EVGA

Auto vs Manual Transmisions

Page: << < ..67 > Showing page 6 of 7
Author
kaninja
Omnipotent Enthusiast
  • Total Posts : 8755
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/10/10 23:51:13
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 25
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/13 12:59:49 (permalink)
I'm jealous....my 1997 Exploder uses more gas in 10 than either of you do in an hour.

Corsair 650D   -  i5 3570K @ 4.6GHz  -  Corsair H80i  -  MSI Z77 M-Power  -  16GB DDR3 Corsair Dominator Platinum
WD 1TB Caviar Black x2  -  OCZ 120GB Vertex2 SSD  -  Corsair HX620  -  GTX285 SSC  -  Samsung T240  -  DIR-655
 


Baltothewolf
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3762
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/03/23 23:27:34
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 5
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/13 14:26:32 (permalink)
kaninja
I'm jealous....my 1997 Exploder uses more gas in 10 than either of you do in an hour.

But you get comfort, and luxury. My insight seats are some of the most uncomfortable seats I have ever sat on. Now if I swap in s2k seats and steering wheel the ride is MUCH better, but the seats cost 600$ and the steering wheel is 200 lol. If my Mustang was still running I would drive that around town, and use the insight for down the hill trips, but alas, it doesn't run.

My Laptop (GE63VR-7RF):
-7700HQ.
-16GB RAM.
-GTX 1070.
-128GB SSD.
-1X 1TB 7200 spinny drive.

-ZS-Carpenter
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1547
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/03/07 15:08:55
  • Location: My Affiliate Code: 6VBFZ0I9GZ
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 2
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/13 15:26:28 (permalink)
Baltothewolf
 If my Mustang was still running.....



never heard that one before
 
Baltothewolf
kaninja
I'm jealous....my 1997 Exploder uses more gas in 10 than either of you do in an hour.

But you get comfort, and luxury. My insight seats are some of the most uncomfortable seats I have ever sat on. Now if I swap in s2k seats and steering wheel the ride is MUCH better, but the seats cost 600$ and the steering wheel is 200 lol.



I have found that most small gas sippers have horrid seats. idk if it is for weight savings(super light foam??) or just cost savings but imo they would sell more if you could be comfortable in them.
 

 
 
 
Main rig: gaming/folding
Z68 FTW 2600k@4.2  980 Ti sc+
Dedicated folders
x79 Classy/4820k 3x 970
Q9550/780i 2x 770
kaninja
Omnipotent Enthusiast
  • Total Posts : 8755
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/10/10 23:51:13
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 25
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/13 15:42:34 (permalink)
Baltothewolf

But you get comfort, and luxury. My insight seats are some of the most uncomfortable seats I have ever sat on. Now if I swap in s2k seats and steering wheel the ride is MUCH better, but the seats cost 600$ and the steering wheel is 200 lol. If my Mustang was still running I would drive that around town, and use the insight for down the hill trips, but alas, it doesn't run.



Ha ha, true I do have nice pillowy electric leather seats with 8 way adjustability, but sometimes I would trade a bit of comfort away when I see these little gas sippers pull up at the station a few minutes after I have started pumping gas, fill their cars and drive away while I am still there trying to fill my swimming pool sized tank.

Corsair 650D   -  i5 3570K @ 4.6GHz  -  Corsair H80i  -  MSI Z77 M-Power  -  16GB DDR3 Corsair Dominator Platinum
WD 1TB Caviar Black x2  -  OCZ 120GB Vertex2 SSD  -  Corsair HX620  -  GTX285 SSC  -  Samsung T240  -  DIR-655
 


_Nite_
Insert Custom Title Here
  • Total Posts : 19175
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/04/18 15:35:04
  • Location: Sumner, Washington
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 46
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/13 16:34:03 (permalink)
Automatic is only good for banging around town in a standard car
 
Manual is needed for racing, offroading, and pulling heavy loads.

Gaming Rig: AMD Ryzen 7 2700x @ 4.25Ghz - Asrock B450 Pro 4 - 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4 3000 - 240GB SSD (OS), 1TB ADATA SU800 SSD and 2TB ADATA SX8200 Pro M2 NVME (Games) - 8GB RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra - Sound Blaster Audigy 5 RX - EVGA Supernova 750w G2 - Antec 302 - 24" Asus VG248QE
 
JustinHEMI
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 886
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/02/13 12:36:41
  • Location: Pittsburgh, PA
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 2
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/14 08:17:25 (permalink)
^^^ not true.

