For anyone else thinking of joining, or posting results here that might get reposted there, keep in mind that the specific request from Stanford staff was for comparisons between these new QRB WUs and the old non-QRB WUs.
For the best example of a post with all the important info, with data from multiple projects, including OS, core, and hardware, see this one:
http://foldingforum.org/v...c.php?p=227877#p227877

well i'll be down 1 gpu and p/s after 9:30 tomorrow morning so no more 8018 at 15,000ppd after 2 days to make 2.22 work that rig will be missing parts  

-ZS-Carpenter
ahhhh, isn't that nice, we get slammed on the bottom of page 5.

... by someone that demonstrates their ignorance of the effect of EVGA's folding program on our output at the beginning of the month.  Well, it's the internet, there are trolls everywhere, even in the beta forum.

Finally got a couple of 8057's running myself! 122k ppd on the 660ti, and 131k ppd on the 670. Not taking away from the SMP at all. Running a bit hotter and I can hear the capacitor whine from one or both cards, but all seems well.

Those are some nice numbers we're throwing out now! Let's see what effect this has on total EVGA production over the course of next week!

-ZS-Carpenter

jkefalas
Running a bit hotter

Really? I'm 7-8c cooler when on a 8057 vs a 8018.

Much cooler here too...

jkefalas

Precision wasn't on so my fan profiles were off. Sheesh, lol. Now definitely running cooler. Gotta find out what that high pitch is now...

 
PSU maybe? My PC P&C 750 would wine when i had it under very high load back when i had a dedicated GPU rig. Your sig does not seem like it would load your psu like that but that is where I would start looking.

Okay, I won't say it, lol.

jkefalas

Precision wasn't on so my fan profiles were off. Sheesh, lol. Now definitely running cooler. Gotta find out what that high pitch is now...

My 650Ti was screaming until I adjusted the clocks to a frequency that wasn't audible...
 
Pulled an 8018 on the 670 this morning

texinga

Thought I'd come back and report on my experiment with attempting to get my Kepler to Fold using the Console Client (ver 6.34).  I did try copying FAHCore_15.exe (ver 2.25, required for Kepler)) to my GPU Console Client folder.  Thought maybe I could snag a WU that would expect to use the 2.25 Core and run.  The problem is that I'm being delivered WUs (like WU 10503) that require FAHCore11 (ver 1.31 from 2009) which get's automatically downloaded and executed.  Kepler doesn't run under that Core, so the WU just hangs.

I know before anyone says it..."just run V7".  I'm a Console lover and can't help myself, but it appears that I'm also not gonna get anywhere with that either.  So, it's goodbye Console for my Kepler, and hello V7.  Gotta quit messing around with this anyway 'cause our 2012 Time Zime Challenge is startin' in a couple days.

As you know I don't have a 6xx video card to test with, but I think there trying very hard to wing us off v6.
I know a few config mods & a few other things I can test that may force a different WU download.
I'd be will to try & give you the results, if you would like?

TheWolf

texinga
Thought I'd come back and report on my experiment with attempting to get my Kepler to Fold using the Console Client (ver 6.34).  I did try copying FAHCore_15.exe (ver 2.25, required for Kepler)) to my GPU Console Client folder.  Thought maybe I could snag a WU that would expect to use the 2.25 Core and run.  The problem is that I'm being delivered WUs (like WU 10503) that require FAHCore11 (ver 1.31 from 2009) which get's automatically downloaded and executed.  Kepler doesn't run under that Core, so the WU just hangs.

I know before anyone says it..."just run V7".  I'm a Console lover and can't help myself, but it appears that I'm also not gonna get anywhere with that either.  So, it's goodbye Console for my Kepler, and hello V7.  Gotta quit messing around with this anyway 'cause our 2012 Time Zime Challenge is startin' in a couple days.

As you know I don't have a 6xx video card to test with, but I think there trying very hard to wing us off v6.
I know a few config mods & a few other things I can test that may force a different WU download.
I'd be will to try & give you the results, if you would like?

You've got enough on your hands helping the team reap the best from V7 these days!  You had shared some flags with me before that I did try, but I got the same results.  Seems these 10503 WUs have my number and "they're after me".    I'm on V7 at least until we get to the other side of the Time Zone Challenge.  As always though, your help is greatly appreciated and useful to us all!  If i could give you a "Blue Ribbon" for it I would!

texinga

TheWolf

texinga
Thought I'd come back and report on my experiment with attempting to get my Kepler to Fold using the Console Client (ver 6.34).  I did try copying FAHCore_15.exe (ver 2.25, required for Kepler)) to my GPU Console Client folder.  Thought maybe I could snag a WU that would expect to use the 2.25 Core and run.  The problem is that I'm being delivered WUs (like WU 10503) that require FAHCore11 (ver 1.31 from 2009) which get's automatically downloaded and executed.  Kepler doesn't run under that Core, so the WU just hangs.

I know before anyone says it..."just run V7".  I'm a Console lover and can't help myself, but it appears that I'm also not gonna get anywhere with that either.  So, it's goodbye Console for my Kepler, and hello V7.  Gotta quit messing around with this anyway 'cause our 2012 Time Zime Challenge is startin' in a couple days.

As you know I don't have a 6xx video card to test with, but I think there trying very hard to wing us off v6.
I know a few config mods & a few other things I can test that may force a different WU download.
I'd be will to try & give you the results, if you would like?

You've got enough on your hands helping the team reap the best from V7 these days!  You had shared some flags with me before that I did try, but I got the same results.  Seems these 10503 WUs have my number and "they're after me".    I'm on V7 at least until we get to the other side of the Time Zone Challenge.  As always though, your help is greatly appreciated and useful to us all!  If i could give you a "Blue Ribbon" for it I would!

I'm sure you may know this already but you can test without actually trying to work a WU.
Delete any current WU in V6 "since its not going to work a core11 anyways on a 6xx card" so don't feel bad for doing it.
Add any flags to the command line you wish to try/test
start v6 & quickly note the IP its trying to connect to, quickly CTRL+C to close before it actually downloads a WU.
Edit: if closed to quick to note the IP you can always look at the FAHlog.txt for the IP it tried to connect to.
If it tried to connect to 171.67.108.21 or 171.67.108.11 its still trying to get a core11 WU.
-betateam -verbosity 9 -gpu 0 would be the 1st flags I would test, with a [clienttype]type=3 added at the end within the client.cfg change the 3 to 1 test again, then 0 then 2.
Only 1,2,3 & 0 actually work, so no since in trying 4 & above.
You can also try different bigpackets=big ,normal & small as this also has a effect at times on what WU it will try to download.
That's about all I can think of to try off the top of my head at the moment. I'll update if I think of anything else.

Edit2: oh ya when deleting be sure to remove file queue.dat & work folder, also doesn't hurt to delete unitinfo.txt & FAHlog.txt.
Those are the 4 things I would remove before testing.
 
Edit3: To add to this I think its all going to come down to the executable file of v6 as I think the type of card 
it picks is embedded into the exe unlike v7 where it looks at a txt file that contains the list of cards
that are usable to fold on & what type of work it should get.
Think they will have to release a updated exe with the 6xx patched in to it
before it will ever work on a 6xx card. So its confused on the type of card & that is why its getting core11 WU's.
Getting a update for v6 is probably out of the question since they would probably prefer to phase out v6.
But wouldn't hurt to try dropping that updated list into the v6 folder to see if it might read it like v7 does.
 
Sorry for all the edits, just trying to think out side the box. lol

Barbarossa

Tex,
since these 8057s are running on both Keplar and Fermis, have you already tried good ol
-forcegpu nvidia_fermi ?

+1
something I forgot about, good catch!

Laptop G53SW i7 2630QM @ 2.0ghz-smp 8
GPU 460m 700/625/1400Mhz
 
Project ID: 8057
Core: OPENMMGPU
Credit: 2549
Frames: 100

 Name: v7-CPU8-460m Slot 00
 Path: 127.0.0.1-36330
 Number of Frames Observed: 300

 Min. Time / Frame : 00:03:51 - 50,495.6 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:03:54 - 49,527.6 PPD
 
Final credit estimate, 13297.00 points

I'm hitting 100k ppd estimated with core 2.22 on both my 460's with shaders @ 1600 :) .  just look at my points for today here.