Elahrairah
New Member
- Total Posts : 19
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/04/02 11:28:25
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/15 14:01:00
(permalink)
I noticed that when I put any slight increase on voltage/memory, my firestrike score is actually lower. Fans are all turned to 80-100% and temps stay cool but for some reason, the gpu performs best results with default core/mem. How strange..
|
Balubish
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 101
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2014/06/27 13:48:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/15 23:43:56
(permalink)
There is no bottleneck in the GPU scores. The physics score might be a little low because of the CPU overclock, as will the combined, but the CPU clock doesn't have any impact on the GPU scores. On air, with a very mild effort, one can expect to see between 21k and 24k graphics scores with a single card. In SLI, anywhere from 41k to 46k. With more effort and better cooling 26k on a single card is doable, as is 48k graphics in SLI. That's for Firestrike. For Timespy, in SLI should be in around 14k to 15k and with good cooling and some work, 16-17k is doable. Haven't messed about much with a single card in Timespy, but it appears to be between 7.9k to 8.4k for graphics for a good run. These scores are with a really good loop. FS Single: 25k graphics http://www.3dmark.com/fs/10722382
FS SLI: 48.3k graphics http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11349771Timespy SLI: 16.7k graphics http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1062530
Hehe yeah its not the 6950X that carries that PC at all :P
 Balubish Tech on Youtube, Gaming, Watercooling etc Balubish Music - Youtube, Google Store ,Electronic beats
|
Balubish
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 101
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2014/06/27 13:48:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/15 23:54:04
(permalink)
Elahrairah
I noticed that when I put any slight increase on voltage/memory, my firestrike score is actually lower. Fans are all turned to 80-100% and temps stay cool but for some reason, the gpu performs best results with default core/mem. How strange..
Ur results are fine. Ur CPU is dragging down ur overall score but ur GPU score is fine. Also keep in mind GPU Boost 3.0 runs the GPU faster the lower the temp is and downclock itself the higher temp you have. Compared to my system you actually win on GPU test 2 thanks to faster clocked CPU. CPU do help in some areas even though PC Nerds dont really wanna say that. But when it comes to games higher clock speed is the main issue depending on what game and how its coded. And yes a high OC ur GPU can make it actually perform worse in 3D Mark. 
post edited by Balubish - 2017/01/16 00:01:45
Balubish Tech on Youtube, Gaming, Watercooling etc Balubish Music - Youtube, Google Store ,Electronic beats
|
PietroBR
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1202
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/09/14 06:40:52
- Location: Brazil
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 7
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/16 05:15:06
(permalink)
This is mine, http:/ /www.3dmark.com/fs/10967132 (take out spacebar) I think, unique valid difference is that my CPU is a 3820.
post edited by PietroBR - 2017/01/16 05:17:57
|
Elahrairah
New Member
- Total Posts : 19
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/04/02 11:28:25
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/16 12:43:54
(permalink)
|
kwkrnu72
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 598
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/11/28 14:54:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/16 15:48:51
(permalink)
Balubish
There is no bottleneck in the GPU scores. The physics score might be a little low because of the CPU overclock, as will the combined, but the CPU clock doesn't have any impact on the GPU scores.
On air, with a very mild effort, one can expect to see between 21k and 24k graphics scores with a single card. In SLI, anywhere from 41k to 46k. With more effort and better cooling 26k on a single card is doable, as is 48k graphics in SLI. That's for Firestrike. For Timespy, in SLI should be in around 14k to 15k and with good cooling and some work, 16-17k is doable. Haven't messed about much with a single card in Timespy, but it appears to be between 7.9k to 8.4k for graphics for a good run.
These scores are with a really good loop.
FS Single: 25k graphics
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/10722382
FS SLI: 48.3k graphics
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11349771
Timespy SLI: 16.7k graphics
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1062530
Hehe yeah its not the 6950X that carries that PC at all :P It doesn't have anything to do with graphics scores. Futuremark built their benchmarks, so that the graphics tests aren't effected by CPU clocks. I can run the exact same graphics scores with the CPU at stock clocks as I can with it overclocked. Same as I could with the 5820k, 4790k and 3770k.
|
Balubish
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 101
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2014/06/27 13:48:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/17 00:32:25
(permalink)
kwkrnu72
Balubish
There is no bottleneck in the GPU scores. The physics score might be a little low because of the CPU overclock, as will the combined, but the CPU clock doesn't have any impact on the GPU scores.
On air, with a very mild effort, one can expect to see between 21k and 24k graphics scores with a single card. In SLI, anywhere from 41k to 46k. With more effort and better cooling 26k on a single card is doable, as is 48k graphics in SLI. That's for Firestrike. For Timespy, in SLI should be in around 14k to 15k and with good cooling and some work, 16-17k is doable. Haven't messed about much with a single card in Timespy, but it appears to be between 7.9k to 8.4k for graphics for a good run.
These scores are with a really good loop.
FS Single: 25k graphics
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/10722382
FS SLI: 48.3k graphics
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11349771
Timespy SLI: 16.7k graphics
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1062530
Hehe yeah its not the 6950X that carries that PC at all :P
It doesn't have anything to do with graphics scores. Futuremark built their benchmarks, so that the graphics tests aren't effected by CPU clocks. I can run the exact same graphics scores with the CPU at stock clocks as I can with it overclocked. Same as I could with the 5820k, 4790k and 3770k. Yeah I dont buy it. You have 10-11% higher score on the graphics tests and graphics score with a beast of a CPU. Im a 100% sure that ur CPU is carrying that score up. If not you have to explain to me why its so much faster with same GPU and lower clockspeed plz. And i dont think +150Mhz on ur mem will give you 10% better performance overall with same card. Just look at the picture i posted above and it kinda proves it :) Our systems compared. http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/10722382/fs/10653124#And yes i saw your massive OC on the CPU that also helps. :)
post edited by Balubish - 2017/01/17 00:37:05
Balubish Tech on Youtube, Gaming, Watercooling etc Balubish Music - Youtube, Google Store ,Electronic beats
|
DSP1
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 216
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/09/19 14:49:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/17 03:52:40
(permalink)
Balubish
kwkrnu72
Balubish
There is no bottleneck in the GPU scores. The physics score might be a little low because of the CPU overclock, as will the combined, but the CPU clock doesn't have any impact on the GPU scores.
On air, with a very mild effort, one can expect to see between 21k and 24k graphics scores with a single card. In SLI, anywhere from 41k to 46k. With more effort and better cooling 26k on a single card is doable, as is 48k graphics in SLI. That's for Firestrike. For Timespy, in SLI should be in around 14k to 15k and with good cooling and some work, 16-17k is doable. Haven't messed about much with a single card in Timespy, but it appears to be between 7.9k to 8.4k for graphics for a good run.
These scores are with a really good loop.
FS Single: 25k graphics
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/10722382
FS SLI: 48.3k graphics
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11349771
Timespy SLI: 16.7k graphics
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1062530
Hehe yeah its not the 6950X that carries that PC at all :P
It doesn't have anything to do with graphics scores. Futuremark built their benchmarks, so that the graphics tests aren't effected by CPU clocks. I can run the exact same graphics scores with the CPU at stock clocks as I can with it overclocked. Same as I could with the 5820k, 4790k and 3770k.
Yeah I dont buy it. You have 10-11% higher score on the graphics tests and graphics score with a beast of a CPU. Im a 100% sure that ur CPU is carrying that score up. If not you have to explain to me why its so much faster with same GPU and lower clockspeed plz. And i dont think +150Mhz on ur mem will give you 10% better performance overall with same card. Just look at the picture i posted above and it kinda proves it :) Our systems compared. http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/10722382/fs/10653124#And yes i saw your massive OC on the CPU that also helps. :) Here is mine from yesterday. http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11436571 I had the OC on the card dialed back a bit on this run but I usually get graphics scores above 25K. It is the overall score that is influenced by the cpu. (physics+combined)
|
Balubish
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 101
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2014/06/27 13:48:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/17 04:16:36
(permalink)
Nice hitting that OC on the card.
I gotta bench when I get home if I dont forget, have been a while.
Balubish Tech on Youtube, Gaming, Watercooling etc Balubish Music - Youtube, Google Store ,Electronic beats
|
DSP1
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 216
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/09/19 14:49:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/17 04:28:38
(permalink)
Balubish
Nice hitting that OC on the card.
I gotta bench when I get home if I dont forget, have been a while.
Thanks My first one did about the same on the core but didn't get as high on the Mem oc. Would only go to +600 before artifacts showed up. This new one is stable at 2152 on the core and will go to about +835 on Mem before artifacting. Core will go higher but crashes at 2177 soon after starting the run in FS. Was noticing that I get about +200-250 pts per 200 jump on the Mem oc in the Graphics score. FPS went up as well about 1-2 fps with every jump.
|
kwkrnu72
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 598
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/11/28 14:54:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/17 07:04:38
(permalink)
DSP1
Balubish
kwkrnu72
Balubish
There is no bottleneck in the GPU scores. The physics score might be a little low because of the CPU overclock, as will the combined, but the CPU clock doesn't have any impact on the GPU scores.
On air, with a very mild effort, one can expect to see between 21k and 24k graphics scores with a single card. In SLI, anywhere from 41k to 46k. With more effort and better cooling 26k on a single card is doable, as is 48k graphics in SLI. That's for Firestrike. For Timespy, in SLI should be in around 14k to 15k and with good cooling and some work, 16-17k is doable. Haven't messed about much with a single card in Timespy, but it appears to be between 7.9k to 8.4k for graphics for a good run.
These scores are with a really good loop.
FS Single: 25k graphics
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/10722382
FS SLI: 48.3k graphics
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11349771
Timespy SLI: 16.7k graphics
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1062530
Hehe yeah its not the 6950X that carries that PC at all :P
It doesn't have anything to do with graphics scores. Futuremark built their benchmarks, so that the graphics tests aren't effected by CPU clocks. I can run the exact same graphics scores with the CPU at stock clocks as I can with it overclocked. Same as I could with the 5820k, 4790k and 3770k.
Yeah I dont buy it. You have 10-11% higher score on the graphics tests and graphics score with a beast of a CPU. Im a 100% sure that ur CPU is carrying that score up. If not you have to explain to me why its so much faster with same GPU and lower clockspeed plz. And i dont think +150Mhz on ur mem will give you 10% better performance overall with same card. Just look at the picture i posted above and it kinda proves it :)
Our systems compared.
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/10722382/fs/10653124#
And yes i saw your massive OC on the CPU that also helps. :)
Here is mine from yesterday.
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11436571
I had the OC on the card dialed back a bit on this run but I usually get graphics scores above 25K.
It is the overall score that is influenced by the cpu. (physics+combined)
The clocks on the GPU aren't reading right. That run was done at 2189 / 5500 on the GPU (when it was still on air). Most of the SLI runs were done at 2202 or higher. The highest timespy score was at 2252 / 5556. So yeah, the graphics score is higher....for a reason. Physics are combined are almost all CPU. But when comparing GPUs, the only thing you want to look at is the graphics score. The CPU will have no bearing on that score at all....unless you're running from an AMD platform, and that's more the old tech, than it is the processor itself. As seen on this, the clocks aren't reading right on this run either. http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1062530
Like this: 
post edited by kwkrnu72 - 2017/01/17 07:14:12
|
Balubish
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 101
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2014/06/27 13:48:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/17 07:26:56
(permalink)
Yepp looks good. Also damn nice getting the cards to run at 2252Mhz and that OC on the CPU is nice aswell. No wonder ur score skyrocket.
Balubish Tech on Youtube, Gaming, Watercooling etc Balubish Music - Youtube, Google Store ,Electronic beats
|
kwkrnu72
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 598
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/11/28 14:54:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/17 07:41:54
(permalink)
Just takes cold. Cold water, cold air. The colder they get, the higher they'll boost.
|
Balubish
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 101
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2014/06/27 13:48:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/17 23:53:34
(permalink)
kwkrnu72
Just takes cold. Cold water, cold air. The colder they get, the higher they'll boost.
Yeah sadly I havent gotten a waterblock for my card yet :) But boost 3.0 is really nice for us Watercoolers.
Balubish Tech on Youtube, Gaming, Watercooling etc Balubish Music - Youtube, Google Store ,Electronic beats
|
kwkrnu72
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 598
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/11/28 14:54:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/19 21:54:29
(permalink)
Balubish
kwkrnu72
Just takes cold. Cold water, cold air. The colder they get, the higher they'll boost.
Yeah sadly I havent gotten a waterblock for my card yet :) But boost 3.0 is really nice for us Watercoolers.
Actually, boost 3.0 is a curse....to us overclockers.
|
Balubish
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 101
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2014/06/27 13:48:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/20 00:33:13
(permalink)
kwkrnu72
Balubish
kwkrnu72
Just takes cold. Cold water, cold air. The colder they get, the higher they'll boost.
Yeah sadly I havent gotten a waterblock for my card yet :) But boost 3.0 is really nice for us Watercoolers.
Actually, boost 3.0 is a curse....to us overclockers.
Well yeah but why i said to us watercoolers ;) Cause lower temps means the card runs a bit faster.
Balubish Tech on Youtube, Gaming, Watercooling etc Balubish Music - Youtube, Google Store ,Electronic beats
|
Elahrairah
New Member
- Total Posts : 19
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/04/02 11:28:25
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/21 03:56:13
(permalink)
Should my results not be higher? 3dmark.com/fs/11481882 
post edited by Elahrairah - 2017/01/21 04:03:56
Attached Image(s)
|
Elahrairah
New Member
- Total Posts : 19
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/04/02 11:28:25
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/21 08:07:02
(permalink)
Ok. so just ran 3dmark with 32bit mode and got this The below is when I run force 64bit or just click on launch 3dmark (as shown in picture)  Now when I run 3dmark in the mode compatible for me '64bit' or just click 'launch 3dmark'.. my score is 15800 average. At first I checked the first persons info to see if they have ran their result with 32bit mode and was dissapointed to find they ran in 64bit mode with same cpu (lower clock) and still managed to achieve over 17k score. What is causing such a void in performance?
post edited by Elahrairah - 2017/01/21 08:20:15
|
bg8780
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 2540
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/02/19 14:21:34
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/21 08:53:34
(permalink)
|
Elahrairah
New Member
- Total Posts : 19
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/04/02 11:28:25
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/21 08:56:36
(permalink)
@bg8780, Are you running a watercooled system?
|
Balubish
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 101
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2014/06/27 13:48:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/22 23:44:06
(permalink)
Balubish Tech on Youtube, Gaming, Watercooling etc Balubish Music - Youtube, Google Store ,Electronic beats
|
Elahrairah
New Member
- Total Posts : 19
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/04/02 11:28:25
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/28 13:02:32
(permalink)
Really struggling here folks. Just changed to a new setup: i7 6700k OC @4.6ghz 1.3v Asus maximus VIII Hero Motherboard Brand new G.Skill Trident Z 16GB 3200 DDR4 (CAS14) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW (stock) Samsung Pro 250gb SSD And the score below: 3dmark.com/fs/11551852 I am about to re-install windows and start fresh as i've upgraded from an i7 4790k @4.6ghz and asus maximus VII hero with g.skill trident x ddr3 @2400mhz which was also giving me very low scores (see above previous posts from me).. Really could do with some info/help. I do not have g-sync enabled. Temps always run low on gpu and cpu. nothing else serious running in the background when tests are done. Cannot understand it for the life of me. 
post edited by Elahrairah - 2017/01/28 13:12:47
Attached Image(s)
|
kwkrnu72
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 598
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/11/28 14:54:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/28 14:18:32
(permalink)
Elahrairah
Really struggling here folks.