Justin

| Intel i7 12900KS | Asus Z690 ROG Strix | EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 |
| 32gb G Skill DDR5 6000C36 | EVGA SuperNova G6 1000 | 1TB Samsung 980/970 M.2s | 
Sennheiser DAC/AMP | Fractal Design Torrent | Arctic Liquid Freezer 420 | Asus PG278QR |
Sennheiser HD660s | Asus ROG Strix TKL | Logitech G502 Lightspeed |


Baltothewolf
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3762
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/03/23 23:27:34
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 5
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/14 13:50:19 (permalink)
kaninja
Baltothewolf

But you get comfort, and luxury. My insight seats are some of the most uncomfortable seats I have ever sat on. Now if I swap in s2k seats and steering wheel the ride is MUCH better, but the seats cost 600$ and the steering wheel is 200 lol. If my Mustang was still running I would drive that around town, and use the insight for down the hill trips, but alas, it doesn't run.



Ha ha, true I do have nice pillowy electric leather seats with 8 way adjustability, but sometimes I would trade a bit of comfort away when I see these little gas sippers pull up at the station a few minutes after I have started pumping gas, fill their cars and drive away while I am still there trying to fill my swimming pool sized tank.


The main reason I said what I said is, my uncle has a 2007 Explorer limited and it's SOOOO COMFORTABLE. Whenever I'm down there, I ditch the insight and drive that instead haha. Sure I don't have to pay for gas, but still. 
 
Also, why not look into getting an insight? If your commute is over 30 miles each way, you would be in for massive savings. Heck, even a Civic VX would be a great option, as they still get 50+ easy.
 
I have only owned my insight for 2 1/2 months and I have driven 3,737 miles, getting a total of 57.5MPG. Now, this is including that my first 2 tanks were under 50MPG as I had clogged Catalytic coverters (which I hollowed out, Insights are smog excempt in Cali). Comparing that to what my '95 Camry used to get (30MPG average) I have saved 436$. I paid 2,000 for this car, and have about 800$ in repairs to it since I bought it. This car will pay for itself in 2 years. Comparing to say, 20mpg like my uncle gets it's a total saved of 654 in 2 months! A decent Insight with a good IMA pack costs about 3500-4500$ depending on the color. Something to consider.

 
Here is the Data to my Insight.
 
  • Lifetime Fuel Economy: 57.5 mpg (US), 4.1 L/100 km, 69 mpg (Imp)
  • 90-day Fuel Economy: 57.5 mpg (US), 4.1 L/100 km, 69 mpg (Imp)
  • 3-tank Fuel Economy: 61.7 mpg (US), 3.8 L/100 km, 74.1 mpg (Imp)
  • EPA Combined Rating / % over rating: 53 mpg (US) / 8.5% (based on 90-day fuel economy)
  • Total fills: 7
  • Average cost per gal/L: $3.23 per gal (US); $0.00 per L (price data entered for 7 fill/s)
  • Average cost per fill: $30.05
  • Average distance cost: $0.06 per mi. / $0.03 per km
  • Total fuel used: 65.03 gal (US), 246.2 L
  • Total distance traveled: 3737.8 mi. / 6015.4 km
  • Total cost: $210.34
  • Total fuel saved vs. EPA: 5.5 gal. (US) / 20.8 L
  • Total saved: $17.77 (based on avg. cost per gal./L)
  • Average tank distance: 534 mi. / 859.3 km
I would also like to add, for the past 4 tanks, I haven't gotten under 60mpg. I was getting really crappy MPG due to many problems I was having with this car due to serious neglect from the previous owner, but the biggest impact was 2 things, tires and spark plugs. Tires gave me a 5-10mpg bump, and spark plugs picked me up 1 or 2. I'm going to be getting the proper underbelly paneling, and front wheel skirts (picture them as reversed mud flaps, designed to deflect the air around the tires instead of the tires acting like a wind wall). I should easily be getting 65+ per tank after that, and 75+ in the summer.
 
Oh also ANOTHER thing, before anyone says "but hybrid batteries only last 2-3 years!". No, they do not. if you properly take care of them, batteries can last 10+ years depending on  if you grid charge it, the climate and how heavily you abuse it. I personally know a person who has their original Honda battery from 2000. His is going out and throwing codes now, and needs to replace it, but 14.5 years isn't bad. Hybrid batteries are 2,100$.
post edited by Baltothewolf - 2014/12/14 14:10:34

My Laptop (GE63VR-7RF):
-7700HQ.
-16GB RAM.
-GTX 1070.
-128GB SSD.
-1X 1TB 7200 spinny drive.

kaninja
Omnipotent Enthusiast
  • Total Posts : 8755
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/10/10 23:51:13
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 25
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/14 16:35:07 (permalink)
Baltothewolf
 
The main reason I said what I said is, my uncle has a 2007 Explorer limited and it's SOOOO COMFORTABLE. Whenever I'm down there, I ditch the insight and drive that instead haha. Sure I don't have to pay for gas, but still. 
 
Also, why not look into getting an insight? If your commute is over 30 miles each way, you would be in for massive savings. Heck, even a Civic VX would be a great option, as they still get 50+ easy.
 
I have only owned my insight for 2 1/2 months and I have driven 3,737 miles, getting a total of 57.5MPG. Now, this is including that my first 2 tanks were under 50MPG as I had clogged Catalytic coverters (which I hollowed out, Insights are smog excempt in Cali). Comparing that to what my '95 Camry used to get (30MPG average) I have saved 436$. I paid 2,000 for this car, and have about 800$ in repairs to it since I bought it. This car will pay for itself in 2 years. Comparing to say, 20mpg like my uncle gets it's a total saved of 654 in 2 months! A decent Insight with a good IMA pack costs about 3500-4500$ depending on the color. Something to consider.

 
Here is the Data to my Insight.
 
  • Lifetime Fuel Economy: 57.5 mpg (US), 4.1 L/100 km, 69 mpg (Imp)
  • 90-day Fuel Economy: 57.5 mpg (US), 4.1 L/100 km, 69 mpg (Imp)
  • 3-tank Fuel Economy: 61.7 mpg (US), 3.8 L/100 km, 74.1 mpg (Imp)
  • EPA Combined Rating / % over rating: 53 mpg (US) / 8.5% (based on 90-day fuel economy)
  • Total fills: 7
  • Average cost per gal/L: $3.23 per gal (US); $0.00 per L (price data entered for 7 fill/s)
  • Average cost per fill: $30.05
  • Average distance cost: $0.06 per mi. / $0.03 per km
  • Total fuel used: 65.03 gal (US), 246.2 L
  • Total distance traveled: 3737.8 mi. / 6015.4 km
  • Total cost: $210.34
  • Total fuel saved vs. EPA: 5.5 gal. (US) / 20.8 L
  • Total saved: $17.77 (based on avg. cost per gal./L)
  • Average tank distance: 534 mi. / 859.3 km
I would also like to add, for the past 4 tanks, I haven't gotten under 60mpg. I was getting really crappy MPG due to many problems I was having with this car due to serious neglect from the previous owner, but the biggest impact was 2 things, tires and spark plugs. Tires gave me a 5-10mpg bump, and spark plugs picked me up 1 or 2. I'm going to be getting the proper underbelly paneling, and front wheel skirts (picture them as reversed mud flaps, designed to deflect the air around the tires instead of the tires acting like a wind wall). I should easily be getting 65+ per tank after that, and 75+ in the summer.
 
Oh also ANOTHER thing, before anyone says "but hybrid batteries only last 2-3 years!". No, they do not. if you properly take care of them, batteries can last 10+ years depending on  if you grid charge it, the climate and how heavily you abuse it. I personally know a person who has their original Honda battery from 2000. His is going out and throwing codes now, and needs to replace it, but 14.5 years isn't bad. Hybrid batteries are 2,100$.




Yeah, a small car with great fuel economy would be great.  However I need the space and towing ability of the Explorer.  I'm a single Dad and can't afford 2 vehicles right now.  The Explorer is paid off and if I am going to get another vehicle it will be a new SUV type vehicle with somewhat decent off road capability.  The new Jeep Cherokee had me excited for a bit but then north America didn't get the 2.0 turbo diesel, and the new 9-speed automatic in the thing is a complete mess with terrible shifting and blown trannies galore!!!.....so that option is out.  All I need is 20mpg city and 32mpg hwy and I will be happy.
 

Corsair 650D   -  i5 3570K @ 4.6GHz  -  Corsair H80i  -  MSI Z77 M-Power  -  16GB DDR3 Corsair Dominator Platinum
WD 1TB Caviar Black x2  -  OCZ 120GB Vertex2 SSD  -  Corsair HX620  -  GTX285 SSC  -  Samsung T240  -  DIR-655
 


Violence.
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1913
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/11/12 14:06:57
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 5
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/14 17:34:43 (permalink)
Im in need of a tow vehicle for cars ect but still need to drive it to work. I may just go diesel. seems a more reasonable choice. my friends gmc 2500 HD gets like 8 mpg. id go broke. lol
 
I have seen diesels over 35mpg
Baltothewolf
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3762
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/03/23 23:27:34
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 5
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/14 17:43:26 (permalink)
kaninja
Baltothewolf
 
The main reason I said what I said is, my uncle has a 2007 Explorer limited and it's SOOOO COMFORTABLE. Whenever I'm down there, I ditch the insight and drive that instead haha. Sure I don't have to pay for gas, but still. 
 
Also, why not look into getting an insight? If your commute is over 30 miles each way, you would be in for massive savings. Heck, even a Civic VX would be a great option, as they still get 50+ easy.
 
I have only owned my insight for 2 1/2 months and I have driven 3,737 miles, getting a total of 57.5MPG. Now, this is including that my first 2 tanks were under 50MPG as I had clogged Catalytic coverters (which I hollowed out, Insights are smog excempt in Cali). Comparing that to what my '95 Camry used to get (30MPG average) I have saved 436$. I paid 2,000 for this car, and have about 800$ in repairs to it since I bought it. This car will pay for itself in 2 years. Comparing to say, 20mpg like my uncle gets it's a total saved of 654 in 2 months! A decent Insight with a good IMA pack costs about 3500-4500$ depending on the color. Something to consider.

 
Here is the Data to my Insight.
 
  • Lifetime Fuel Economy: 57.5 mpg (US), 4.1 L/100 km, 69 mpg (Imp)
  • 90-day Fuel Economy: 57.5 mpg (US), 4.1 L/100 km, 69 mpg (Imp)
  • 3-tank Fuel Economy: 61.7 mpg (US), 3.8 L/100 km, 74.1 mpg (Imp)
  • EPA Combined Rating / % over rating: 53 mpg (US) / 8.5% (based on 90-day fuel economy)
  • Total fills: 7
  • Average cost per gal/L: $3.23 per gal (US); $0.00 per L (price data entered for 7 fill/s)
  • Average cost per fill: $30.05
  • Average distance cost: $0.06 per mi. / $0.03 per km
  • Total fuel used: 65.03 gal (US), 246.2 L
  • Total distance traveled: 3737.8 mi. / 6015.4 km
  • Total cost: $210.34
  • Total fuel saved vs. EPA: 5.5 gal. (US) / 20.8 L
  • Total saved: $17.77 (based on avg. cost per gal./L)
  • Average tank distance: 534 mi. / 859.3 km
I would also like to add, for the past 4 tanks, I haven't gotten under 60mpg. I was getting really crappy MPG due to many problems I was having with this car due to serious neglect from the previous owner, but the biggest impact was 2 things, tires and spark plugs. Tires gave me a 5-10mpg bump, and spark plugs picked me up 1 or 2. I'm going to be getting the proper underbelly paneling, and front wheel skirts (picture them as reversed mud flaps, designed to deflect the air around the tires instead of the tires acting like a wind wall). I should easily be getting 65+ per tank after that, and 75+ in the summer.
 
Oh also ANOTHER thing, before anyone says "but hybrid batteries only last 2-3 years!". No, they do not. if you properly take care of them, batteries can last 10+ years depending on  if you grid charge it, the climate and how heavily you abuse it. I personally know a person who has their original Honda battery from 2000. His is going out and throwing codes now, and needs to replace it, but 14.5 years isn't bad. Hybrid batteries are 2,100$.




Yeah, a small car with great fuel economy would be great.  However I need the space and towing ability of the Explorer.  I'm a single Dad and can't afford 2 vehicles right now.  The Explorer is paid off and if I am going to get another vehicle it will be a new SUV type vehicle with somewhat decent off road capability.  The new Jeep Cherokee had me excited for a bit but then north America didn't get the 2.0 turbo diesel, and the new 9-speed automatic in the thing is a complete mess with terrible shifting and blown trannies galore!!!.....so that option is out.  All I need is 20mpg city and 32mpg hwy and I will be happy.
 

You sound exactly like my uncle, single dad who needs the towing capacity and space. Ironic how the world works O.o

My Laptop (GE63VR-7RF):
-7700HQ.
-16GB RAM.
-GTX 1070.
-128GB SSD.
-1X 1TB 7200 spinny drive.

ty_ger07
Insert Custom Title Here
  • Total Posts : 21171
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/04/10 23:48:15
  • Location: traveler
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 270
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/14 18:23:04 (permalink)
_Nite_
Automatic is only good for racing and banging around town in a standard car
 
Manual is needed for racing, offroading and pulling heavy loads.




Fixed ^^
HAZMAN_THE_GREAT
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 4805
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/12/01 04:40:46
  • Location: Planet Earth
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 7
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/15 07:21:24 (permalink)
Baltothewolf
kaninja
Baltothewolf

But you get comfort, and luxury. My insight seats are some of the most uncomfortable seats I have ever sat on. Now if I swap in s2k seats and steering wheel the ride is MUCH better, but the seats cost 600$ and the steering wheel is 200 lol. If my Mustang was still running I would drive that around town, and use the insight for down the hill trips, but alas, it doesn't run.



Ha ha, true I do have nice pillowy electric leather seats with 8 way adjustability, but sometimes I would trade a bit of comfort away when I see these little gas sippers pull up at the station a few minutes after I have started pumping gas, fill their cars and drive away while I am still there trying to fill my swimming pool sized tank.


The main reason I said what I said is, my uncle has a 2007 Explorer limited and it's SOOOO COMFORTABLE. Whenever I'm down there, I ditch the insight and drive that instead haha. Sure I don't have to pay for gas, but still. 
 
Also, why not look into getting an insight? If your commute is over 30 miles each way, you would be in for massive savings. Heck, even a Civic VX would be a great option, as they still get 50+ easy.
 
I have only owned my insight for 2 1/2 months and I have driven 3,737 miles, getting a total of 57.5MPG. Now, this is including that my first 2 tanks were under 50MPG as I had clogged Catalytic coverters (which I hollowed out, Insights are smog excempt in Cali). Comparing that to what my '95 Camry used to get (30MPG average) I have saved 436$. I paid 2,000 for this car, and have about 800$ in repairs to it since I bought it. This car will pay for itself in 2 years. Comparing to say, 20mpg like my uncle gets it's a total saved of 654 in 2 months! A decent Insight with a good IMA pack costs about 3500-4500$ depending on the color. Something to consider.

 
Here is the Data to my Insight.
 
  • Lifetime Fuel Economy: 57.5 mpg (US), 4.1 L/100 km, 69 mpg (Imp)
  • 90-day Fuel Economy: 57.5 mpg (US), 4.1 L/100 km, 69 mpg (Imp)
  • 3-tank Fuel Economy: 61.7 mpg (US), 3.8 L/100 km, 74.1 mpg (Imp)
  • EPA Combined Rating / % over rating: 53 mpg (US) / 8.5% (based on 90-day fuel economy)
  • Total fills: 7
  • Average cost per gal/L: $3.23 per gal (US); $0.00 per L (price data entered for 7 fill/s)
  • Average cost per fill: $30.05
  • Average distance cost: $0.06 per mi. / $0.03 per km
  • Total fuel used: 65.03 gal (US), 246.2 L
  • Total distance traveled: 3737.8 mi. / 6015.4 km
  • Total cost: $210.34
  • Total fuel saved vs. EPA: 5.5 gal. (US) / 20.8 L
  • Total saved: $17.77 (based on avg. cost per gal./L)
  • Average tank distance: 534 mi. / 859.3 km
I would also like to add, for the past 4 tanks, I haven't gotten under 60mpg. I was getting really crappy MPG due to many problems I was having with this car due to serious neglect from the previous owner, but the biggest impact was 2 things, tires and spark plugs. Tires gave me a 5-10mpg bump, and spark plugs picked me up 1 or 2. I'm going to be getting the proper underbelly paneling, and front wheel skirts (picture them as reversed mud flaps, designed to deflect the air around the tires instead of the tires acting like a wind wall). I should easily be getting 65+ per tank after that, and 75+ in the summer.
 
Oh also ANOTHER thing, before anyone says "but hybrid batteries only last 2-3 years!". No, they do not. if you properly take care of them, batteries can last 10+ years depending on  if you grid charge it, the climate and how heavily you abuse it. I personally know a person who has their original Honda battery from 2000. His is going out and throwing codes now, and needs to replace it, but 14.5 years isn't bad. Hybrid batteries are 2,100$.


So you say your car is going to pay itself in 2 years even though you put $800 in repairs right? Typically since you have a car that you bought that had to have repairs, your going to have to have even more repairs. That means either the owner did a poor job with maintenance as well as condition of the car or that means weather could play a part in parts being ruined. Also at times if you bought a car that was previously a rental car your generally going to have trouble too(I am sure you peeps understand where I am coming from there). Balto is going to be like DAMN IT whats broken this time. More repairs means more time for the car to pay itself back.


ty_ger07
Insert Custom Title Here
  • Total Posts : 21171
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/04/10 23:48:15
  • Location: traveler
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 270
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/15 08:09:44 (permalink)
HAZMAN_THE_GREAT
 
So you say your car is going to pay itself in 2 years even though you put $800 in repairs right? Typically since you have a car that you bought that had to have repairs, your going to have to have even more repairs. That means either the owner did a poor job with maintenance as well as condition of the car or that means weather could play a part in parts being ruined. Also at times if you bought a car that was previously a rental car your generally going to have trouble too(I am sure you peeps understand where I am coming from there). Balto is going to be like DAMN IT whats broken this time. More repairs means more time for the car to pay itself back.



I don't think you can make that assumption.  Maintenance and preventative maintenance doesn't increase the odds of more maintenance and preventative maintenance in the future.  Actually, it should lower the odds.  Additionally, I owned a former rental car and had very few issues.
 
I think you need to try to stay positive.
post edited by ty_ger07 - 2014/12/15 08:11:53
_Nite_
Insert Custom Title Here
  • Total Posts : 19175
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/04/18 15:35:04
  • Location: Sumner, Washington
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 46
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/15 16:40:16 (permalink)
ty_ger07
_Nite_
Automatic is only good for racing and banging around town in a standard car
 
Manual is needed for racing, offroading and pulling heavy loads.




Fixed ^^




how am I wrong on this? you need manual for better control on the shifting through the gears as it shaves off seconds in drag racing or nascar racing. I never seen anyone use an automatic with racing period.
 
and of course with offroad and pulling, low gear is needed for torque
post edited by _Nite_ - 2014/12/15 16:47:40

Gaming Rig: AMD Ryzen 7 2700x @ 4.25Ghz - Asrock B450 Pro 4 - 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4 3000 - 240GB SSD (OS), 1TB ADATA SU800 SSD and 2TB ADATA SX8200 Pro M2 NVME (Games) - 8GB RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra - Sound Blaster Audigy 5 RX - EVGA Supernova 750w G2 - Antec 302 - 24" Asus VG248QE
 
-ZS-Carpenter
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1547
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/03/07 15:08:55
  • Location: My Affiliate Code: 6VBFZ0I9GZ
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 2
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/15 17:36:57 (permalink)
_Nite_
ty_ger07
_Nite_
Automatic is only good for racing and banging around town in a standard car
 
Manual is needed for racing, offroading and pulling heavy loads.




Fixed ^^




how am I wrong on this? you need manual for better control on the shifting through the gears as it shaves off seconds in drag racing or nascar racing. I never seen anyone use an automatic with racing period.
 
and of course with offroad and pulling, low gear is needed for torque




Modern autos and DCTs give the same control with faster flawless shifts making them the better option. As far as drag racing auto give more consistent ETs and launches. Nascar and a lot of sanctioned racing leagues have rules as to what kind of setup you can run, some require manuals some allow autos and DCT in some the only option is DCT, it all come down to the rules of the league.
 
For towing it is a toss up to a point. Semi trucks/dump trucks are manuals do to the amount of gears they need, most have 15 gears, give or take, depending on what trans they have and how many splitters. Heavy duty pickups run autos for the most part(not sure if dodge still offers a manual in the 3500 ram or not, they used to but not sure anymore) and have no problems towing what most people would consider a very heavy load. We have a couple Ford F550 super dutys at work that can legally pull a 26k lb trailer with a max gcwr of 35k lb and they have 6 speed autos in them.

 
 
 
Main rig: gaming/folding
Z68 FTW 2600k@4.2  980 Ti sc+
Dedicated folders
x79 Classy/4820k 3x 970
Q9550/780i 2x 770
Baltothewolf
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3762
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/03/23 23:27:34
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 5
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/15 18:02:15 (permalink)
HAZMAN_THE_GREAT
Baltothewolf
kaninja
Baltothewolf

But you get comfort, and luxury. My insight seats are some of the most uncomfortable seats I have ever sat on. Now if I swap in s2k seats and steering wheel the ride is MUCH better, but the seats cost 600$ and the steering wheel is 200 lol. If my Mustang was still running I would drive that around town, and use the insight for down the hill trips, but alas, it doesn't run.



Ha ha, true I do have nice pillowy electric leather seats with 8 way adjustability, but sometimes I would trade a bit of comfort away when I see these little gas sippers pull up at the station a few minutes after I have started pumping gas, fill their cars and drive away while I am still there trying to fill my swimming pool sized tank.





So you say your car is going to pay itself in 2 years even though you put $800 in repairs right? Typically since you have a car that you bought that had to have repairs, your going to have to have even more repairs. That means either the owner did a poor job with maintenance as well as condition of the car or that means weather could play a part in parts being ruined. Also at times if you bought a car that was previously a rental car your generally going to have trouble too(I am sure you peeps understand where I am coming from there). Balto is going to be like DAMN IT whats broken this time. More repairs means more time for the car to pay itself back.

I have covered literally everything that can break/wear out, except for tires which wear out on their own an have to be replaced every so often. The previous owner did not take care of the car, which is why I have had to do all the repairs I have.

My Laptop (GE63VR-7RF):
-7700HQ.
-16GB RAM.
-GTX 1070.
-128GB SSD.
-1X 1TB 7200 spinny drive.

kram36
The Destroyer
  • Total Posts : 21477
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/10/27 19:00:58
  • Location: United States
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 72
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/15 20:33:29 (permalink)
_Nite_
ty_ger07
_Nite_
Automatic is only good for racing and banging around town in a standard car
 
Manual is needed for racing, offroading and pulling heavy loads.




Fixed ^^




how am I wrong on this? you need manual for better control on the shifting through the gears as it shaves off seconds in drag racing or nascar racing. I never seen anyone use an automatic with racing period.
 
and of course with offroad and pulling, low gear is needed for torque


You might want to start reading this thread from the beginning or just check out this post as for drag racing with an auto.


http://forums.evga.com/FindPost/2263313
MrImSoGood
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1285
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/11/20 08:41:17
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/15 20:59:14 (permalink)
wrinvert

 
that only apply to men under 6 feet and/or a shoe size smaller then a 15
ty_ger07
Insert Custom Title Here
  • Total Posts : 21171
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/04/10 23:48:15
  • Location: traveler
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 270
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/15 21:12:36 (permalink)
_Nite_
ty_ger07
_Nite_
Automatic is only good for racing and banging around town in a standard car
 
Manual is needed for racing, offroading and pulling heavy loads.




Fixed ^^




how am I wrong on this? you need manual for better control on the shifting through the gears as it shaves off seconds in drag racing or nascar racing. I never seen anyone use an automatic with racing period.
 
and of course with offroad and pulling, low gear is needed for torque




I think you will start seeing a lot more automatics racing if you start looking and don't make assumptions.   The majority of the big block muscle cars you see racing down the drag strip are automatics.  Also, Formula 1 transmissions are considered semi-automatic transmissions.  There are a lot of Le Mans race cars with dual clutch transmissions or other forms of automatic transmission. Top fuel drag cars are neither automatic or manual, but I think it is safe to say that they are a lot more similar to automatic as far as end-result is concerned.  Especially considering that the top fuel cars use a timed progression of clutch engagements which is not controlled by the driver.  Nascar still uses carburetors, so I think you can see that your point there was silly -- Nascar isn't about what is the best but is instead about being pure to the redneck tradition with a lot of rules enforcing that "purity".
 
Many of the fastest production vehicles have automatic transmissions and it keeps on trickling down to even the cheapest cars.
 
9.68 on a stock automatic

post edited by ty_ger07 - 2014/12/15 21:26:55
kram36
The Destroyer
  • Total Posts : 21477
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/10/27 19:00:58
  • Location: United States
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 72
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/16 05:21:51 (permalink)
Fastest "street car" in the world. I don't see this guy pressing a clutch or moving an arm off the steering wheel to shift gears.
 
https://www.youtube.com/w...mp;v=1yVnho0xqow#t=211
Baltothewolf
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3762
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/03/23 23:27:34
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 5
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/16 08:31:04 (permalink)
Noo so close, I can taste it! The auto version of the insight wouldn't be able to touch this.


My Laptop (GE63VR-7RF):
-7700HQ.
-16GB RAM.
-GTX 1070.
-128GB SSD.
-1X 1TB 7200 spinny drive.

candle_86
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3677
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/02/24 17:59:37
  • Location: Fort Worth, Texas
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 7
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/17 17:32:23 (permalink)
you know it really really depends, in my Jeep or my truck, no thanks I'll stick with Automatic, but when I finish rebuilding my 300ZX its going to be stick. It really depends on what you drive. My Grand Cherokee is my daily commute and traffic in DFW is @ 7am and @ 5pm is terrible, id rather not have to shift every 3 seconds as traffic stops and goes, as for my truck, its used for hauling things, and its 3 speed automatic does just fine.
Violence.
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1913
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/11/12 14:06:57
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 5
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/17 18:37:11 (permalink)
kram36
Fastest "street car" in the world. I don't see this guy pressing a clutch or moving an arm off the steering wheel to shift gears.
 
https://www.youtube.com/w...mp;v=1yVnho0xqow#t=211




 
old video. that truck went into the 5's. AND it has a overdrive unit. 
 

kram36
The Destroyer
  • Total Posts : 21477
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/10/27 19:00:58
  • Location: United States
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 72
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/17 20:10:49 (permalink)
Violence.
kram36
Fastest "street car" in the world. I don't see this guy pressing a clutch or moving an arm off the steering wheel to shift gears.
 
https://www.youtube.com/w...mp;v=1yVnho0xqow#t=211




 
old video. that truck went into the 5's. AND it has a overdrive unit. 
 



Under 6 sec 1/4 mile, that's insane. Hard for me to tell, but what was he running against? Looks like the other car beat him?
 
EDIT:
 
I went to the actual youtube page to see if it had any info on the other car. I found this.
 
"Larry Larson drove this car legally for over 1000+ miles from track to track to compete in drag week! In order for a car to participate in Hot Rod Drag Week, it has to be street legal and pass all emission laws. This car passed and participated in Hot Rod Drag Week."
 
The is no way on Earth that truck could pass emission laws.
post edited by kram36 - 2014/12/17 20:17:04
ty_ger07
Insert Custom Title Here
  • Total Posts : 21171
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/04/10 23:48:15
  • Location: traveler
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 270
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/17 20:30:35 (permalink)
kram36
The is no way on Earth that truck could pass emission laws.



I am sure that he de-tuned it a ton when he was driving it around town.  He probably put air filters on it also when he was driving around on the street.  I wonder about the exhaust though.... How much are they allowed to change between street and race configuration to still be considered "street legal"?
rcarlos243
New Member
  • Total Posts : 97
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/10/04 05:15:04
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/18 00:27:31 (permalink)
Baltothewolf
Noo so close, I can taste it! The auto version of the insight wouldn't be able to touch this.





damn you get like double the MPG of my corolla...
Baltothewolf
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3762
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/03/23 23:27:34
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 5
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/18 00:52:23 (permalink)
rcarlos243
Baltothewolf
Noo so close, I can taste it! The auto version of the insight wouldn't be able to touch this.




damn you get like double the MPG of my corolla...




You have.
More power.
More seats.
Much lower road noise.
Cheaper maintenance.
High parts availability.
Great resell value ('00 corolla's with 150-200k still sell for 4k+).
 
When you look at the big picture, the Insight isn't for everyone. You have to really love the car to tolerate driving it. There are things about the Insight that I absolutely hate (such as the seats and road noise) but then there are things I love. It's unique, extremely engaging to drive, keeps you from getting bored on long trips, and personally, I like the look of it. Meh.

My Laptop (GE63VR-7RF):
-7700HQ.
-16GB RAM.
-GTX 1070.
-128GB SSD.
-1X 1TB 7200 spinny drive.

Bruno747
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3909
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/01/13 11:00:12
  • Location: Looking on google to see what Nvidia is going to o
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 5
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/20 12:27:34 (permalink)
HAZMAN_THE_GREAT
I like my mazda 3. Its gets good  MPG just running regular unleaded gas as you can see in the pic down below. Its because of that skyactiv engine they have. That high compression ratio for the car does wonders. It has a 14 to 1 compression ratio.  I can go 540 miles on a 13 gallon tank.  I average about 33mpg driving in the city from 17mph-30mph. The trans and chassis of the car is also skyactiv as well. Lighter chassis saves weight of course and the trans helps with shift points to save on fuel.  But I am with Balto as well. I like diesel cars because more MPG and torque. I dont care about horsepower because most of the time I wont be able to full throttle and reach my top speed. I rather have that get up and go with torque instead. Also with more torque you can tow more things. But lets not forget your drive shaft has to be able to handle the towing capacity too. Bad thing about diesel is that engines are more expensive to fix, some cities/small towns do not offer diesel at their pumps, and if you live in the country areas in Texas diesel cost A LOT. 
 

 
 




 
Not to pull this in a different direction, but it would be great if Mazda would quit screwing around the release the Skyactive-D in the usa. That mileage might be 75 if they would get moving.

X399 Designare EX, Threadripper 1950x, Overkill Water 560mm dual pass radiator. Heatkiller IV Block Dual 960 EVO 500gb Raid 0 bootable, Quad Channel 64gb DDR4 @ 2933/15-16-16-31, RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra, Corsair RM850x, Tower 900
Baltothewolf
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3762
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/03/23 23:27:34
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 5
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/20 12:47:00 (permalink)
Doing 70-75mph. I ended up with 67.8MPG by the time I got home due to 3 hours of stop and go traffic, and a ton of uphill driving.
 


My Laptop (GE63VR-7RF):
-7700HQ.
-16GB RAM.
-GTX 1070.
-128GB SSD.
-1X 1TB 7200 spinny drive.

gravedigger78
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 964
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/05/21 13:26:03
  • Location: Michigan
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 2
Re: Auto vs Manual Transmisions 2014/12/23 18:45:58 (permalink)
Maunal transmissions are so superior that the automotive elite have computerized them to automatically shift but the general design is still a manual
Page: << < ..67 > Showing page 6 of 7
Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile