produce the best results in terms of performance, but it also has a the draw back of depending on games to actually have decent SLI support.
 
Overall though, if I had to TELL YOU what you were going to buy, I'd be the GTX 980 Ti without question. More VRAM & better all around performance then the Fury X, and no dependency on SLI support. Just an all around amazing card.

Yeah the fury in crossfire is faster than ti and titan x by a good amount. it wins in 4k performance at least. 

Yeah it does have a low minimum frame rate for some reason, they 295x2 is that same way low minimum fps.