EVGA

project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT

Author
BadBertie
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 852
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/08/10 17:09:48
  • Location: France
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
2014/04/23 08:31:21 (permalink)
Anyone getting dodgy P9201s?
When sending results it throws Max Retries Reached and BAD_WORK_UNIT. There are some points but looks like I'm losing the qrb.

KTM Super Duke R EVO
#1

19 Replies Related Threads

    bison88
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 136
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2013/10/28 17:44:21
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/23 08:59:16 (permalink)
    I've only got one bad one since around 2PM yesterday on both GPU's.  Apparently on FF the faulty rate is much higher than normal and only the first two I did received bonus points the rest are just giving base at the moment.  I'd remove the beta tag or switch to advanced in the meantime while they fix these.
    #2
    yodap
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 4641
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/05/15 06:13:40
    • Location: NY, Upstate
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 8
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/23 11:10:26 (permalink)
    Well this kind of sucks doesn't it.
    I'm on the newest beta drivers and client-type beta and am getting nothing but these broken WU's.. If I switch to advanced, I don't get the latest 0.0.55 version of the core.
    The only thing to do is to switch back to 326.xx drivers and hope I don't get 8018's.
     
    Just another FAH snafu!


     

     
    #3
    Zagen30
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 528
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/11/27 12:21:01
    • Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/23 11:20:31 (permalink)
    You could try testing an idea I had but didn't think was necessary when I found out about the fixes- while the slot(s) are paused, replace the copy of core 17 in the non-beta folder with a copy of the beta version.  I'm not sure if WUs assigned via a non-beta flag will just use any copy of the core found in the non-beta core folders; there may be some code in the core itself that indicates it's a beta version.


     
    Core i7 3770K @4.3 GHz, 8 GB DDR3 @2133 MHz, 2xGTX 970 SSC @1379 MHz, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit    
     
    Affiliate code: K4BJ4FHUX5
     
    #4
    boballee
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1455
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/03/16 12:19:13
    • Location: Waiting for the Levee to Break at Bron-Yr-Aur
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 8
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/23 11:30:49 (permalink)
    I did get one bad work unit and two more that gave base points.  Unfortunately, I can't make any changes over to advanced - at least not right now.  Not going to try and do it remotely.  Will have to wait until I get home.  Oh well...



    #5
    yodap
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 4641
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/05/15 06:13:40
    • Location: NY, Upstate
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 8
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/23 12:13:06 (permalink)
    Zagen30
    You could try testing an idea I had but didn't think was necessary when I found out about the fixes- while the slot(s) are paused, replace the copy of core 17 in the non-beta folder with a copy of the beta version.  I'm not sure if WUs assigned via a non-beta flag will just use any copy of the core found in the non-beta core folders; there may be some code in the core itself that indicates it's a beta version.


    Sorry dude maybe next time. I got frustrated and deleted them, beta and all, and reverted to older drivers. GK104's are folding happy again.


     

     
    #6
    BadBertie
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 852
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/08/10 17:09:48
    • Location: France
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/23 13:13:21 (permalink)
    I've swapped to advanced flag (only change made) and picked up p13000 and p13001 giving around 75k ppd per slot (3 x ref 670s).
    Just checked of the 780 classy and found same problem there so switching flags on that rig too.

    KTM Super Duke R EVO
    #7
    BadBertie
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 852
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/08/10 17:09:48
    • Location: France
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/23 13:18:58 (permalink)
    I've swapped to advanced flag (only change made) and picked up p13000 and p13001 giving around 75k ppd per slot (3 x ref 670s).
    Just checked of the 780 classy and found same problem there so switching flags on that rig too.
    Sorry Central, let my eye off the ball for a second. Game face ON!

    KTM Super Duke R EVO
    #8
    BadBertie
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 852
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/08/10 17:09:48
    • Location: France
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/23 13:30:58 (permalink)
    Zagen30
    You could try testing an idea I had but didn't think was necessary when I found out about the fixes- while the slot(s) are paused, replace the copy of core 17 in the non-beta folder with a copy of the beta version.  I'm not sure if WUs assigned via a non-beta flag will just use any copy of the core found in the non-beta core folders; there may be some code in the core itself that indicates it's a beta version.

    Just tried that with the Classy. It pulled in a P13001 taking a bit of a hit at 120k ppd. But it didn't go and update the core file, seemed to run with the one I copied across from the beta folder.

    Sorry for the double post - fat thumbs
    post edited by BadBertie - 2014/04/23 13:34:12

    KTM Super Duke R EVO
    #9
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 38977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 282
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/23 20:10:19 (permalink)
    That is the only project I am getting now for over 24 Hours.
    It is quick less than 2 to 3 hours
    Summary 
    Status Progress Name TPF PPD ETA Core ID Project (Run, Clone, Gen) Credit
    Running 16% Foldit 3 x GTX 780 Slot 00 00:01:44 151470.8 (8.308 WUs) 02:25:36 17 P9201 (R750, C0, G0) 18232.6
    Running 15% Foldit 3 x GTX 780 Slot 01 00:02:35 83241.9 (5.574 WUs) 03:39:35 17 P9201 (R766, C0, G0) 14933.4
    Running 82% Foldit 3 x GTX 780 Slot 02 00:01:30 187284.5 (9.6 WUs) 00:27:00 17 P9201 (R736, C0, G0) 19508.8

     
    But I do only see 12000 or 8000 credits per card.
    post edited by bcavnaugh - 2014/04/24 07:25:26

    Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


     
    #10
    codebluetoo
    iCX Member
    • Total Posts : 421
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/01/30 22:54:13
    • Location: Earthquake bunker, Vancouver Island, BC
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/23 20:17:49 (permalink)
    I have 3 of these too, on all my GPUs (2 x 680 1 x 660).  Seems to hang FAH occasionally to never mind the low PPD.  Geeeeeeze...


     
      Folding 4 Life 

        

      


    #11
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 38977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 282
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/24 15:12:25 (permalink)
    5,920 Credits now on a GTX 780 and now seeing more Max Retries Reached and BAD_WORK_UNIT and so far I have not received any QRB

    Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


     
    #12
    bison88
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 136
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2013/10/28 17:44:21
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/24 15:41:24 (permalink)
    bcavnaugh
    5,920 Credits now on a GTX 780 and now seeing more Max Retries Reached and BAD_WORK_UNIT and so far I have not received any QRB


     
    https://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=26223&start=15#p263254


    They are saying its fixed now so maybe it'll take effect from here on out?
    #13
    Macaholic
    iCX Member
    • Total Posts : 338
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/08/18 18:07:59
    • Location: 1 Infinite Loop
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 2
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/24 17:31:00 (permalink)
    bcavnaugh
    5,920 Credits now on a GTX 780 and now seeing more Max Retries Reached and BAD_WORK_UNIT and so far I have not received any QRB


    As far as I can tell you are getting your QRB since the fix;

    Your WU (P9201 R431 C0 G0) was added to the stats database on 2014-04-24 15:02:53 for 17104 points of credit.
    Your WU (P9201 R81 C1 G0) was added to the stats database on 2014-04-24 16:02:49 for 16624 points of credit.
    Your WU (P9201 R219 C0 G0) was added to the stats database on 2014-04-24 17:02:50 for 14232 points of credit.

    Fold! It does a body good!™
    Mac Pro Dual Quad Core X5570 - 2 x Mac Pro Dual Quad Core X5365 - 2 x Asus Z8NA-D6C, Dual Hex Core E5645 - Supermicro H8QGi-F-O, Quad 12-Core Opteron 6174 - Supermicro H8QGi-F-O, Quad 16-Core Opteron 6272 - Tyan S8812, Quad 12-Core Opteron 6166HE - Supermicro H8QGi-F-O, Quad 12-Core Opteron 6164HE - 5 x EVGA Classified GeForce GTX 590


    #14
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 38977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 282
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/24 21:50:38 (permalink)
    Macaholic
    bcavnaugh
    5,920 Credits now on a GTX 780 and now seeing more Max Retries Reached and BAD_WORK_UNIT and so far I have not received any QRB


    As far as I can tell you are getting your QRB since the fix;

    Your WU (P9201 R431 C0 G0) was added to the stats database on 2014-04-24 15:02:53 for 17104 points of credit.
    Your WU (P9201 R81 C1 G0) was added to the stats database on 2014-04-24 16:02:49 for 16624 points of credit.
    Your WU (P9201 R219 C0 G0) was added to the stats database on 2014-04-24 17:02:50 for 14232 points of credit.


    Yes, and thank you for your support in this mater.

    Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


     
    #15
    BadBertie
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 852
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/08/10 17:09:48
    • Location: France
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/25 11:16:55 (permalink)
    Hmm I restarted on the P9201s since the "fix" but I'm still not getting a qrb.
    Can you please verify if there is anything required our end, such as updating core files in order to get the qrb running again?

    KTM Super Duke R EVO
    #16
    boballee
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1455
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/03/16 12:19:13
    • Location: Waiting for the Levee to Break at Bron-Yr-Aur
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 8
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/25 11:22:12 (permalink)
    I, unfortunately, wasn't able to make any changes to my rig and went through the day yesterday without the QRB, however, from last night on, it appears I've been getting them - and I haven't changed anything on my rig.  So I don't think there is anything on the user side - but that's just a guess.
     
     

    Attached Image(s)




    #17
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 38977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 282
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/25 11:45:26 (permalink)
     Sometime I works and other time QRB is not working, but it is Beta.
     37,140 then 8,000 then 32,072
     
     

    Attached Image(s)


    Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


     
    #18
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 38977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 282
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/25 15:43:03 (permalink)
    Looks like our FAH Banners are down.
     
    Update on R2 290X and P9101
    20:23:55:WARNING:WU01:FS01:FahCore returned an unknown error code which probably indicates that it crashed
    20:23:55:WARNING:WU01:FS01:FahCore returned: UNKNOWN_ENUM (127 = 0x7f)
    One did complete but the last one is taking a very Long time to run both started at the same time and this last one still needs 3 more hours to complete.
     
    Status Progress Name TPF PPD ETA Core Core ID Project (Run, Clone, Gen) Credit
    Paused 0% LCS R9 290X Slot 00 00:00:00 0 (0 WUs) 00:00:00 Unknown Unknown P0 (R0, C0, G0) 0
    Finishing 58% LCS R9 290X Slot 01 00:04:31 38319.4 (3.188 WUs) 03:09:42 ZETA 17 P9201 (R617, C1, G0) 12019.2


    Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


     
    #19
    bcavnaugh
    The Crunchinator
    • Total Posts : 38977
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
    • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 282
    Re: project 9201 BAD_WORK_UNIT 2014/04/26 08:35:38 (permalink)
    I would go back to client-type = advanced and the both pulled P9101(Version 0.0.52) MUCH Better then P9102 Beta on NVIDIA and AMD GPU's
    (On New Cards that is). Then after the TZC users can go back to Beta (Testing) I know this is no help for Non GK110 GPUs.
     
    Two GTX 780  PPD 276625.7  Credit  55367.4
    to the
    Two R9 290X PPD 357023.7  Credit  50583.5
     
    Progress Name TPF PPD WUs ETA Core ID Project (Run, Clone, Gen) Credit 18% LCS R9 290X Slot 00 00:02:13 180385 6.496 03:01:46 ZETA 17 P9101 (R901, C0, G38) 27767.6 18% LCS R9 290X Slot 01 00:02:15 176638.7 6.4 03:04:30 ZETA 17 P9101 (R975, C0, G30) 27599.8   Totals 357023.7 12.896 Totals 55367.4 15% GTX 780 Slot 00 00:02:37 139674.6 5.503 03:42:25 ZETA 17 P9101 (R508, C0, G55) 25380.7 21% GTX 780 Slot 02 00:02:39 136951.1 5.434 03:29:21 ZETA 17 P9101 (R96, C0, G30) 25202.8   Totals 276625.7 10.937 Totals 50583.5  AMD WINS OUT Deff: 80398 Deff: 4783.9

    post edited by bcavnaugh - 2014/04/26 09:44:27

    Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


     
    #20
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile