Tropickz
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 735
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/10/28 00:48:15
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49165
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: online
- Ribbons : 199
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/20 20:06:41
(permalink)
Love how the chips just keep getting more expensive.
|
ssj92
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1417
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/09/18 20:56:56
- Location: East Bay, California
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 6
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/20 20:27:34
(permalink)
Wow $1,350 now? I'll pass, should have gotten a Titan-Z at $1,499 lol.
Alienware Area-51M Laptop: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.3Ghz | nVidia GeForce RTX 2080Alienware Aurora R4 Desktop: Intel Core i9 10980XE | nVidia Titan VAlienware M18xR2 Laptop: Intel Core i7 3920XM @ 4.7Ghz | nVidia Quadro RTX 3000Alienware X14 Laptop: Intel Core i7 12700H | nVidia GeForce RTX 3060
|
mistermister
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5804
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/03/29 02:38:09
- Location: San Diego
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 13
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/20 21:50:25
(permalink)
Almost $1400 and only 6GB of memory? lol.
AMD 3700x / X-570 Aorus Ultra / RTX-3090 FTW3
|
seta8967
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1813
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/03/03 05:18:45
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/20 23:29:28
(permalink)
Someone needs to wake up Nvidia and their misconception that people have 1400 bucks for a gpu.
|
megalolman
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 403
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/06/15 07:38:41
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/21 00:19:03
(permalink)
seta8967
Someone needs to wake up Nvidia and their misconception that people have 1400 bucks for a gpu.
If they put a price tag of 1400$, is because they will sell them as hot cakes because that happened in the past. They don't make a new graphics card to lost money.
Succubi-Lair(Main Rig, dual-system) : Processor: AMD Ryzen 3900x @ NZXT Kraken x62 Motherboard: Gigabyte Elite X570, Memory: 32GB GSkill TridentZ 3200Mhz C14, Storage: Samsung EVO 960 M.2 NVME 250GB (Windows10 PRO), 2 x Samsung EVO 970 plus M.2 NVME 1TB (2TB Raid 0 array - Games), Graphics: MSI GTX1080 Ti X @ NZXT Kraken x42, Audio: ASUS Xonar DX, PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower Grand RGB 850W, Case: Phanteks Enthoo Evolv X, Second-System (Envy, Ruoting/WIFI AP): Gigabyte GA-J1900N_D3V, 8GB SO_DIMM 1600MHZ DDR3, 120x2 SSD Raid 0, 150W picoPSU @ Phanteks Enthoo Evolv X ITX tray
|
Vlada011
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 10257
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/03/25 00:14:05
- Location: Belgrade-Serbia
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 11
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/21 00:27:22
(permalink)
1350$ no way to pay. I simply no way to pay over 900e for card and must be custom. That's insane. We must to prey to AMD launch something good and drop that price on 900-1000e. 1350e is not even option to think about that. Even if they launch GTX580 Classified + GTX780Ti K|NGP|N + GTX980 K|NGP|N in one card. That's sick price for graphic chip with price 50-90$ I would rather call ASUS office and tell them to fix price of R9-295X in Belgrade and NVIDIA could not launch stronger than that, and price of R9-295X is 800-850e. At least they have 1-2 in office to sell for price as in Europe. NVIDIA really don't have mercy, they will done same as for Titan, only probably give option for custom card and price will be 1300-1500$ We can't lose performance anymore because NVIDIA sick price. Obvious NVIDIA force people who payed 500-700e for premium cards on consoles or AMD. GTX970 when I look page over net I feel sick from problems. I think today to dig two good 970 for SLI, without problems, black screen, display port problems, low GPU usage, low memory usage, stable,... is like you search golden sample for overclocking. My hope to play on Big Maxwell just die.  And probably hopes of many many normal people. We will use GK110 up to 20nm or Radeon if need performance, because 3GB is too low. AMD could make even better than GM200 they can't ask more than 700-750$. They simply can't because they will sell 100 cards than.
post edited by Vlada011 - 2015/01/21 00:59:29
|
Fennicillin
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 391
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/12/07 19:44:52
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/21 04:05:31
(permalink)
I hope that msrp rumor is just a rumor. Nvidia would be shooting themselves in the foot.
|
HAZMAN_THE_GREAT
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 4805
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/12/01 04:40:46
- Location: Planet Earth
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 7
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/21 05:11:50
(permalink)
Sajin
Love how the chips just keep getting more expensive.
Yeah and there are going to be a bunch of morons going to buy it for that much too if that is the "actual price". Like its been said before vote with your wallet and prices will drop. But your going to have some dummies just buying it for bragging rights. Well you can blame inflation for price increases as well.
|
seta8967
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1813
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/03/03 05:18:45
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/21 05:22:29
(permalink)
HAZMAN_THE_GREAT
Sajin
Love how the chips just keep getting more expensive.
Yeah and there are going to be a bunch of morons going to buy it for that much too if that is the "actual price". Like its been said before vote with your wallet and prices will drop. But your going to have some dummies just buying it for bragging rights. Well you can blame inflation for price increases as well.
I will be severely disappointed if they don't release a 980ti that is 700ish dollars.
|
ssj92
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1417
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/09/18 20:56:56
- Location: East Bay, California
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 6
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/21 08:14:19
(permalink)
seta8967
HAZMAN_THE_GREAT
Sajin
Love how the chips just keep getting more expensive.
Yeah and there are going to be a bunch of morons going to buy it for that much too if that is the "actual price". Like its been said before vote with your wallet and prices will drop. But your going to have some dummies just buying it for bragging rights. Well you can blame inflation for price increases as well.
I will be severely disappointed if they don't release a 980ti that is 700ish dollars.
They will have to if AMD releases something competitive.
Alienware Area-51M Laptop: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.3Ghz | nVidia GeForce RTX 2080Alienware Aurora R4 Desktop: Intel Core i9 10980XE | nVidia Titan VAlienware M18xR2 Laptop: Intel Core i7 3920XM @ 4.7Ghz | nVidia Quadro RTX 3000Alienware X14 Laptop: Intel Core i7 12700H | nVidia GeForce RTX 3060
|
hallowen
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5644
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/06/18 15:38:00
- Location: In a Galaxy Far, Far Away...
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 14
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/21 09:08:16
(permalink)
Tropickz
With the GTX 960 soon to be released in next 48hrs.. Details about the new titan X are starting to surface.
Here is some unconfirmed specs so far..
MSRP - $1350 
VRAM - 6Gb (12Gb later)
GM200 Chip
384-bit memory bus
2560-3072 CUDA cores
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/43007/nvidia-rumored-release-geforce-gtx-titan-1350-6gb-vram/index.html
In other words, That would personally cost almost $5500 for a 4-Way SLI Setup, Not even including the price of Water Blocks?  Holy Mother of God, I Only THOUGHT I was Crazy in the past paying the High costs of my other 4-Way setups, But I was WRONG, wasn't I!  It's getting to the point where it probably would make more sense to go out and buy a second car instead.
ASUS: Rampage VI Extreme | i9-7940X | 2X RTX 2080 Ti Kingpin SLI | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz Memory - SAGER: NP9870-G | i7-6700K | GTX 980M 8GB | 64GB DDR4 | 950 PRO M.2 512GB | 17.3 QHD 120Hz Matte G-Sync | Prema bios - EVOC Premamod: P870TM1 | i9-9900K-LM | RTX 2080N 8GB | Modded Vapor Chamber | 32GB 3000MHz Ripjaws | 960 EVO M.2 1TB | 17.3 3K QHD 120Hz Matte G-Sync | Intel 8265 -
|
lehpron
Regular Guy
- Total Posts : 16254
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/05/18 15:22:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 191
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/21 09:25:58
(permalink)
My 2 cents: I think you guys have it coming. If anyone wants to speak with their wallet, you need to stop supporting the company, not the product; otherwise your complaints come off as a bluff since the brand will have your money later anyway. None of you are ditching your "favorite brands" over this, you're not angry enough at them and still too loyal. It's pathetic; if you want to be angry at nVidia you need to prove it by ditching EVGA, but you won't, thus I don't take any complaints about prices seriously.
The price of factory-overclocked GTX980 has been steadily rising in retail, I find cards going up to $800 and they barely have a 15% increase in base clock, but a 30% increase in price tag over vanilla-- and a lot of you guys just apologize for it. Yet, $1400 for 50% more performance is unreasonable? Get the hell out of here, you're lucky it isn't another $3000 card since, again, there is no competition!
|
zildjian75
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1261
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2007/04/03 16:47:53
- Location: Chas, SC
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/21 09:38:10
(permalink)
WOW!!! Just WOW!! That makes my 2 x 980 SC's at $569 look like a steal of a deal!!!
"The wise know their weakness too well to assume infallibility; and he who knows most, knows best how little he knows." Thomas Jefferson RIG#1 (Home) - i7 4790k @ 4.4ghz w/ CM V8 GTS - EVGA Z97 Classified - Win10 64bit - Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB (2x8GB) @ 2133mhz - 2 x EVGA GTX 980SC in SLI - Corsair AX850 - 250GB Samsung Evo (main) - 500GB Samsung Evo (games) - 1TB WD Black (misc) - Aerocool Strike-X (Cheesy... But effective!)
|
Vlada011
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 10257
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/03/25 00:14:05
- Location: Belgrade-Serbia
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 11
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/21 09:41:07
(permalink)
You are right If price is 1300 after 2-3 months I can buy for 1000-1050 or maybe even 950, tested samples or something like that. No buyers for such hardware in my town... Same was with Titan Black, they offer me for 800e, price was 1050. But I'm not sure is it possible BIOS from one reference model to flash with other brand if model is same, clock same. Example GIGABYTE or MSI, ASUS TITAN with EVGA TITAN Superclocked or you need to rewrite numbers from BIOS with BIOS Tweaker.
post edited by Vlada011 - 2015/01/21 09:44:52
|
Vlada011
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 10257
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/03/25 00:14:05
- Location: Belgrade-Serbia
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 11
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/22 05:08:45
(permalink)
GTX980 have 2048 CUDA and work better than GTX780Ti with 2880 CUDA, about 10-15% difference most presented as bigger fps in games.
News talk about 3072 CUDA in NVIDIA GM200. Depend of optimization card could be 40-55% stronger than Titan Black with 6 and 12GB memory. That's not bad at all. 1/3 stronger than GTX980, about 35%.
Damn, that would be graphic from hell.
|
lehpron
Regular Guy
- Total Posts : 16254
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/05/18 15:22:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 191
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/22 11:14:20
(permalink)
Vlada011
GTX980 have 2048 CUDA and work better than GTX780Ti with 2880 CUDA, about 10-15% difference most presented as bigger fps in games. When I find reviews that include both GTX980 and GTX770 (since they share the same memory bandwidth with 256=bit at 7GHz) and scale performance with clock ratios, I calculate a 14.8% IPC difference from Kepler and Maxwell. I think like Intel, nVidia compensates by just increase the core count and clock to make it seem faster, plus using less VRAM chips in GTX980 made is cheaper and use less power. Therefore, if a Maxwell GPU had the extra same specs as GTX Titan Black, it would be just 17% faster; but raising the core count to 3072 would add another 6.6%, and raising the GPU clocks from 889/980 to 1100/1390 would add 24% on base and 40% on boost. But rumors claim the Vram for the GM200 card is at 6GHz and not 7GHz, and the difference was 10% comparing GTX770 with GTX680, so that could go against Titan-X. So adding up the predicted percentages of base clock + core + arch = 14.8 + 6.6 + 24 -10 = 35.4% faster than Titan Black w/o boost. I think people assume 50% more cores means 50% faster-- not that simple.
|
Tropickz
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 735
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/10/28 00:48:15
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/22 11:37:27
(permalink)
|
Vlada011
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 10257
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/03/25 00:14:05
- Location: Belgrade-Serbia
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 11
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/22 17:58:37
(permalink)
AMD say they will launch something very good in Q2 2015, NVIDIA hurry to take money before them. But I doubt they have something good, they not sound confident. That card in best case can drop price of Titan X or force NVIDIA to launch same strictly for gamers for cheaper price. Even delay of Radeon could not surprise me. Really bad. I expect to AMD launch monster for 700e and force NVIDIA to offer enough video memory and strong card to compensate High Bandwith Memory lack for 800-900$. NVIDIA had card on beginning of winter, I believe, ready for production, 100%. They only wait information from AMD.
post edited by Vlada011 - 2015/01/22 18:02:27
|
tamvegas
New Member
- Total Posts : 62
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/11/20 13:57:09
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/25 01:58:34
(permalink)
Tropickz I hope that article is right on the Titan Z release!
Bought 2 980sc's 3 weeks ago to go 4K and I hit the 4gig vram limit hard on several games. Using them now for the other 2 monitors (2k Qnix) and a Titan Black on the 4K. It hits the full 6 gigs vram occasionally, but with the G-Sync works very well even down to 30 fps.
My step up runs till April 4th, so I'm hoping that Titan Z comes in time to give me a good discount on the price. Looks like there's a 50-50 chance for it.
ASRock Fatality X99 Motherboard | Haswell 5930 cpu | 4 - 8 gig sticks of G Skill 2666 DDR4 memory | Swiftech 240x cpu Cooler | 2 - EVGA gtx 1080 FTW | Samsung evo 850 500 gig ssd | Samsung evo 840 240 gig ssd | Samsung evo 840 500 gig ssd | Asus Xonar DX2 Pcie Sound card Evga 1200 P2 PSU | Corsair White 780T caseTwin Acer CB280HK 4K Monitors | Acer 28 inch G-Sync XB280HK 4K Monitor | 2 x Rosewill Dual 27" Monitor Stand
|
Baltothewolf
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 3762
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/03/23 23:27:34
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 5
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/25 06:25:06
(permalink)
lehpron
My 2 cents: I think you guys have it coming. If anyone wants to speak with their wallet, you need to stop supporting the company, not the product; otherwise your complaints come off as a bluff since the brand will have your money later anyway. None of you are ditching your "favorite brands" over this, you're not angry enough at them and still too loyal. It's pathetic; if you want to be angry at nVidia you need to prove it by ditching EVGA, but you won't, thus I don't take any complaints about prices seriously.
The price of factory-overclocked GTX980 has been steadily rising in retail, I find cards going up to $800 and they barely have a 15% increase in base clock, but a 30% increase in price tag over vanilla-- and a lot of you guys just apologize for it. Yet, $1400 for 50% more performance is unreasonable? Get the hell out of here, you're lucky it isn't another $3000 card since, again, there is no competition!
Isn't it so true? I spoke with my wallet personally and got a 290x. I'll bet half the people on this thread that are complaining about the price are going to buy at least one.
My Laptop (GE63VR-7RF): - 7700HQ. - 16GB RAM. - GTX 1070. - 128GB SSD.- 1X 1TB 7200 spinny drive. 
