Helpful ReplyGPU points/QRB discussion

Page: << < ..1112131415.. > >> Showing page 12 of 28
Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
widsss
ACX Member
  • Total Posts : 426
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/03/07 09:56:20
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/11 16:43:35 (permalink)
If you take a look at our team member summary it shows a large number of people who are already above their daily average with two updates still left in the day. The Wu is definitely more available than it was just a few days ago, hopefully that's a sign that the QRB program is almost public.

 
Intel i7 3770K @ 4.5 Ghz. / Asus P67 Pro / 2 x EVGA GTX 980 SC / 16gb Corsair Vengeance RAM  / 2 x Crucial 64 gb. SSD / 1 Tb. Seagate / Corsair AX 850  / Corsair H100

Intel i7 3930k @ 4.3 Ghz / Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 2 x EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC  /  32 gb Gskill Ripjaws RAM / 256 gb Vertex 4 SSD / Corsair AX1200i / Corsair H110i GT

#331
jimmycricket
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1566
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/11/26 09:42:20
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/11 17:25:33 (permalink)
Won't be long before we have the top spot again, maybe even before the year is over.
Be nice to be top dog for the new year
#332
cblaxx
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1050
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/07/03 22:17:39
  • Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 6
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/11 18:33:48 (permalink)
i really need to get my other 580 up and running but my computer just freezes when i have the second one powered on...

Rig Info:
I7 2700K stock clocks(for now)
Gigabyte P67A-UD7
Corsair Vengeance 4x4GB
EVGA GTX TITAN SC
Corsair AX1200
Custom Water Cooling
Corsair Obsidian 800D
 
        

 

#333
jimmycricket
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1566
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/11/26 09:42:20
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/11 18:36:32 (permalink)
cblaxx

i really need to get my other 580 up and running but my computer just freezes when i have the second one powered on...

Test that 580 in the system by it's self
#334
widsss
ACX Member
  • Total Posts : 426
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/03/07 09:56:20
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/11 18:50:53 (permalink)
I'm pulling 700 watts with a ppd of 470k on a 2600k and 2 580s. OC'd to the limit and crunching a SMP and 2 8057s. I wonder how that compares to a 2p or 4p rig?

Anyone else lurk over at the other team's forum? The silence over there is deafening, surely they aren't partaking in this QRB behind closed doors. If you think we're gonna steamroll to first place anytime soon, think again. They worked hard to gain it and they are working hard to keep it, don't be surprised if they beat us at our own game.

 
Intel i7 3770K @ 4.5 Ghz. / Asus P67 Pro / 2 x EVGA GTX 980 SC / 16gb Corsair Vengeance RAM  / 2 x Crucial 64 gb. SSD / 1 Tb. Seagate / Corsair AX 850  / Corsair H100

Intel i7 3930k @ 4.3 Ghz / Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 2 x EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC  /  32 gb Gskill Ripjaws RAM / 256 gb Vertex 4 SSD / Corsair AX1200i / Corsair H110i GT

#335
Xavier Zepherious
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 4632
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/07/04 12:53:39
  • Location: Medicine Hat ,Alberta, Canada
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 15
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/11 19:00:18 (permalink)
widsss

If you take a look at our team member summary it shows a large number of people who are already above their daily average with two updates still left in the day. The Wu is definitely more available than it was just a few days ago, hopefully that's a sign that the QRB program is almost public.

well Im at 148k for the day with 1 updates left
 
I have :
one smp from 3930k  to drop
one 8018 to drop 
two 8057's (18k each) coming
  
 
if I could catch nothing but 8057 on all 3 gpu's  output 375k for that
add in SMP for 40k-50k (until I get second rig up)
 

 
 
post edited by Xavier Zepherious - 2012/11/11 19:24:26

 
   


Primes found        Affiliate Code:YN2AHK39LH
 
 
#336
gamejrock
New Member
  • Total Posts : 11
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/05/09 15:15:12
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/11 19:14:32 (permalink)
I just put in my old GTX 460 and got an 8057 WU and I'm getting a TPF of 3:18 and Est. PPD of 61K.
Does that sound right? It seems a bit low.


#337
cblaxx
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1050
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/07/03 22:17:39
  • Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 6
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/11 19:20:13 (permalink)
jimmycricket

cblaxx

i really need to get my other 580 up and running but my computer just freezes when i have the second one powered on...

Test that 580 in the system by it's self

 
its not the 580, ive tested it on its own, even RMA'd it to make sure. its not the PSU either, i tried multiple. I think i may have a bad pci slot, but testing that is harder with the watercooling system. I dont have the right SLI fitting to span to a different slot. im working on it. I just got sick of testing and gave up on it for a while. 
 
 
Oh and BTW, this is post #1000!!! man its been a while.

Rig Info:
I7 2700K stock clocks(for now)
Gigabyte P67A-UD7
Corsair Vengeance 4x4GB
EVGA GTX TITAN SC
Corsair AX1200
Custom Water Cooling
Corsair Obsidian 800D
 
        

 

#338
Xavier Zepherious
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 4632
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/07/04 12:53:39
  • Location: Medicine Hat ,Alberta, Canada
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 15
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/11 19:26:47 (permalink)
gamejrock

I just put in my old GTX 460 and got an 8057 WU and I'm getting a TPF of 3:18 and Est. PPD of 61K.
Does that sound right? It seems a bit low.

which core you using v2.25 or v2.22?
2.22 will give you better results (but you have to manually downgrade to get that)
 

 
   


Primes found        Affiliate Code:YN2AHK39LH
 
 
#339
jimmycricket
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1566
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/11/26 09:42:20
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/11 19:27:28 (permalink)
cblaxx

jimmycricket

cblaxx

i really need to get my other 580 up and running but my computer just freezes when i have the second one powered on...

Test that 580 in the system by it's self


Its not the 580, I've tested it on its own, even RMA'd it to make sure. its not the PSU either, i tried multiple. I think i may have a bad PCI-E slot, but testing that is harder with the watercooling system. I don't have the right SLI fitting to span to a different slot. I'm working on it. I just got sick of testing and gave up on it for a while. 


Oh and BTW, this is post #1000!!! man its been a while.

Congrats!
That's one of the reason I don't mess with watercooling
Too much of a hassle if something fails
#340
gamejrock
New Member
  • Total Posts : 11
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/05/09 15:15:12
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/11 20:50:01 (permalink)
Xavier Zepherious

gamejrock

I just put in my old GTX 460 and got an 8057 WU and I'm getting a TPF of 3:18 and Est. PPD of 61K.
Does that sound right? It seems a bit low.

which core you using v2.25 or v2.22?
2.22 will give you better results (but you have to manually downgrade to get that)


 
Ahh right, I totally forgot about that. 
TPF is down to 2:30 now.


#341
Simba123
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 2853
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/05/10 23:15:21
  • Location: Australia
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 14
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/11 21:38:42 (permalink)
Grabbed a couple, PPD according to HFM
i7 2600K @ 4.5 SMP8 - P8049(R139,C1,G133) = 16222 PPD
660ti (1097/3055) -     P8057(R0,C265,G4)     = 110,558 PPD
560TI(925/2005) -       P8057(R0,C186,G11)   = 86782    PPD
                                                    Total        = 214,462 PPD
 
The 560Ti is a bit low because I'm using V7 so I have to have the 2.25
core.
 
 
 


 
 
  
                               
 
#342
F_I_N
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 675
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/08/31 14:37:41
  • Location: British Columbia
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/11 21:53:50 (permalink)
I just had something wierd happen...
 
I had a couple of 8057 work units folding on my 680's they were pretty much going to finish at the same time . One picked up a 7623 work unit The 680 picked up a 8057 work unit. I walked away came back to check on things and found that the 8057 work unit had some kind of error and was punted and picked a 8018 work unit for replacement
 
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:Connecting to assign-GPU.stanford.edu:80
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:News: Welcome to [link=mailto:Folding@Home]Folding@Home[/link]
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.67.108.144
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: RUNNING gpu:0:"GF114 [GeForce GTX 680]" from 171.67.108.144
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.144:8080
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:Downloading 24.74KiB
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:Download complete
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:Received Unit: id:00 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR project:8057 run:0 clone:148 gen:13 core:0x15 unit:0x000000146953ee30508b38a9cacd5cf1
05:32:24:WU01:FS00:0x15:Completed  50000000 out of 50000000 steps (100%).
05:32:24:WU01:FS00:0x15:Finished fah_main status=0
05:32:24:WU01:FS00:0x15:Successful run
05:32:24:WU01:FS00:0x15:DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Reserved 326424 bytes for xtc file; Cosm status=0
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Allocated 326424 bytes for xtc file
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Reading up to 326424 from "01/wudata_01.xtc": Read 326424
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Read 326424 bytes from xtc file; available packet space=786104040
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:xtc file hash check passed.
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Reserved 20400 20400 786104040 bytes for arc file=<01/wudata_01.trr> Cosm status=0
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Allocated 20400 bytes for arc file
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Reading up to 20400 from "01/wudata_01.trr": Read 20400
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Read 20400 bytes from arc file; available packet space=786083640
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:trr file hash check passed.
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Allocated 544 bytes for edr file
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Read bedfile
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:edr file hash check passed.
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Allocated 36781 bytes for logfile
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Read logfile
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:GuardedRun: success in DynamicWrapper
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:GuardedRun: done
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Run: GuardedRun completed.
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:+ Opened results file
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Writing 384661 bytes of core data to disk...
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:Done: 384149 -> 352940 (compressed to 91.8 percent)
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:  ... Done.
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:DeleteFrameFiles: successfully deleted file=01/wudata_01.ckp
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:Shutting down core
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64)
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:8057 run:0 clone:309 gen:3 core:0x15 unit:0x000000036953ee30508b38b40deab612
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:Uploading 345.17KiB to 171.67.108.144
05:32:39:WU00:FS00:Starting
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.144:8080
05:32:39:WU00:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/Glens/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/NVIDIA/Fermi/beta/Core_15.fah/FahCore_15.exe -dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 702 -lifeline 5712 -checkpoint 15 -gpu 0
05:32:39:WU00:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 2332
05:32:39:WU00:FS00:Core PID:5456
05:32:39:WU00:FS00:FahCore 0x15 started
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:*------------------------------*
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Folding@Home GPU Core
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Version                2.25 (Wed May 9 17:03:01 EDT 2012)
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Build host             AmoebaRemote
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Board Type             NVIDIA/CUDA
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Core                   15
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Window's signal control handler registered.
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Preparing to commence simulation
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:- Looking at optimizations...
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:DeleteFrameFiles: successfully deleted file=00/wudata_01.ckp
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:- Created dyn
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:- Files status OK
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:sizeof(CORE_PACKET_HDR) = 512 file=<>
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:- Expanded 24820 -> 147034 (decompressed 592.4 percent)
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=24820 data_size=147034, decompressed_data_size=147034 diff=0
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:- Digital signature verified
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Project: 8057 (Run 0, Clone 148, Gen 13)
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Assembly optimizations on if available.
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Entering M.D.
05:32:42:WU00:FS00:0x15:Tpr hash 00/wudata_01.tpr:  1620551085 3558789170 1057902661 945192626 1823041927
05:32:42:WU00:FS00:0x15:GPU device id=0
05:32:42:WU00:FS00:0x15:mdrun_gpu returned -1
05:32:42:WU00:FS00:0x15:Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=0
05:32:42:WU00:FS00:0x15:Work fraction=0.0000 steps=0.
05:32:42:WU01:FS00:Upload complete
05:32:42:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
05:32:42:WU01:FS00:Final credit estimate, 17350.00 points
05:32:42:WU01:FS00:Cleaning up
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:logfile size=0 infoLength=0 edr=0 trr=25
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:+ Opened results file
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:- Writing 634 bytes of core data to disk...
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:Done: 122 -> 120 (compressed to 98.3 percent)
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:  ... Done.
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:DeleteFrameFiles: successfully deleted file=00/wudata_01.ckp
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNSTABLE_MACHINE
05:32:46:WARNING:WU00:FS00:FahCore returned: UNSTABLE_MACHINE (122 = 0x7a)
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:8057 run:0 clone:148 gen:13 core:0x15 unit:0x000000146953ee30508b38a9cacd5cf1
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:Uploading 632B to 171.67.108.144
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.144:8080
05:32:46:WU01:FS00:Connecting to assign-GPU.stanford.edu:80
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:Upload complete
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up
05:32:47:WU01:FS00:News: Welcome to [link=mailto:Folding@Home]Folding@Home[/link]
05:32:47:WU01:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.67.108.142
05:32:47:WU01:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY gpu:0:"GF114 [GeForce GTX 680]" from 171.67.108.142
05:32:47:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.142:8080
05:32:47:WU01:FS00:Downloading 142.46KiB
05:32:47:WU01:FS00:Download complete
05:32:47:WU01:FS00:Received Unit: id:01 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR project:8018 run:1182 clone:1 gen:7 core:0x15 unit:0x000000096953ee2e500f1f6921d215cc
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:Starting
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/Glens/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/NVIDIA/Fermi/beta/Core_15.fah/FahCore_15.exe -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 702 -lifeline 5712 -checkpoint 15 -gpu 0
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 2188
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:Core PID:2268
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:FahCore 0x15 started
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:*------------------------------*
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Folding@Home GPU Core
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Version                2.25 (Wed May 9 17:03:01 EDT 2012)
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Build host             AmoebaRemote
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Board Type             NVIDIA/CUDA
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Core                   15
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Window's signal control handler registered.
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Preparing to commence simulation
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Looking at optimizations...
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:DeleteFrameFiles: successfully deleted file=01/wudata_01.ckp
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Created dyn
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Files status OK
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:sizeof(CORE_PACKET_HDR) = 512 file=<>
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Expanded 145371 -> 660986 (decompressed 454.6 percent)
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=145371 data_size=660986, decompressed_data_size=660986 diff=0
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Digital signature verified
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Project: 8018 (Run 1182, Clone 1, Gen 7)
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Assembly optimizations on if available.
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Entering M.D.
05:32:50:WU01:FS00:0x15:Tpr hash 01/wudata_01.tpr:  713512248 3970426948 3645068527 3688850908 2969401932
05:32:50:WU01:FS00:0x15:GPU device id=0
05:32:50:WU01:FS00:0x15:Working on GRowing Old MAkes el Chrono Sweat
05:32:50:WU01:FS00:0x15:Client config unavailable.
05:32:50:WU01:FS00:0x15:Starting GUI Server
05:32:57:WU02:FS01:0x15:Completed   1600000 out of 40000000 steps (4%).
05:33:58:WU01:FS00:0x15:Setting checkpoint frequency: 250000
05:33:58:WU01:FS00:0x15:Completed         3 out of 25000000 steps (0%).
05:37:43:WU01:FS00:0x15:Completed    250000 out of 25000000 steps (1%).
05:37:45:WU02:FS01:0x15:Completed   2000000 out of 40000000 steps (5%).
05:41:30:WU01:FS00:0x15:Completed    500000 out of 25000000 steps (2%).
05:42:33:WU02:FS01:0x15:Completed   2400000 out of 40000000 steps (6%).
05:45:16:WU01:FS00:0x15:Completed    750000 out of 25000000 steps (3%).
05:47:20:WU02:FS01:0x15:Completed   2800000 out of 40000000 steps (7%).
05:49:00:WU01:FS00:0x15:Completed   1000000 out of 25000000 steps (4%).
05:52:06:WU02:FS01:0x15:Completed   3200000 out of 40000000 steps (8%).
05:52:44:WU01:FS00:0x15:Completed   1250000 out of 25000000 steps (5%).

 




  

 
#343
Xavier Zepherious
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 4632
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/07/04 12:53:39
  • Location: Medicine Hat ,Alberta, Canada
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 15
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/11 22:52:58 (permalink)
F_I_N

I just had something wierd happen...

I had a couple of 8057 work units folding on my 680's they were pretty much going to finish at the same time . One picked up a 7623 work unit The 680 picked up a 8057 work unit. I walked away came back to check on things and found that the 8057 work unit had some kind of error and was punted and picked a 8018 work unit for replacement

05:30:42:WU00:FS00:Connecting to assign-GPU.stanford.edu:80
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:News: Welcome to [link=mailto:Folding@Home]Folding@Home[/link]
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.67.108.144
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: RUNNING gpu:0:"GF114 [GeForce GTX 680]" from 171.67.108.144
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.144:8080
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:Downloading 24.74KiB
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:Download complete
05:30:42:WU00:FS00:Received Unit: id:00 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR project:8057 run:0 clone:148 gen:13 core:0x15 unit:0x000000146953ee30508b38a9cacd5cf1

 
dowloaded a new wu0 
 

05:32:24:WU01:FS00:0x15:Completed  50000000 out of 50000000 steps (100%).
05:32:24:WU01:FS00:0x15:Finished fah_main status=0
05:32:24:WU01:FS00:0x15:Successful run
05:32:24:WU01:FS00:0x15:DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Reserved 326424 bytes for xtc file; Cosm status=0
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Allocated 326424 bytes for xtc file
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Reading up to 326424 from "01/wudata_01.xtc": Read 326424
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Read 326424 bytes from xtc file; available packet space=786104040
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:xtc file hash check passed.
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Reserved 20400 20400 786104040 bytes for arc file=<01/wudata_01.trr> Cosm status=0
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Allocated 20400 bytes for arc file
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Reading up to 20400 from "01/wudata_01.trr": Read 20400
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Read 20400 bytes from arc file; available packet space=786083640
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:trr file hash check passed.
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Allocated 544 bytes for edr file
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Read bedfile
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:edr file hash check passed.
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Allocated 36781 bytes for logfile
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Read logfile
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:GuardedRun: success in DynamicWrapper
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:GuardedRun: done
05:32:34:WU01:FS00:0x15:Run: GuardedRun completed.
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:+ Opened results file
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Writing 384661 bytes of core data to disk...
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:Done: 384149 -> 352940 (compressed to 91.8 percent)
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:  ... Done.
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:DeleteFrameFiles: successfully deleted file=01/wudata_01.ckp
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:Shutting down core
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:0x15:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64)
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:8057 run:0 clone:309 gen:3 core:0x15 unit:0x000000036953ee30508b38b40deab612
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:Uploading 345.17KiB to 171.67.108.144
05:32:39:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.144:8080 
05:32:42:WU01:FS00:Upload complete 
05:32:42:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400) 
05:32:42:WU01:FS00:Final credit estimate, 17350.00 points 
05:32:42:WU01:FS00:Cleaning up 

 
wu1 uploaded for 17k

 

05:32:39:WU00:FS00:Starting

05:32:39:WU00:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/Glens/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/NVIDIA/Fermi/beta/Core_15.fah/FahCore_15.exe -dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 702 -lifeline 5712 -checkpoint 15 -gpu 0
05:32:39:WU00:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 2332
05:32:39:WU00:FS00:Core PID:5456
05:32:39:WU00:FS00:FahCore 0x15 started
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:*------------------------------*
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Folding@Home GPU Core
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Version                2.25 (Wed May 9 17:03:01 EDT 2012)
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Build host             AmoebaRemote
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Board Type             NVIDIA/CUDA
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Core                   15
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Window's signal control handler registered.
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Preparing to commence simulation
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:- Looking at optimizations...
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:DeleteFrameFiles: successfully deleted file=00/wudata_01.ckp
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:- Created dyn
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:- Files status OK
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:sizeof(CORE_PACKET_HDR) = 512 file=<>
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:- Expanded 24820 -> 147034 (decompressed 592.4 percent)
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=24820 data_size=147034, decompressed_data_size=147034 diff=0
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:- Digital signature verified
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Project: 8057 (Run 0, Clone 148, Gen 13)
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Assembly optimizations on if available.
05:32:40:WU00:FS00:0x15:Entering M.D.
05:32:42:WU00:FS00:0x15:Tpr hash 00/wudata_01.tpr:  1620551085 3558789170 1057902661 945192626 1823041927
05:32:42:WU00:FS00:0x15:GPU device id=0
05:32:42:WU00:FS00:0x15:mdrun_gpu returned -1
05:32:42:WU00:FS00:0x15:Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=0
05:32:42:WU00:FS00:0x15:Work fraction=0.0000 steps=0.

05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:logfile size=0 infoLength=0 edr=0 trr=25
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:+ Opened results file
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:- Writing 634 bytes of core data to disk...
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:Done: 122 -> 120 (compressed to 98.3 percent)
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:  ... Done.
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:DeleteFrameFiles: successfully deleted file=00/wudata_01.ckp
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:0x15:Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNSTABLE_MACHINE
05:32:46:WARNING:WU00:FS00:FahCore returned: UNSTABLE_MACHINE (122 = 0x7a)
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:8057 run:0 clone:148 gen:13 core:0x15 unit:0x000000146953ee30508b38a9cacd5cf1
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:Uploading 632B to 171.67.108.144
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.144:8080

 
new wu0 failed

05:32:46:WU01:FS00:Connecting to assign-GPU.stanford.edu:80
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:Upload complete
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
05:32:46:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up
05:32:47:WU01:FS00:News: Welcome to [link=mailto:Folding@Home]Folding@Home[/link]
05:32:47:WU01:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.67.108.142
05:32:47:WU01:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY gpu:0:"GF114 [GeForce GTX 680]" from 171.67.108.142
05:32:47:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.142:8080
05:32:47:WU01:FS00:Downloading 142.46KiB
05:32:47:WU01:FS00:Download complete
05:32:47:WU01:FS00:Received Unit: id:01 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR project:8018 run:1182 clone:1 gen:7 core:0x15 unit:0x000000096953ee2e500f1f6921d215cc
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:Starting
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/Glens/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/NVIDIA/Fermi/beta/Core_15.fah/FahCore_15.exe -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 702 -lifeline 5712 -checkpoint 15 -gpu 0
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 2188
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:Core PID:2268
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:FahCore 0x15 started
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:*------------------------------*
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Folding@Home GPU Core
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Version                2.25 (Wed May 9 17:03:01 EDT 2012)
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Build host             AmoebaRemote
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Board Type             NVIDIA/CUDA
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Core                   15
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Window's signal control handler registered.
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Preparing to commence simulation
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Looking at optimizations...
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:DeleteFrameFiles: successfully deleted file=01/wudata_01.ckp
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Created dyn
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Files status OK
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:sizeof(CORE_PACKET_HDR) = 512 file=<>
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Expanded 145371 -> 660986 (decompressed 454.6 percent)
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=145371 data_size=660986, decompressed_data_size=660986 diff=0
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:- Digital signature verified
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Project: 8018 (Run 1182, Clone 1, Gen 7)
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Assembly optimizations on if available.
05:32:48:WU01:FS00:0x15:Entering M.D.
05:32:50:WU01:FS00:0x15:Tpr hash 01/wudata_01.tpr:  713512248 3970426948 3645068527 3688850908 2969401932
05:32:50:WU01:FS00:0x15:GPU device id=0
05:32:50:WU01:FS00:0x15:Working on GRowing Old MAkes el Chrono Sweat
05:32:50:WU01:FS00:0x15:Client config unavailable.
05:32:50:WU01:FS00:0x15:Starting GUI Server
05:32:57:WU02:FS01:0x15:Completed   1600000 out of 40000000 steps (4%).
05:33:58:WU01:FS00:0x15:Setting checkpoint frequency: 250000
05:33:58:WU01:FS00:0x15:Completed         3 out of 25000000 steps (0%).
05:37:43:WU01:FS00:0x15:Completed    250000 out of 25000000 steps (1%).
05:37:45:WU02:FS01:0x15:Completed   2000000 out of 40000000 steps (5%).
05:41:30:WU01:FS00:0x15:Completed    500000 out of 25000000 steps (2%).
05:42:33:WU02:FS01:0x15:Completed   2400000 out of 40000000 steps (6%).
05:45:16:WU01:FS00:0x15:Completed    750000 out of 25000000 steps (3%).
05:47:20:WU02:FS01:0x15:Completed   2800000 out of 40000000 steps (7%).
05:49:00:WU01:FS00:0x15:Completed   1000000 out of 25000000 steps (4%).
05:52:06:WU02:FS01:0x15:Completed   3200000 out of 40000000 steps (8%).
05:52:44:WU01:FS00:0x15:Completed   1250000 out of 25000000 steps (5%).

 
be aware
corestatus error 7a 122 
 
screensaver
powersave
remote login causes this
 
 
i had my own issue
server failed... so I couldn't get a wu or DL/UL for awhile
I wasn't the only one to post an issue...after post to FF the server was brought back up
 
post edited by Xavier Zepherious - 2012/11/11 23:02:07

 
   


Primes found        Affiliate Code:YN2AHK39LH
 
 
#344
Rolo42
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 103
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/10/30 11:52:12
  • Location: Pike's Peak
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 00:24:24 (permalink)
Simba123
The 560Ti is a bit low because I'm using V7 so I have to have the 2.25
core.

