My Cinebench frame rate is 58FPS. Apparently that's not in line with other Titan X owners:
 
"the other Titan X's out there are getting 210fps to 250fps so I am surprised that neither company will admit there is a problem. What are you using for your OS and your OS Drive? I know it makes a difference as my normal SSD got 155fps but when I put my OS on the M.2 SSD drive it jumped it up to 166fps. Have you run Heaven Benchmarks as they are more for the GPU and it may test much better for you. I would be so upset after spending that kind of money and get only 25% of its performance..."
 
I'm running out of ideas. This card is so slow that it cannot manage more than 3FPS in Sonic Scenarist's DVD preview window. It's a standard def MPEG2 playback! My old Core2Quad had no trouble playing the DVD preview in Scenarist with a mere GTX680.. even before the upgrade to a 680.. an 8800GTX was able to play it. But a dual Xeon can't play MPEG2 at more than a stuttery 3FPS?
 
I've run out of ideas.. tweaked everything I could in BIOS, Windows registry, etc., since June. Supermicro tech support has been looking into it and concludes it's an Adobe problem. But that doesn't explain why my old machine from 2007 outperforms this machine on Cinebench and in DVD scenario playback.
 

Supermicro X10DRi Dual Xeon motherboard
Two Intel E5-2630 v3 CPUs
128GB ECC RAM
Crucial 240GB SSD (boot drive)
Samsung 2TB SSD (1st video)
Samsung 2TB SSD (2nd video)
Muskin Reaktor 1TB SSD (3rd video)
Muskin Reaktor 1TB SSD (4th video)
EVGA Titan X 12GB
EVGA 1000W PSU
O/S: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit SP1

I just hit 202fps with a single titan @ stock clocks in cinebench.

MWHDVideo
Yes, Vsync is off. Should it be on?

Nope.

I put my GTX680 into the dual Xeon machine and it's score dropped from 78FPS in the machine it came out of, to 59.15FPS in the dual Xeon.

Dropping the Titan X into my old Core2Quad, I ran Cinebench and got 78.24FPS, better than it did on the dual Xeon.
 
I'm stumped. I've tried all of the available X16 slots in the dual Xeon and can't break the 59FPS barrier.
Neither GTX680 nor Titan X does any better or worse. They produce identical scores.

Windows 7 64 bit? I don't have much else on there.. just Adobe Premiere, Maya, Scenarist and the Windows OS. And it got this lousey score consistently through out the build, and didn't change as I added more applications.

I realize Creative Cloud Desktop has issues (to say nothing of the $50/month it costs), but I have to edit XAVC-I and I've been working with Premiere for some 15+ years and know my way around it. I've tried DaVinci, but without their hardware, it is impossible to get a 2nd monitor full screen video.
 
The setup works decently, but I don't feel that we're getting all we should out of it.

The X10DRi motherboard cost me just shy of $500.
If nothing else, I can say that it is a very STABLE system. Applications aren't crashing now and then like they do on my old overclocked system. But it has unique quirks, one of them being the low CB OGL score, the other being startup lag with playback in Premiere. And more minor, but annoying because it messes up all my app setups that use multiple monitors: the tendency for the system to randomly select which monitor is "primary" at boot time. It's like playing roulette ever time I boot up. Lately, I just leave the machine running 24/7. Less headaches. And less waiting. The X10DRi takes an eternity to POST.