|
cisco0623
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1254
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/04/03 13:42:07
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/25 09:40:15
(permalink)
Damn, I plunked the $ down a few years back and it paid off because having the 6gb ram is whats keeping the Titans humming fine, but man are they pushing it. For years the top card was ~$500, its increased seriously since lol 35% increase in price since the last gen? I guess it's 1% increase = $1? lol
|
lehpron
Regular Guy
- Total Posts : 16254
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/05/18 15:22:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 191
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/25 11:10:46
(permalink)
Baltothewolf
Isn't it so true? I spoke with my wallet personally and got a 290x. Good man, smart move. Though, I'll admit, I don't know what price R9-380X will debut at, which is the beautiful catch in all of this that many nVidia fans will complain about. It certainly won't be a $1,000 card despite the probability of matching GTX Titan-X (doubling the memory bandwidth means all of the 45% extra stream processors from Hawaii will scale their highest, and a bit more if the GPU was held back with just a 50% increase in bandwidth). It might retain the same $499 spot as R9-290X did since it uses the flagship GPU despite being marketed with an upper midrange model name. I highly doubt R9-380X will retake the $299 price of R9-280X because there isn't a R9-390X on any roadmap this year at 28nm; though it would just destroy nVidia. I'm sure they are waiting for the next nodal shrink for a 390X, unless they go straight onto 490X. Anyway, a $500 price for an equivalent to GM200 will affect the price of GTX970/980, nVidia will be forced to drop those prices and debut a faster product. I could see a GM200 product debuting at $700 where nVidia tries to push performance per Watt marketing, GTX980 could drop to $400, GTX970 could drop to $250, and GTX960 could drop to $150-- all by this summer. It is possible that AMD would rebrand R9-290/290X as cheaper R9-300 cards until they can use another node, all while Carrizo comes up from the bottom of the stack closing in on GTX750/750 Ti (which a lowering GTX960 also dips into), so GM107 will have to drop in price. But AMD could still push for more than $500 for a R9-380X. Baltothewolf
I'll bet half the people on this thread that are complaining about the price are going to buy at least one. I'm waiting for the jewel of the circumstance: The morons that claim to be victims of competition when prices drop or new/cheaper debuts after they couldn't wait for what impact AMD could have on nVidia. The stage is set, Fiji-XT and GM200 are within months of each other; if anyone complains wants to be taken seriously, they better choose Fiji or a rebranded Hawaii, otherwise they are just full of it.
post edited by lehpron - 2015/01/25 22:34:01
|
seta8967
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1813
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/03/03 05:18:45
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/25 18:44:38
(permalink)
I wish I could test the 380x out, but I find it weird that there is no 390x. If they wait for 20nm and release it wouldn't that be a new architecture, so would have 3 designs for 1 card series, hawaii, fiji, and the 20nm? Right now I'm still leaning to hoping a 980 with increased VRAM comes out. I really like the low power consumption and 3 or 4 980s would suffice my needs, if not than a 980ti it will be. Just another 300w card from AMD would be killer on elecricity almost 900-1200w for gpu's alone, compared to 980's 165, I could almost run 2 980's for cost of 1 380x.
|
Vlada011
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 10257
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/03/25 00:14:05
- Location: Belgrade-Serbia
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 11
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/25 20:04:51
(permalink)
Radeon graphic card interest me only because I would like to see drop price of GeForce GM200. Nothing else.
I would like 5-10% weaker card than NVIDIA. Than NVIDIA can't ask more than 200$ above them and we know AMD can't sell nothing above 700$. Mining mania is finished, their dual card cost 900$ 40-50% stronger than GM200. No way to AMD ask more than 700$.
They can ask but they will not get from their customers, only if some NVIDIA customers accept Radeon because normal price, from people who are AMD fans they can't ask more than 600-700$ even for stronger card than GM200.
|
Tropickz
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 735
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/10/28 00:48:15
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/25 20:51:45
(permalink)
seta8967
I wish I could test the 380x out, but I find it weird that there is no 390x. If they wait for 20nm and release it wouldn't that be a new architecture, so would have 3 designs for 1 card series, hawaii, fiji, and the 20nm? Right now I'm still leaning to hoping a 980 with increased VRAM comes out. I really like the low power consumption and 3 or 4 980s would suffice my needs, if not than a 980ti it will be. Just another 300w card from AMD would be killer on elecricity almost 900-1200w for gpu's alone, compared to 980's 165, I could almost run 2 980's for cost of 1 380x.
Vlada011
Radeon graphic card interest me only because I would like to see drop price of GeForce GM200. Nothing else.
I would like 5-10% weaker card than NVIDIA. Than NVIDIA can't ask more than 200$ above them and we know AMD can't sell nothing above 700$. Mining mania is finished, their dual card cost 900$ 40-50% stronger than GM200. No way to AMD ask more than 700$.
They can ask but they will not get from their customers, only if some NVIDIA customers accept Radeon because normal price, from people who are AMD fans they can't ask more than 600-700$ even for stronger card than GM200.
380x rumored http://videocardz.com/54727/amd-radeon-r9-300-series-rumors
|
Vlada011
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 10257
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/03/25 00:14:05
- Location: Belgrade-Serbia
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 11
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/26 02:04:17
(permalink)
Many rumors.
I understand that NVIDIA is expensive but they are good, and reading history of company and employers you must be fascinate with their work and how they become leader in design and production graphic processors. Only is bad because highes class of GeForce suddenly become more expensive than previous years and not affordable for most people.
Because of that many people prey to AMD launch something good and force them to drop price and than we can enjoy in unlock GM200.
That would be really excellent moments.
|
Johnny 5
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 116
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/05/19 21:06:31
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/01/26 17:38:46
(permalink)
Next GPU upgrade for me will maybe be around mid 2016 and I'll likely get two of whatever the highest end crunching/gaming single GPU SC cards with heat exhausting coolers EVGA can sell me, up to... maybe $1500 (USD) each, but we'll see. Needs to be a significant enough upgrade to the two SC Titan Blacks I'm using now, else I'll just go for some other upgrades, maybe motherboard, CPU, and RAM, and/or display.
Still good to keep any eye on what's coming out. Thanks.
OS: Windows 7 Professional SP1 64bit, Debian GNU/Linux 64bit (virtual machine on a RAM drive) | CPU: Intel i7-3930K @ 4.2GHz | Motherboard: ASUS P9X79 WS | RAM: Corsair Dominator 64GB Quad Channel DDR3 @ 1600MHz (8×8GB DIMMS) | Graphics: EVGA GeForce GTX Titan Black Superclocked @ 1124MHz (×2, SLI) | Power: Corsair AX1200 (1200W, 100.4A @ 12V) | Case: Corsair Obsidian 750D | Cooling: Corsair H110, NOCTUA NF-A14 industrialPPC-3000 PWM (×5) | Storage: Samsung 840 EVO 1TB SATA III SSD (system drive), Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA III HDD (media, backups), Western Digital My Passport 2TB USB 3.0 External HDD (backups) | Optical: Sony Optiarc Internal 12x Blu-ray Burner BD-5300S-03 (×2) | Display: Sony Bravia 46" 1920×1080 
|
Xavier Zepherious
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 6746
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/07/04 12:53:39
- Location: Medicine Hat ,Alberta, Canada
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 16
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/02/20 17:31:06
(permalink)
|
Gold Leader
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 3939
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/05/30 03:06:17
- Location: Dirksland, The Netherlands
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 62
Re: Rumored GTX Titan X
2015/02/21 01:05:12
(permalink)
Baltothewolf
Isn't it so true? I spoke with my wallet personally and got a 290x.
I'll bet half the people on this thread that are complaining about the price are going to buy at least one.
Well it really depends what your preferences are :) If CUDA is really of need for your work or Crunching or anything a;long side that or you seek a a card that can act as a GM200 based Quadro but only costs a quarter of a GM200 based Quadro then the Titan X is not a bad idea, really it can be a good alternative, you can use it as a GeForce for your games but you can use it for CAD as well, so as that goes it's not a bad idea, even that the price is bloody retarded, it's still a lot less and what a GM200 based Quadro would be. But if you are more of an OpenCL type of person the R9 390X is the GPU to get, it also has Mantle an API NV boards Lack, it will also do well in Cad if yer gonna do OpenCL or similar things. But main thing is what are you looking from your VGA card if it's just games GTX 980/ GTX 780 Ti or R9 290X / R9 390 [Thx to much cheaper price/performance than any GeForce compared to it] these would be the best choices. But if you seek a more professional Approach the TitanZ, Titan Black or this new Titan X Might be the more interesting appeal, even tho the R9 390X will still be very competitive same as the R9 295X2 if it's gonna be Mantle & OpenCL Based so yer there ya go.
|