Just changed to a new setup:
i7 6700k OC @4.6ghz 1.3v
Asus maximus VIII Hero Motherboard
Brand new G.Skill Trident Z 16GB 3200 DDR4 (CAS14)
EVGA GTX 1080 FTW (stock)
Samsung Pro 250gb SSD
And the score below:
3dmark.com/fs/11551852
I am about to re-install windows and start fresh as i've upgraded from an i7 4790k @4.6ghz and asus maximus VII hero with g.skill trident x ddr3 @2400mhz which was also giving me very low scores (see above previous posts from me)..
Really could do with some info/help.
I do not have g-sync enabled. Temps always run low on gpu and cpu. nothing else serious running in the background when tests are done. Cannot understand it for the life of me.
Have you switched to the 2nd bios on the GPU? It'll give a little more power limit, which helps. Also, some screenshots of GPUz sensors tab of a firestrike run would help quite a bit. It'll also help you understand your GPU. Seeing where temps increase, and what the voltages / clocks do at those temps will help you to combat it and get a better score. Using the voltage / frequency curve also helps to lock in a voltage / clock so they're not jumping around so much. The cooler the GPUs run, the better. So if you're looking for a "GOOD" score, turn the fans up to 100%. 
|
Elahrairah
New Member
- Total Posts : 19
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/04/02 11:28:25
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/28 16:09:55
(permalink)
So i've now finished re-installing windows again. I don't have a clue what was stopping the scores on cpu being higher but seems to have resolved now. I've still got the 6700k @4.6ghz but gpu is at stock. Results below: Firestrike: 3dmark.com/3dm/17667319? Firestrike Extreme: 3dmark.com/3dm/17667427? And now Firestrike with OC: 3dmark.com/3dm/17669673?
post edited by Elahrairah - 2017/01/28 19:25:05
|
Elahrairah
New Member
- Total Posts : 19
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/04/02 11:28:25
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/29 11:37:44
(permalink)
Right, I'm done. Managed to finally achieve 20k score from a single card. Happy with that. 3dmark.com/3dm/17682660? 
|
kwkrnu72
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 598
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/11/28 14:54:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/29 11:53:59
(permalink)
Elahrairah
Right, I'm done.
Managed to finally achieve 20k score from a single card. Happy with that.
3dmark.com/3dm/17682660?
What clocks? About 2139 or so?
|
Elahrairah
New Member
- Total Posts : 19
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/04/02 11:28:25
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/01/29 12:18:31
(permalink)
Core clock 2,126 MHz
Memory bus clock 1,377 MHz
|
Elahrairah
New Member
- Total Posts : 19
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/04/02 11:28:25
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/02/27 11:28:23
(permalink)
|
tarpon31
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 326
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/07/21 20:33:59
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/06/14 16:15:15
(permalink)
 https://valid.x86.fr/dday7nRig #1 I9 9900k 5ghz All Cores 64Gb CORSAIR Dominator Platinum 3800mhz. c15 ASUS ROG Maximus XI Hero Noctua NH-D15 Nvidia Rtx Titan 2145mhz core +1400 memory w/Msi Afterburner. Seasonic Prime Ultra Titanium 1000 watt Zalman ZM-9 Neo Black Rig #2 I7 980x 4.3ghz 24gb Corasair Vengeance Pro Series 2400mhz Asus Rampage III Formula EVGA Gtx 1080 Founders Edition 2156mhz +600 memory with Msi Afterburner Seasonic Prime Ultra Titanium 850 watt NZXT Tempest 310 &a
|
kwkrnu72
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 598
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/11/28 14:54:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: GTX 1080 FTW Firestrike results
2017/06/14 18:18:55
(permalink)
|