So , they are now down to 35% retention and many users haven't even gotten their first electric bill.
As I've mentioned before...there is absolutely no leadership and no direction for the project.
Dr. Pande is MIA, working on his investments in cloud computing and managing a high stakes venture capital fund.
 
While you can get millions of people to try almost anything..(old enough to remember pet rocks), in order to retain, you have to show people they are actually achieving something.
 
The lack of communication and lack of leadership will continue to see the project tank.
 
It is just a fact. I know everyone here wishes otherwise, but unless you DEMAND change, we will just see the continuous repetition of history. 
 

Yes, there are always going to be a core of really dedicated people who will donate regardless.
My team has one guy that has donated 3.75 billion points on home servers (not gpu)
However, that level of dedication and persistence is the exception and not the rule.
 
I don't question if the donations are or will be useful.
 
I question how the project squanders the good will and initiative of people like Barnacules Nerdgasm.
 
I think the lack of stewardship borders on fraud.
 
But, you don't need to take my view as fact.
just watch the retention rate of this new team drop over the coming months and you will see what I mean.

Chris21010
their retention may have dropped to 35% but their PPD has only dropped to ~70% of their peak. this means that yes there were a TON of people that just did 1-10 units over a couple days and stopped but it also means that those who are actually doing real work are sticking around, at least for now.

Folding @ EVGA is no longer #1 in production because you keep moving back over to Curecoin
 chris21010

Chris21010
my 3mill ppd didn't make a difference the last 2 days, we still lost to them. so back to making CURE so i can get funds to donate to the timezone challenge, if they can accept btc that is.

Maybe not, but add your change and add 100 more and it makes a difference.
But I guess you are correct in the long run your score makes no real difference.
 

I'd hoped that they'd stick with it, every unit folded helps. I remember starting on a 8800gtx. Problem is most people logoff or turn their systems off when they're done. It's only the diehards that rock it overnight and 24/7 in some cases. Even I had to turn my system off at times due to heat and power bills from time to time.

Once the value of a bitcoin crashes again they will slow way down.

As a team we tend to have lower production toward the end of the month - it will spike again on Oct 1st and we'll be back ahead on the daily.  For the month of Sept we outproduced them by a good amount, but worth keeping an eye on as CureCoin's daily output is increasing

Curecoin (Avg PPD 237,961.60) is who is Killing us Not Barnacules Nerdgasm
 

yes, it is PPD per active user he charted.

Correct
 

Chris21010
yes, it is PPD per active user he charted.

http://folding.extremeove...ke.php?s=&t=224497

I want to know what their number one folder has for hardware with those kinds of number
 
PS3EdOlkkola  24 hr average = 29,795,940
 
 
   

No, I'm fairly certain has has rigs similar to Chris...only he just throws another one together every other month.
I can't find his post on FF, or Slack...but he has the money and time.
 
Just adds another 3 or 4 card system to his farm whenever he wants to increase his production.
 
dozen 980 TI, dozen 1070, dozen 1080 ...etc. etc.
 
Tied to his investment in the  coin infrastructure and getting others to join cure-coin, leveraging power of borge for other uses?
IDK.
 
I'm not sure PG is completely sure what they  (the curcoin groups) do with all that processing power. But since they don't have any clear proof or even report of nefarious activity....they have not stopped the coin mining groups from participating in the team points.
 
Found his list on FF:
ll Systems:
FAH v 7.4.4
Windows 7 updated weekly

System 1
CPU -> Intel i7 5930K @ 3.8 GHz
GPU -> Titan XP (Pascal) @1.45 GHz, GTX 1080 369.05
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->16 GB DDR4 @ XMP-3000, SSD INTEL SSDSA2CW120G
HFM ID -> i7-5930K Titan XP + 1080

System 2
CPU -> AMD FX-8350 @ 4.1 GHz
GPU -> R9-295x @1.020 GHz, 15.11
GPU -> R9 Fury X @ 1050 GHz, 15.11
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->32 GB DDR3 @ 2133, SSD SanDisk SDSSDHP256G
HFM ID -> FX-8350 R9295 + R9 Fury X

System 3
CPU -> Intel i7-3770 @ 3.8 GHz
GPU -> GTX 980ti, @ 1.425 GHz, 355.98
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->8 GB DDR3 @ XMP-1600 , SSD Crucial_CT256MX100SSD1
HFM ID -> i7-3770S 980ti

System 4
CPU -> Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz
GPU -> GTX 980ti (x3) @1.3 GHz, 355.98
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->16 GB DDR4-2133 , Samsung SSD 850 EVO
HFM ID -> TC E5-1620-v3 3x 980ti

System 5
CPU -> Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz
GPU -> Titan X (x3) @ 1.35 GHz, 355.98
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->16 GB DDR4-2133, SSD Corsair Neutron GTX SS
HFM ID -> TC E5-1620-v3 3x Titan X

System 6
CPU -> Intel i7-3770 @ 3.8 GHz
GPU -> GTX 1080 (x2) @ 1.9 GHz, 368.69
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->8 GB DDR3 @ XMP-1600, SSD Samsung 840
HFM ID -> TC i7-3770B 2x 1080

System 7
CPU -> Intel i7-3770K @ 3.8 GHz
GPU -> GTX 1080 (x2) @ 2.0 GHz, 368.69
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->8 GB DDR3 @ XMP-1600, SSD Samsung 840
HFM ID -> TC i7-3770K 2x 1080

System 8
CPU -> Intel Xeon e5-1620-v3 @ 3.8 GHz
GPU -> Titan X (x3) @ 1.35 GHz, 355.98
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->16 GB DDR3 @ XMP-1600, SSD Samsung 840
HFM ID -> TC i7-3770S 2x Titan X

System 9
CPU -> Intel Core i7-4771 CPU @ 3.50GHz
GPU -> R9 Fury X (x3) @ 1.050 GHz, 16.1
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->16 GB DDR3 @ XMP-2133, SSD INTEL SSDSC2CW120A3
HFM ID -> i7-4771K 3x R9 Fury X

System 10
CPU -> Intel Core i7-4790 CPU @ 4.0GHz
GPU -> R9 Fury x (x3) @ 1.050 GHz, 16.1
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->16 GB DDR3 @ XMP-1600, SSD Samsung 840
HFM ID -> i7-4790K 3x R9 Fury X

System 11
CPU -> Intel Core i7-4790 CPU @ 4.0GHz
GPU -> Titan X (x2) @ 1.35 GHz, 355.98
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->16 GB DDR3 @ XMP-1866, SSD Samsung 840 EVO
HFM ID -> i7-4790K 2x Titan X

System 12
CPU -> Intel Core i7 5930K @ 3.80GHz
GPU -> GTX 980ti (x3) @ 1.35 GHz, 355.98
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->32 GB DDR4 @ XMP-3000, SSD Samsung 850 EVO
HFM ID -> i7-5930K 3x 980ti

System 13
CPU -> Intel Core i7 5960X @ 3.80GHz
GPU -> GTX 1080 (x3) @ 1.9 GHz, 368.69
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->32 GB DDR4 @ XMP-3000, SSD Samsung 840 Pro
HFM ID -> i7-5960X 3x 1080

System 14
CPU -> Intel i7-3930K @ 3.5 GHz
GPU -> GTX 980ti Hybrid (x3) @ 1.400 GHz, 355.98
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->16 GB DDR3 @ XMP-1866, SSD Corsair Neutron
HFM ID -> TC i7-3930K 3x 980ti

System 15
CPU -> Intel i7-3930K @ 3.5 GHz
GPU -> GTX 980 OC (x3) @ 1.450 GHz, 355.98
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->16 GB DDR3 @ XMP-1866, SSD Samsung EVO
HFM ID -> i7-3930K 3x 980

System 16
CPU -> Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz
GPU -> Titan X (x3) @ 1.3 GHz, 355.98
OS -> Windows 7 x64
Other ->16 GB DDR4-2133, SSD Corsair Neutron GTX SS
HFM ID -> TC E5-1620-v3 2x Titan X

System 17
CPU -> Intel Phi - Knights Landing - 64 Cores/256 threads @ 1.3GHz
GPU -> None (yet!)
OS -> CentOS7 x64
Other ->96 GB DDR4-2133, Intel SSD/HTC 4GB
HFM ID -> Intel Phi

System 18
CPU -> Intel Centrino @ 1.7GHz
GPU -> Old Dell Laptop - SMP only
OS -> Windows 8
Other ->8 GB SODIM 1333MHz, Intel SSD
HFM ID -> Not listed

Last edit update: August 12, 2016
 
 
So, I count it as (3) 980, (10)980TI, (1)old Titan, (1) AMD 295, (7) FuryX, (8)1080, (12) TitanX, and one INTEL PHI Knights landing. and one laptop
 

Irregardless of what they're doing or why, our lead over them has jumped to 14.3 years.  It'd be interesting to see when their totals finally start to drop off a cliff though (right around the same time all those people folding for bucks fade away again?)

For the first time in a very long our Team has a listed Threat! and it is Curecoin
Shown here: http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/team_summary.php?s=&t=111065