http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/samsungs-se790c-monitor-curves-days/#/2
 

 
http://www.samsung.com/le...monitor/LS34E790CNS/ZN
 

 
It's so good monitor and elegant. 
Dell prepare something similar too and I think this best shape for gaming.
 
 
 

It's only 1440 pixels high unfortunately.  My next monitor/TV is going to be 2160 pixels high.  Now if they had a 21:9 version in 2160 (5040x2160), I would be drooling right now.

I bet that stand has no adjustment just like their current 4K display which looks eerily similar. Style does not come before functionality... boo Samsung, you should know better.

I like the trend of this 21:9 format for PC gaming, but should I get an XB1 at some point, I am concerned about the screen stretching or cropping.  That being said, I haven't made up my mind.
 

Scarlet-TechI will wait for GPUs that can drive it

You do realize this is a myth?  There are two ways of looking at this:

1. By the time the hardware comes, you would have moved onto another game that has higher hardware requirements, forcing you to wait longer and/or just complain about it.  You might as well just stop getting new games to ensure upcoming GPUs will drive whatever resolution, since modern games need more than just one modern high-end GPU at such high resolutions.  
2. Just about any game from at least 6 years or older will run MDS (max detail smooth) on integrated video, or the equivalent dedicated card from back in the day whether it's a GTX280 or HD4870-- but an enthusiast or anyone keeping up with tech will not wait that long.  You will not wait for GPUs that can drive a 2160p resolution.

lehpron
I like the trend of this 21:9 format for PC gaming, but should I get an XB1 at some point, I am concerned about the screen stretching or cropping.  That being said, I haven't made up my mind.
 

Scarlet-TechI will wait for GPUs that can drive it

You do realize this is a myth?  There are two ways of looking at this:

1. By the time the hardware comes, you would have moved onto another game that has higher hardware requirements, forcing you to wait longer and/or just complain about it.  You might as well just stop getting new games to ensure upcoming GPUs will drive whatever resolution, since modern games need more than just one modern high-end GPU at such high resolutions.  
2. Just about any game from at least 6 years or older will run MDS (max detail smooth) on integrated video, or the equivalent dedicated card from back in the day whether it's a GTX280 or HD4870-- but an enthusiast or anyone keeping up with tech will not wait that long.  You will not wait for GPUs that can drive a 2160p resolution.

I am at the point in this forum, to where I am going to just ignore posts like this. Yes, I understand. No, I don't ported games like far cry 4, and such, all that often.

The 980ti / Titan II series may be better, or whatever come next. Basically, this is a double wide monitor, and if video cards have a struggle pushing 4 K so glad monitor, then this would be silly to buy as a 4k gaming monitor, but would make sense for photo and video editing. That is all. The conversations of constantly nay saying everyone that mentions wanting video card to push 4k is getting old and drawn out. I will upgrade before then but I won't waste money on 4k monitors u til they are the price of 1080p monitors. Then they will make sense.

MonnieRock
Scarlet-Tech,
 
I am curious, which games do you play that you are having difficulties keeps 60FPS with your setup of  I7-5960x @ 4.4ghz &  3x 780Ti Classifieds listed in your rig?
Which monitor and resolution are you using currently to play games?
 
Thank you,
Monnie

No games have that issue.  That is why I wouldn't go to 4k, which 780ti's don't have the VRam from. Currently, I have 2 1080p 60hz monitors, and waiting for GSync 1440p monitors to come down in price. No point in paying double for anything.  Nothing is worth double the MSRP.

I would love for ultra wide (21:9) to replace the current 16:9 monitors. 
 

I will be going from 23 in to 34.  I am very excited about the current models coming out.

Looks like market start to offer Curved Monitors with AMD Free Sync Technology...
 
LG To Introduce World's First 21:9 Gaming Monitor With AMD FreeSync At CES 2015
 
http://www.techpowerup.com/208453/lg-to-introduce-worlds-first-21-9-gaming-monitor-with-amd-freesync-at-ces-2015.html
 
But we still can't get G-Sync under 300$, I mean G-Sync kit is not available at all or you need to destroy warranty on monitor if you want to install. From other side they force us on specific monitors with G-Sync and our choose will be very limited.
I can't wait review to people compare Free Sync with G-Sync...
Everything looks like NVIDIA made several bad moves and offers for their customers.
What if Free Sync work same as G-Sync what will NVIDIA to do than.  
I'm glad because I didn't need monitor and didn't pay ROG 27"
because look bad compared to Curved 34" monitors from Samsung and Dell.
NVIDIA become choice of rich people more and more...
I love NVIDIA but I will not payed crippled models only because that's NVIDIA card if AMD offer much stronger full unlocked for same money.
You see ROG Swift monitor how much cost only because G-Sync, and first price was much lower.
Their decision to force us on specific models even if we have better and cheaper choice only because G-Sync is doomed and small number of people will done something like that if review recognize similarity between Free Sync and G-Sync.
 
 
 

Wantwantwant... WHY IS THIS NOT FOR SALE YET?

Vlada011
If NVIDIA allow and we can use LG monitor and enjoy in Free Sync.
But NVIDIA had other plans, we need to pay 1200$ for ROG SWIFT with G-Sync.
I will pay but in second life. NVIDIA, NVIDIA, your throne is shaking... 
I even hear news that NVIDIA will not launched Tesla/Quadro in Maxwell architecture at all.
It's good because I bought GK110 only is not good because no enough memory to hold until Pascal.
Volta in 2017/2018. Even I hear no Stacked RAM with NVIDIA before Pascal.
In the beginning of 2013 you laugh to AMD with G-Sync and Titan... but now AMD will be lag free before us, without paying anything,
LAG FREE/STUTTER FREE FOR FREE   and with Stacked RAM.
And NVIDIA will be behind, same as GDDR3 vs GDDR5 with worse drivers ever and coil whine, black screen and 300$ worth G-Sync kit.
 
I hear one crazy NVIDIA fan boy say for LG monitor "That's not true, that's AMD marketing"...xexe. With army of such customers NVIDIA could do what they want and that's not good for customers who want to pay real price for real improvements.

Competition is good, but AMD needs to produce this time. Lets see what Free Sync can bring to the table. I know it's nice to dream, but the question with AMD is when? How long is it going to take Free Sync and Mantle to be widely used and will it be enough at that time? AMD still needs to make better and more efficient GPUs to make it worth it, but I'm glad their still trying. 

The Samsung monitor is 3440x1440, not 1080. Also, a 21:9 4k/5k monitor would be too niche to make. The extra pixels on a standard 16:9 4k monitor is already too much for 99% of the systems out there, adding an additional 33% on top of that would cripple almost any system trying to run a recent game in maxed out settings. IMO AOC, Samsung, LG and Dell are smart for going with WQHD resolutions.

mistermister
The Samsung monitor is 3440x1440, not 1080. Also, a 21:9 4k/5k monitor would be too niche to make. The extra pixels on a standard 16:9 4k monitor is already too much for 99% of the systems out there, adding an additional 33% on top of that would cripple almost any system trying to run a recent game in maxed out settings. IMO AOC, Samsung, LG and Dell are smart for going with WQHD resolutions.

The thing is though, Dell and Apple already have a 5K (5120 x 2880) available.  So a 5K 21:9 version (5040x2160) isn't out of the picture since they are making displays with that amount of pixels wide.  Granted they are still super expensive, just like 4K, but given time they will come down in price like always.
 
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/dell-ultrasharp-27-5k-monitor,28026.html
http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&cs=04&l=en&sku=UP275K3
http://www.apple.com/imac-with-retina/

Scarlet-Tech
I am at the point in this forum, to where I am going to just ignore posts like this. Yes, I understand. No, I don't ported games like far cry 4, and such, all that often.

+1 - This is why I don't post here much any more.  Every time I voice my opinion on maximizing my own personal gaming experience I don't need to be told that I'm a moron (in what I imagine to be the geekiest and most condescending voice possible).  "You do realize..."  Please.  
 
And yes, GPUs that comfortably drive 2160p resolutions are coming.  This is all about consumer demand, and while that doesn't necessarily exist at levels that make capable GPUs viable to produce yet, it almost certainly will.  We're in the very early stages of 4K adaption - just like we were once in the very early stages of the HD revolution.  Not sure anyone has to worry any more about whether their new GPU will be up to the task for HD, but they once were. 

mistermister
Wantwantwant... WHY IS THIS NOT FOR SALE YET?

Because most electronics are launched at CES. Wait a few days and hope it's not a paper launch.