I'm running 2.22 core with v7.2.9 on 2 PCs w/580s and get improved TPF/PPD; you should have no problem either.
 


#345
Simba123
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 2853
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/05/10 23:15:21
  • Location: Australia
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 14
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 01:49:42 (permalink)
Rolo42

Simba123
The 560Ti is a bit low because I'm using V7 so I have to have the 2.25
core.

I'm running 2.22 core with v7.2.9 on 2 PCs w/580s and get improved TPF/PPD; you should have no problem either.


 
This is true, however I am running a Kepler (660ti) and a Fermi (560ti) in the same system and using the same program (V7).  My understanding is that you cannot have 2 version of the core under the same program. 
If I forced 2.22, I would not be able to fold on the Kepler.
 
 


 
 
  
                               
 
#346
texinga
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
  • Total Posts : 5121
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/07/03 14:30:32
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 20
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 04:18:00 (permalink)
Regarding the many posts that recommend using FAHCore_15 version 2.22 vs 2.25, I have a couple questions.
  • Using the Pande FTP site where they keep copies of the various Cores/versions, the file there does not have a file extension.  I would expect that the file needs to be changed to be an "exe" file to be used, but I don't know for sure.  So, what are people doing with that file after you download it to make it useful to the Folding program?
  • I see people saying that they are keeping a copy of the Core file (version 2.22) in a separate Folder and using it to make sure they are not running the 2.25 version.  In practical form, what exactly are you doing with that file?  Are you keeping it in a separate Folder so that when ver 2.25 is auto down-loaded by V7, you can copy it (ver 2.22) back over into the associated V7 Folder for use?  I keep reading about people doing this stuff, but don't have a clear (layman's) understanding of exactly what you are doing to make these changes and when you are making them.
I'm trying to follow what some of you are doing with the 2.22 Core, but just am not fully understanding it, so I'd appreciate so help.  Thanks.
post edited by texinga - 2012/11/12 04:23:11



#347
jimmycricket
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1566
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/11/26 09:42:20
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 04:39:49 (permalink)
texinga

Regarding the many posts that recommend using FAHCore_15 version 2.22 vs 2.25, I have a couple questions.
  • Using the Pande FTP site where they keep copies of the various Cores/versions, the file there does not have a file extension.  I would expect that the file needs to be changed to be an "exe" file to be used, but I don't know for sure.  So, what are people doing with that file after you download it to make it useful to the Folding program?
  • I see people saying that they are keeping a copy of the Core file (version 2.22) in a separate Folder and using it to make sure they are not running the 2.25 version.  In practical form, what exactly are you doing with that file?  Are you keeping it in a separate Folder so that when ver 2.25 is auto down-loaded by V7, you can copy it (ver 2.22) back over into the associated V7 Folder for use?  I keep reading about people doing this stuff, but don't have a clear (layman's) understanding of exactly what you are doing to make these changes and when you are making them.
I'm trying to follow what some of you are doing with the 2.22 Core, but just am not fully understanding it, so I'd appreciate so help.  Thanks.
What's so hard to understand? If v7 re-downloads 2.25 then you have  a backup of 2.22 to replace

#348
texinga
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
  • Total Posts : 5121
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/07/03 14:30:32
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 20
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 05:10:16 (permalink)
jimmycricket
texinga
Regarding the many posts that recommend using FAHCore_15 version 2.22 vs 2.25, I have a couple questions.
  • Using the Pande FTP site where they keep copies of the various Cores/versions, the file there does not have a file extension.  I would expect that the file needs to be changed to be an "exe" file to be used, but I don't know for sure.  So, what are people doing with that file after you download it to make it useful to the Folding program?
  • I see people saying that they are keeping a copy of the Core file (version 2.22) in a separate Folder and using it to make sure they are not running the 2.25 version.  In practical form, what exactly are you doing with that file?  Are you keeping it in a separate Folder so that when ver 2.25 is auto down-loaded by V7, you can copy it (ver 2.22) back over into the associated V7 Folder for use?  I keep reading about people doing this stuff, but don't have a clear (layman's) understanding of exactly what you are doing to make these changes and when you are making them.
I'm trying to follow what some of you are doing with the 2.22 Core, but just am not fully understanding it, so I'd appreciate so help.  Thanks.
What's so hard to understand? If v7 re-downloads 2.25 then you have  a backup of 2.22 to replace

Well, that was a "lot of help"...hopefully someone else will read my post and actually care to answer.



#349
jimmycricket
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1566
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/11/26 09:42:20
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 05:24:20 (permalink)
texinga

jimmycricket
texinga
Regarding the many posts that recommend using FAHCore_15 version 2.22 vs 2.25, I have a couple questions.
  • Using the Pande FTP site where they keep copies of the various Cores/versions, the file there does not have a file extension.  I would expect that the file needs to be changed to be an "exe" file to be used, but I don't know for sure.  So, what are people doing with that file after you download it to make it useful to the Folding program?
  • I see people saying that they are keeping a copy of the Core file (version 2.22) in a separate Folder and using it to make sure they are not running the 2.25 version.  In practical form, what exactly are you doing with that file?  Are you keeping it in a separate Folder so that when ver 2.25 is auto down-loaded by V7, you can copy it (ver 2.22) back over into the associated V7 Folder for use?  I keep reading about people doing this stuff, but don't have a clear (layman's) understanding of exactly what you are doing to make these changes and when you are making them.
I'm trying to follow what some of you are doing with the 2.22 Core, but just am not fully understanding it, so I'd appreciate so help.  Thanks.
What's so hard to understand? If v7 re-downloads 2.25 then you have  a backup of 2.22 to replace

Well, that was a "lot of help"...hopefully someone else will read my post and actually care to answer.

Well you're not exactly explaining what's so hard for you to understand
#350
Sleinous
EVGA Forum Moderator
  • Total Posts : 7459
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/06/12 12:22:01
  • Location: Paris, France
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 31
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 05:25:06 (permalink)
To (try) and answer your question, it's not automatic or anything - I assume those that put it in a seperate folder its for practicality. Basically as soon as your PPD lowers you know you're back on 2.25 so just quit your v7, copy paste the 2.22 back into the directory to overwrite 2.25 then restart folding clients. It's basically all we can do as of now.
post edited by Sleinous - 2012/11/12 06:06:01
#351
mflanaga
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3033
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/05/13 18:48:11
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 15
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 05:27:05 (permalink)
Here you go texinga:

extreme.pcgameshardware.de/attachments/598474d1351987551-rumpelkammer-pcgh-folding-home-thread-ii-core_15.fah_v2.22.zip

Just make another folder in the same directory as the the 2.25 core, right next to it (for convenience). Dump the 2.25 and replace with the 2.22 when needed.
 
Credit to jimmycricket for his link in another post
post edited by mflanaga - 2012/11/12 05:28:25

   
             
  
      
#352
texinga
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
  • Total Posts : 5121
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/07/03 14:30:32
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 20
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 05:30:54 (permalink)
jimmycricket
texinga
jimmycricket
texinga
Regarding the many posts that recommend using FAHCore_15 version 2.22 vs 2.25, I have a couple questions.
  • Using the Pande FTP site where they keep copies of the various Cores/versions, the file there does not have a file extension.  I would expect that the file needs to be changed to be an "exe" file to be used, but I don't know for sure.  So, what are people doing with that file after you download it to make it useful to the Folding program?
  • I see people saying that they are keeping a copy of the Core file (version 2.22) in a separate Folder and using it to make sure they are not running the 2.25 version.  In practical form, what exactly are you doing with that file?  Are you keeping it in a separate Folder so that when ver 2.25 is auto down-loaded by V7, you can copy it (ver 2.22) back over into the associated V7 Folder for use?  I keep reading about people doing this stuff, but don't have a clear (layman's) understanding of exactly what you are doing to make these changes and when you are making them.
I'm trying to follow what some of you are doing with the 2.22 Core, but just am not fully understanding it, so I'd appreciate so help.  Thanks.
What's so hard to understand? If v7 re-downloads 2.25 then you have  a backup of 2.22 to replace

Well, that was a "lot of help"...hopefully someone else will read my post and actually care to answer.

Well you're not exactly explaining what's so hard for you to understand

...and maybe you have some reading comprehension challenges?  I was pretty clear and my questions were not hard to understand.  Is there some reason you feel the need to be this rude to a fellow team member today?  We are a team last time I checked and your answer was pretty far from being helpful to another member.  Many times people (including myself) have answered questions for other team members (multiple times too) and that has been a positive of this team...or at least it used to be.



#353
texinga
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
  • Total Posts : 5121
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/07/03 14:30:32
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 20
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 05:33:38 (permalink)
Thank-you Slenous and MF for the replies.



#354
jimmycricket
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1566
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/11/26 09:42:20
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 05:37:38 (permalink)
texinga

jimmycricket
texinga
jimmycricket
texinga
Regarding the many posts that recommend using FAHCore_15 version 2.22 vs 2.25, I have a couple questions.
  • Using the Pande FTP site where they keep copies of the various Cores/versions, the file there does not have a file extension.  I would expect that the file needs to be changed to be an "exe" file to be used, but I don't know for sure.  So, what are people doing with that file after you download it to make it useful to the Folding program?
  • I see people saying that they are keeping a copy of the Core file (version 2.22) in a separate Folder and using it to make sure they are not running the 2.25 version.  In practical form, what exactly are you doing with that file?  Are you keeping it in a separate Folder so that when ver 2.25 is auto down-loaded by V7, you can copy it (ver 2.22) back over into the associated V7 Folder for use?  I keep reading about people doing this stuff, but don't have a clear (layman's) understanding of exactly what you are doing to make these changes and when you are making them.
I'm trying to follow what some of you are doing with the 2.22 Core, but just am not fully understanding it, so I'd appreciate so help.  Thanks.
What's so hard to understand? If v7 re-downloads 2.25 then you have  a backup of 2.22 to replace

Well, that was a "lot of help"...hopefully someone else will read my post and actually care to answer.

Well you're not exactly explaining what's so hard for you to understand

...and maybe you have some reading comprehension challenges?  I was pretty clear and my questions were not hard to understand.  Is there some reason you feel the need to be this rude to a fellow team member today?  We are a team last time I checked and your answer was pretty far from being helpful to another member.  Many times people (including myself) have answered questions for other team members (multiple times too) and that has been a positive of this team...or at least it used to be.

Awe is someone getting mad because they lacking understanding of something so simple?
I find it incredibly funny that you're trying to insult my reading ability when you're the one that can't read that members are deleting the 2.25 core and replacing it with the 2.22 core.
And being rude to other members? Where exactly am I being rude and to whom?
 
Up there in BOLD is exactly what everyone is doing but for some strange reason you can't comprehend that
#355
texinga
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
  • Total Posts : 5121
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/07/03 14:30:32
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 20
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 05:43:10 (permalink)
jimmycricket
Awe is someone getting mad because they lacking understanding of something so simple?
I find it incredibly funny that you're trying to insult my reading ability when you're the one that can't read that members are deleting the 2.25 core and replacing it with the 2.22 core.
And being rude to other members? Where exactly am I being rude and to whom?

Up there in BOLD is exactly what everyone is doing but for some strange reason you can't comprehend that

So you're so knowledgeable now that unless someone asks a question in exactly the way that you want it, they don't deserve a polite response or help?  Hmmm...if this is any example of the team we have become, then it may be time to consider other things.



#356
jimmycricket
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1566
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/11/26 09:42:20
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 05:47:42 (permalink)
texinga

jimmycricket
Awe is someone getting mad because they lacking understanding of something so simple?
I find it incredibly funny that you're trying to insult my reading ability when you're the one that can't read that members are deleting the 2.25 core and replacing it with the 2.22 core.
And being rude to other members? Where exactly am I being rude and to whom?

Up there in BOLD is exactly what everyone is doing but for some strange reason you can't comprehend that

So you're so knowledgeable now that unless someone asks a question in exactly the way that you want it, they don't deserve a polite response or help?  Hmmm...if this is any example of the team we have become, then it may be time to consider other things.

Dude, seriously, what is your malfunction? Are you on drugs or something?
 
#357
mflanaga
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3033
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/05/13 18:48:11
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 15
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 06:03:45 (permalink)
jimmycricket:
this was the first part of the texinga's question which was ignored..
 
 Using the Pande FTP site where they keep copies of the various Cores/versions, the file there does not have a file extension. I would expect that the file needs to be changed to be an "exe" file to be used, but I don't know for sure. So, what are people doing with that file after you download it to make it useful to the Folding program?
 
the rest was just asking for some clarity. The question has been answered, so really there's no need for further hostilities. Cut it out already and fold everyone.. like grownups should. Any further discussion should get back to the OP
post edited by mflanaga - 2012/11/12 06:05:22

   
             
  
      
#358
Simba123
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 2853
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/05/10 23:15:21
  • Location: Australia
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 14
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 06:11:28 (permalink)
jimmycricket

texinga

jimmycricket
Awe is someone getting mad because they lacking understanding of something so simple?
I find it incredibly funny that you're trying to insult my reading ability when you're the one that can't read that members are deleting the 2.25 core and replacing it with the 2.22 core.
And being rude to other members? Where exactly am I being rude and to whom?

Up there in BOLD is exactly what everyone is doing but for some strange reason you can't comprehend that

So you're so knowledgeable now that unless someone asks a question in exactly the way that you want it, they don't deserve a polite response or help?  Hmmm...if this is any example of the team we have become, then it may be time to consider other things.

Dude, seriously, what is your malfunction? Are you on drugs or something?


 
No he is not, and you are being somewhat obnoxious.
 
Sometimes a process that you think to be incredibly easy just does not 'click' for someone else. 
There is no need to be snarky when clarifying something for someone, that is what these forums are here for.
It's your attitude that needs adjusting, not Texingas.
Do try being more civil and accommodating when dealing with others, you'll find it goes a long way.
 


 
 
  
                               
 
#359
leftygof
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1755
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/11/08 17:16:59
  • Location: Amarillo, TX
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 5
Re:GPU points/QRB discussion 2012/11/12 06:36:33 (permalink)
You can't talk to our pledges that way!
Only we can talk to our pledges that way!


#360
Page: << < ..1112131415.. > >> Showing page 12 of 28
Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile