EVGA

Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
  • Total Posts : 38977
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
  • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 282
2014/10/06 18:15:14 (permalink)
Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 Note the (“Advanced Methods” setting)
With the newer NVIDIA drivers, it looks like Core17 works well on Maxwell.  We’ve released Core17 to Maxwell on adv (“Advanced Methods” setting).  If you’re having problems, you can set from adv back to the regular fah setting, allowing donors to opt out if they’re having problems.  The latest drivers are recommended.
 
I will wait and get one GTX 990 with the Hyper Copper when it comes out for my first Maxwell.
 
post edited by bcavnaugh - 2014/10/06 18:16:51

Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


 
#1

40 Replies Related Threads

    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 38977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 282
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/16 04:43:47 (permalink)
    Removed
    post edited by bcavnaugh - 2014/10/16 04:53:23

    Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


     
    #2
    yodap
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 4642
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/05/15 06:13:40
    • Location: NY, Upstate
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 8
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/17 19:40:05 (permalink)
    I'm basing this on 24 hours of core17 9201's. GTX970: 240k x 365 = 87,600,000 points/yr. That's one  $350 card.
    Core15 and 18 = about 55-70k ppd. 70k x 365 = 25,550,000/yr.
    My GTX780 gets 185k x 365 = 67,525,000/yr on the same core17 wu's.
     
    bcav, your OP was correct or on the right track. It just took Fah  2 weeks to disperse the wu's properly.
     
    To all folders that purchased Maxwell cards, good luck and hope Fah keeps em coming.
     
    I'll be testing 780 vs 970 with a kill-o-watt meter in the next few days to add fuel to the stats.
     
    btw I'm using the (latest) 344.16 drivers.
     .
    post edited by yodap - 2014/10/17 19:43:48


     

     
    #3
    mdk7777777
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 220
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2014/01/03 12:01:05
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/17 21:52:21 (permalink)
    well, we aren't out of the woods yet.
     
    Only one working WU.
    The plan..momentum...was to launch core 18 WU.
    hence core 17 are not in the pipeline.
     
    I'm sure they are working on the issues...I'm just not convinced we won't see shortages of optimized WU again in the near future.
    #4
    yodap
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 4642
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/05/15 06:13:40
    • Location: NY, Upstate
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 8
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/18 03:45:19 (permalink)
            "I'm sure they are working on the issues...I'm just not convinced we won't see shortages of optimized WU again in the near future."
     
    It's to be expected. There's always bumps in the road with Fah.
    The 780 has only picked up 1 9201 in the same time span (36 hours) as the 970. It's been getting 13000 and the new 104xx core 17's.


     

     
    #5
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 38977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 282
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/18 07:15:00 (permalink)
    Still if no GTX 990 is released next year then I will only Fold on my AMD GPUs and when my current R9 290X die out then maybe fah will have better project for the NVIDIA Maxwell GPU. If not then that might be the end of my Folding Days.

    Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


     
    #6
    Drazhar
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 2370
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/12/07 02:14:51
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 4
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/18 17:13:42 (permalink)
    My 980 seems to be picking up lots of Core17 now, it makes me happy.

    I'm still planning on replacing my PSU, cleaning out the case and adding an extra 980 along with some SSDs in the next year though.

    Mmm, pretty computer.
     
    Maybe I'll be able to clean the rest of the room some day lol


     
    #7
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 38977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 282
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/18 17:25:08 (permalink)
    I have read that the 980 uses a lot less power too!

    Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


     
    #8
    Ranmacanada
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 992
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/09/22 10:44:47
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/19 10:28:18 (permalink)
    My 970 has been going since I picked it up from the border yesterday, and I am loving this.  Tonnes of points, less power usage, and it cool and quiet!  Currently getting 232k ppd

     

    ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)
    AMD Ryzen 2700
    Fold for the CURE!
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    EVGA 1080Ti Hybrid

    #9
    mdk7777777
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 220
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2014/01/03 12:01:05
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/23 07:05:37 (permalink)
    Well, that didn't take long.
     
    As I predicted, Maxwell will soon return to 1/4 capacity.
     
    PG knows that they will launch WU that are crippled for Maxwell, but will do it anyway rather than fix the software to support Maxwell or only assign working WU to Maxwell.
     
    I can't support this and will stop folding again until they think it is worth their time to support Maxwell.
     
    From the Beta Forum:
     

    Re: Core18 V3 Feedback

    Breach:
    Re PPD Maxwell: Core 17: P9201 - 277K, Core 18 (0.0.3) P10xxx - 77K
    Kyleb:
    OK, so I think the conclusion is that the points regression is just for Maxwell. I'm going to say that is going to be unavoidable for now and push this out to ADV soon.
    Kyleb:
    ....
    I agree with your recommendation. The current core upgrade should improve compatibility by fixing Maxwell.
     
     
    Sorry, simply crippling the software is not the same thing as "improving compatibility by fixing Maxwell."
     
    This logic permeates PG. People do not buy new cards to have them run at 1/4 speed.
     
    Do the work to accommodate the new hardware,  or don't have people fold on it.
     
    #10
    Drazhar
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 2370
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/12/07 02:14:51
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 4
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/23 10:53:51 (permalink)
    Ugh, brutal.


     
    #11
    widsss
    iCX Member
    • Total Posts : 432
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/03/07 09:56:20
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/23 17:44:00 (permalink)
    So a non-maxwell card will fold core 18 better than maxwell?  Or is the gimping going to cover all cards?

     
    Intel i7 3770K @ 4.5 Ghz. / Asus P67 Pro / 2 x EVGA GTX 980 SC / 16gb Corsair Vengeance RAM  / 2 x Crucial 64 gb. SSD / 1 Tb. Seagate / Corsair AX 850  / Corsair H100

    Intel i7 3930k @ 4.3 Ghz / Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 2 x EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC  /  32 gb Gskill Ripjaws RAM / 256 gb Vertex 4 SSD / Corsair AX1200i / Corsair H110i GT

    #12
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 38977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 282
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/23 18:16:53 (permalink)
    widsss
    So a non-maxwell card will fold core 18 better than maxwell?  Or is the gimping going to cover all cards?

    I would say more that Core 17 have been fixed to support the new Maxwell Card and FAH is working on Core 18 now to work with the Maxwell card.
     
    But Yes.

    Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


     
    #13
    widsss
    iCX Member
    • Total Posts : 432
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/03/07 09:56:20
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/23 18:35:30 (permalink)
    I wonder what AMD cards will do with core 18 and it's use of double precision.

     
    Intel i7 3770K @ 4.5 Ghz. / Asus P67 Pro / 2 x EVGA GTX 980 SC / 16gb Corsair Vengeance RAM  / 2 x Crucial 64 gb. SSD / 1 Tb. Seagate / Corsair AX 850  / Corsair H100

    Intel i7 3930k @ 4.3 Ghz / Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 2 x EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC  /  32 gb Gskill Ripjaws RAM / 256 gb Vertex 4 SSD / Corsair AX1200i / Corsair H110i GT

    #14
    mdk7777777
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 220
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2014/01/03 12:01:05
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/23 18:42:27 (permalink)
    Just to clarify:
     
    Core 18 is an upgrade of core 17 using the latest version of OPEN MM
    openMM is the opencl code that they use to build the forces and interactions of the atoms (the core math that communicates with the cards GPU math function capability.
     
    The newest open MM version is 6.1 or something.
     
    When these use these advanced(and optimized to run quickly on GPU) math functions, they see a speed up of their computations.
    However, something in MAxwell is giving errors (only on the new core18)
     
    So, rather than figure out where the problem lies (the maxwell hardware..how it handles and accelerates memory...or the drivers that NV has issued, or some problem with the openmm math software) they simply replace the advanced math functions(only on Maxwell cards) with simpler, older software.
     
    This allows the cards to function=finish without error, but at a huge slow down=1/4 speed.
     
    Since other cards are able to do the math functions without error...they should run as well as or better than the core 17 that they replace.
     
    I wrote the following to kyleb regarding my opinion of this strategy:
     
     "Pushing this type of WU is very poor for donor morale. It shows a lack of respect for the donors investment, time and electricity.

    This is the worst of all options. In order of preference the options are:

    1. continue to supply only the limited working WU to Maxwell cards
    2. suspend Maxwell support until the cores/driver issues are resolved
    3. send out intentionally crippled WU that run at 1/4 speed and don't inform donors of any plan to resolve the issues."
     
    As per usual when PM PG, I had no response.
     
    post edited by mdk7777777 - 2014/10/23 18:47:07
    #15
    mdk7777777
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 220
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2014/01/03 12:01:05
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/23 18:49:47 (permalink)
    I wonder what AMD cards will do with core 18 and it's use of double precision.
     
    they will run it well, but I don't think it is huge...10-20% improvement over previous...and of course you never know how they balance the factoring for points anyway. ;)
    #16
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 38977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 282
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/24 06:57:03 (permalink)
    To Date My two R9 290X have only received Core 17, I have yet to see one that is. (advanced)

    Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


     
    #17
    bison88
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 136
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2013/10/28 17:44:21
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/25 10:09:18 (permalink)
    mdk7777777
    Well, that didn't take long.
     
    As I predicted, Maxwell will soon return to 1/4 capacity.
     
    PG knows that they will launch WU that are crippled for Maxwell, but will do it anyway rather than fix the software to support Maxwell or only assign working WU to Maxwell.
     
    I can't support this and will stop folding again until they think it is worth their time to support Maxwell.
     
    Sorry, simply crippling the software is not the same thing as "improving compatibility by fixing Maxwell."
     
    This logic permeates PG. People do not buy new cards to have them run at 1/4 speed.
     
    Do the work to accommodate the new hardware,  or don't have people fold on it.
     




    I think the real hurtful thing is that they are willing to sacrifice the performance and PPD output by pushing out WU's that they know are broken for specific GPU's, yet then want to force people to run Core15 projects, and then refuse to take into consideration adding Bonus Points to Core15 WU's because it would somehow screw people of yesteryear.  The logic, it's flawless.
    #18
    Ranmacanada
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 992
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/09/22 10:44:47
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/26 08:56:32 (permalink)
    Well received my first core 15 today on my new 970.  These suck.  seriously.  2 minute 54 second fold time, with only 14093 points, and no bonus!  My ppd has dropped from 230k to 69999.

     

    ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)
    AMD Ryzen 2700
    Fold for the CURE!
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    EVGA 1080Ti Hybrid

    #19
    xanderf
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 2068
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2004/04/26 17:16:42
    • Location: Cleveland, OH
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 36
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/26 11:45:57 (permalink)
    Ranmacanada
    Well received my first core 15 today on my new 970.  These suck.  seriously.  2 minute 54 second fold time, with only 14093 points, and no bonus!  My ppd has dropped from 230k to 69999.




    It's better than it was a couple weeks ago - used to be 24/7 Core 15s for a while, there.  Now, at least, the Core 15 is the rare sighting and we mostly get good-performing Core 17s, so...I'll take it over the alternative!
     
    (Now, getting only Core 17s and FIXED Core 18s...that'd be nice...not holding my breath for it.  As long as I can eek by my 1.5 million points a month, I'll try not to lose any sleep over which cores Stanford feels like throwing me.)


    #20
    Ranmacanada
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 992
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/09/22 10:44:47
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/26 12:53:24 (permalink)
    That's good to hear.  I am worried though because halfway through this core 15 my card started to screech like a banshee, due to coil whine..

     

    ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)
    AMD Ryzen 2700
    Fold for the CURE!
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    EVGA 1080Ti Hybrid

    #21
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 38977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 282
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/26 14:08:13 (permalink)
    Ranmacanada
    Well received my first core 15 today on my new 970.  These suck.  seriously.  2 minute 54 second fold time, with only 14093 points, and no bonus!  My ppd has dropped from 230k to 69999.



    "2 minute 54 second fold time" This is SUPPER FAST.
    Our are you saying 2 minute 54 second fold time into the task?
    Are you using client-type = advanced ?
    post edited by bcavnaugh - 2014/10/26 14:09:56

    Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


     
    #22
    Ranmacanada
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 992
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/09/22 10:44:47
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/26 15:32:51 (permalink)
    2 minute 54 seconds per fold.
    And yes I am using client-type = advanced.  
     
    it was my first core 15 and my card had some serious coil whine while doing the core 15.  Now that I am back on a core 17, I have no coil whine.  My system is also using about 30 watts less power.
    During core 15 I was at 252 watts of total usage, during core 17 I am at 221 watts usage.  My time per fold on core 17 is 2 minutes 3-6 seconds, the seconds fluctuate a bit.
     
    And in case you are wondering, yes I have a killawatt type meter hooked up to my computer at all times. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812119560 is what I use to monitor my power usage.

     

    ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)
    AMD Ryzen 2700
    Fold for the CURE!
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    EVGA 1080Ti Hybrid

    #23
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 38977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 282
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/26 16:17:13 (permalink)
    Ranmacanada
    2 minute 54 seconds per fold.
    And yes I am using client-type = advanced.  
     
    it was my first core 15 and my card had some serious coil whine while doing the core 15.  Now that I am back on a core 17, I have no coil whine.  My system is also using about 30 watts less power.
    During core 15 I was at 252 watts of total usage, during core 17 I am at 221 watts usage.  My time per fold on core 17 is 2 minutes 3-6 seconds, the seconds fluctuate a bit.
     
    And in case you are wondering, yes I have a killawatt type meter hooked up to my computer at all times. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812119560 is what I use to monitor my power usage.



    When I did get a Core 15 it would take more than one Day to complete.
    They also take more power then any other Core that I have seen as well.
    Ranma^ a Good Break In "first core 15 and my card had some serious coil whine" for your GPU.
    post edited by bcavnaugh - 2014/10/26 16:21:24

    Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


     
    #24
    Grey_Beard
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 2232
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2013/12/23 11:50:37
    • Location: The Land of Milk and Honey
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 10
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/27 12:49:11 (permalink)
    Since I have one rig that has 3 780 Ti SC's, would it better to keep this on FAH and then use the four new GTX 980 SC which will be in two different rig for crunching?



    #25
    mdk7777777
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 220
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2014/01/03 12:01:05
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/27 18:44:02 (permalink)
    Yup, that sounds like a plan.
    Efficiency for folding on  maxwell is now going to 1/4 of the potential.
     

    Re: Core18 V3 Feedback

    by kyleb » Mon Oct 27, 2014 11:42 am
    OK, this core version has been moved to adv
    #26
    Drazhar
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 2370
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/12/07 02:14:51
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 4
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/27 19:20:21 (permalink)
    mdk7777777
    Yup, that sounds like a plan.
    Efficiency for folding on  maxwell is now going to 1/4 of the potential.
     

    Re: Core18 V3 Feedback

    by kyleb » Mon Oct 27, 2014 11:42 amOK, this core version has been moved to adv

    What if we take our flag off of advmethods?


     
    #27
    mdk7777777
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 220
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2014/01/03 12:01:05
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/27 19:24:56 (permalink)
    Worth a try.
    Some weeks ago, I was only getting core 15 if I didn't use advance methods.
     
    But then they were in flux.
     
    Let us know if it works. ;)
    #28
    Ranmacanada
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 992
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/09/22 10:44:47
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/10/27 19:40:14 (permalink)
    Well I heard some more coil whine coming from my PC, and it was another damn core 15.  Except this time my computer is using 290! watts.  What the hell.  These cores are murder on my card and my power bill.  I seriously can not take this core 15 crap.  I can't even be in the same room with my computer when these are going, and that's impossible as it's in my bedroom, and I kinda need to sleep there.

     

    ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)
    AMD Ryzen 2700
    Fold for the CURE!
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    EVGA 1080Ti Hybrid

    #29
    nicko79
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 2
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2013/11/21 20:20:18
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Upgraded Maxwell support for Core17 NOT Core 18 2014/11/03 09:33:23 (permalink)
    I am new to folding, Last month was my first month.  I noticed my two 970's making the awfull whine noise a few days ago and am noticing that I am getting core 15 after core 15 and not really earning much for them.
     
    Is this happening to everyone?  What is the Advanced method?  It is not worth the burn on my computer to continue to run these cores non stop.
    #30
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile