Killmur

Halo_003
Personally, I'm unimpressed to say the least. Mainly I feel that the price is not really justified for the marginal gains it poses. A few %(performance) over the R9 290X really isn't worth an extra 40% of the price. 10-15% would be okay though.
 
Price needs to come down to be competitive IMO. Especially given that the HD 7990 is also $700.

Not to mention with the low amount of memory anyone looking for surround\4K will most likely go the cheaper route and go with the 290X that AMD\ATI has to offer. Nvidia HAD a chance to really nail it for surround\4K support but they blew it. I was thinking of stepping up my 770 SC ACX to a 780 Ti but it's not worth it at this point. I'll wait till the 800 Series and see what the memory situation is like.

Shockjockey
Very tempting but I think something just a little better is coming very soon from NVIDIA.

chump7431
The 680 was top dog for a year.  The Titan made it 6 months.

article from tom's hardware
 As we now know,Nvidia needed around 18,000 GK110s to sell to the government in the form of Tesla cards. So, it made the decision to take GK104 to market first, not necessarily knowing how the card that later became GeForce GTX 680 would fare against AMD’s best effort. 

Gold Leader
Well I was referring to the Ti Suffix where it came from , thereby the explanation
 
The 9800 Pro which uses the R350 VPU, is a refresh of the Radeon 9700 Pro, which has the R300VPU with DX 9.0a, SM2.0a & Pixel Shader 2.0a support, the 9800Pro added Pixel & vertex Shader model 2.0b to the package, which allowed it to be used with DX 9.0b.
 
And later the R360 VPU was made for the Radeon 9800 XT.
 
Radeon 9700 Pro was put up against GeForce4 Ti 4600, matrox parhelia P512, GeForce FX 5800 Ultra and itbeat them all especially whe FSAA & AF were used.
Radeon 9800 Pro came with a 128MB 256Bit DDR1 model and a 256MB 256Bit DDRII model, both were aimed agaisnt the Geforce FX 5900 Ultra, they were able to defeat it with ease.
Radeon 9800 XT was set up against theGeForce FX 5950 Ultra, which it also beaten with plentiful ease.
 
The entire Radeon 9700 & 9800 series were ATi's most successful VGA cards of all time, GeForce FX was NVIDIA's worst of all time, , they did pick up the pace again with their might GeForce 6800 series, which performed on par with ATI's X800 & X850 line of cards.
 
When NVIDIA came with GeForce 7800 GTX ATi came with their delayed R520 VPU, which supported DX 9.0c but it was the only VGA card that could combine FSAA + AF with HDR, with the GeForce 6 & 7 series it was wither HDR + AF or FSAA + AF in most cases the GeForce 7800 GTX was faster, mainly with OpenGL games.
 
When ATi Launched their X1900 XTX NV launched their 7900 GTX & 7900 GX2 to compete with it, ATI's R580 VPU was far more powerful than the G71 in this case, the GeForce 7900 GX2 was needed to keep up with the X1900 XTX, with openGL the Geforce cards were still the better ones to get, but with DirectX TI had the clear lead.
 
So to improve this NVIDIA also launched their Geforce 7950 GX2 line of cards, as where ATi came with their X1950 XTX series, ATi still had a good lead over NVIDIA, but this party didn't last for long as they failed with HD 2900 XT versus GeFroce 8800 GTX, with this G80 monster, the high performance crown was retaken by NVIDIA once again
Their GeForce 8800 GTX & Ultra made new world records also and the basic designs of today's CUDA based GPGPU's are all ancestors of the might G80 GPGPU.