See my edit above,  they were not, TPF was around 5:38 if I recall correct, HFM for some reason is not showing the actual time/ppd because its not running those project at the moment.
Edit: Here is a example that is probably more correct in time if you look at the Avg. time.
This is what it was actually doing on this project 260 vs 480. These also had smp running.
 
 Project ID: 8010
 Core: OPENMMGPU
 Credit: 2510
 Frames: 100

 Name: 260-2
 Path: \\E5620\fahgpu\
 Number of Frames Observed: 300
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:03:22 - 10,735.8 PPD

 Name: 480
 Path: \\2600k\gpu12\
 Number of Frames Observed: 300
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:02:11 - 16,554.5 PPD
 
 Project ID: 8054
 Core: OPENMMGPU
 Credit: 2387
 Frames: 100

 Name: 260-3
 Path: \\P55-extreme\gpu1\
 Number of Frames Observed: 200
 Min. Time / Frame : 00:04:20 - 7,932.2 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:04:20 - 7,932.2 PPD

 Name: 480
 Path: \\2600k\gpu12\
 Number of Frames Observed: 300
 Min. Time / Frame : 00:02:03 - 16,767.2 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:02:04 - 16,632.0 PPD

 Name: 480-2
 Path: C:\GPU1\
 Number of Frames Observed: 300
 Min. Time / Frame : 00:01:59 - 17,330.8 PPD 
 Cur. Time / Frame : 00:01:59 - 17,330.8 PPD 
 All  Time / Frame : 00:01:59 - 17,330.8 PPD 
 
 Name: 8800GTS
 Path: \\P7p55-ws\gpu1\
 Number of Frames Observed: 100
 Min. Time / Frame : 00:04:43 - 7,287.5 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:04:44 - 7,261.9 PPD

 

Yet more proj. 8018... :)

Xavier Zepherious

my gtx 570 on a 8018 ->21k

anyways #4
8057(0,195,0)

avg tpf 2m2s
longest frame 2ms3
est credit 18264
est ppd 128287

my 560 ti at @950 is beating your 570
1:39-1:41 tpf
est credit 20448
est ppd 176676

jimmycricket
How the hell is a 260 getting better PPD then my 570?
Project ID: 8018
Core: OPENMMGPU
Credit: 5757
Frames: 100


Name: local Slot 02
Path: 127.0.0.1-36330
Number of Frames Observed: 6

Min. Time / Frame : 00:04:53 - 16,976.3 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:04:57 - 16,747.6 PPD
Cur. Time / Frame : 00:05:00 - 16,580.2 PPD
R3F. Time / Frame : 00:04:57 - 16,747.6 PPD
All  Time / Frame : 00:04:56 - 16,804.2 PPD
Eff. Time / Frame : 00:05:30 - 15,072.9 PPD

 
Check your log file to see which version of FahCore_15 you are using.  If you are using 2.25, that is why.  If you have a backup of 2.22 use that, and your PPD should bump back up to around 23-25k PPD depending on your OC.

dbuddle

Check your log file to see which version of FahCore_15 you are using.  If you are using 2.25, that is why.  If you have a backup of 2.22 use that, and your PPD should bump back up to around 23-25k PPD depending on your OC.

 
I'm using 2.25, and can't find where to replace it with 2.22, the only core I see in v7 is a4.

widsss

dbuddle

Check your log file to see which version of FahCore_15 you are using.  If you are using 2.25, that is why.  If you have a backup of 2.22 use that, and your PPD should bump back up to around 23-25k PPD depending on your OC.

I'm using 2.25, and can't find where to replace it with 2.22, the only core I see in v7 is a4.

20:29:25:WU02:FS00:0x15:Folding@Home GPU Core
20:29:25:WU02:FS00:0x15:Version                2.25 (Wed May 9 17:03:01 EDT 2012)
20:29:25:WU02:FS00:0x15:Build host             AmoebaRemote
20:29:25:WU02:FS00:0x15:Board Type             NVIDIA/CUDA
20:29:25:WU02:FS00:0x15:Core                   15

wrinvert

Xavier Zepherious

my gtx 570 on a 8018 ->21k

anyways #4
8057(0,195,0)

avg tpf 2m2s
longest frame 2ms3
est credit 18264
est ppd 128287

my 560 ti at @950 is beating your 570
1:39-1:41 tpf
est credit 20448
est ppd 176676

I dont keep track of logs, I think my 570SC's @ stock 797 were getting over 22K. I havent seen a 8018 in close to 4 days

jimmycricket

C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Roaming\FAHClient\cores\www.stanford.edu\~pande\Win32\AMD64\NVIDIA\Fermi\Core_15.fah

Another reason I like the console, I don't have to go threw a act of congress to find where a file is located.

#5
8057(0,279,0)
tpf 2m5s
shortest 2m4s
est credit: 18100
est PPD 125174
 
at this rate I'll be doing 120k+
80k already dropped 1 8057(18k) and another(18k) coming with SMP and regular gpu Wu's
at least 5k-10(kepler)+2-5k (fermi)
lost one SMP rig (bro's computer finished and picked up)
Doing some work on my other rig now maybe get another smp rig up soon
 
#6
8057 (0,146,7)
tpf 2m5s
 
est Credit 18198
est ppd 125782

 

wrinvert

haha hit 2 on the 680 ftws!:  however the TPF is slower then my 560ti?

Did it force the core update to v2.25 on the 560ti, if not that could explain the difference.

wrinvert

Your reading it backwards, my 560ti is faster then the 680s......

And why I said if it was still running core v2.22 that would explain why the 560ti is faster.

wrinvert

back to the ocean of 8018 heat makers

I've been getting more 8057s then anything else

Are you using 2.25 or 2.22?  An OC'd 580 can get close to 200k with 2.22.

jimmycricket

Sleinous

I believe it's probably gone back to 2.25 but I don't know how to get it back to 2.22 without it just redownloading 2.25 and me not losing this beta lol

Just stop the clients, close it out, make sure nothing using it is still running, then go delete the 2.25 core from the folder and add the 2.22
I did and I got a big boost in my PPD and credit and still kept my  8057 WUs
extreme.pcgameshardware.de/attachments/598474d1351987551-rumpelkammer-pcgh-folding-home-thread-ii-core_15.fah_v2.22.zip

 
Ah thanks! Only issue is I don't think I have 2.22 anymore