@ awalleyeguy... Your Vcore is 1.65v?  How did you get those temps with 45*f room temps?
 
BTW... that is one sweet case you have there... how many radiators could you put in that if you wanted to max it out?  I think that would be nice for my TEC water chillers which need a lot of heat removal for the hotsides of the TECs!

johnksss

that ambient temp is like gold apparently!!!..to bad my room is about 100 f right now...lol

I think Elvis is in the room.. not next door.. LOL!

That is one cold arse room.  About 7*C.  I had my chip, of the same batch, running 4.62 ghz but gave up as it kept shutting down half way thru the test as I was only running 1.38-1.4v to it.  My ambient temps were about 0*C.  Could have gave it more volts but ran out of time.  Going to have to get back at it I see as I am liking what you have going on.  I believe the B027's are the best 920's out there with the B026's coming in a tight 2nd place.  Either way they are both great batches.

Personally, I always said his chip is pure gold.  It's been proven again here.  Raja tested this chip way back with some amazing results.

awalleyeguy

It was. But today just a cool room (45F), no outside air. Thank you sir.

Wow, that's one cold room!!   I can see you right now, staring a computer screen covered in icicles, lol.

The only way I can get a room temp of 5-6C is if I move my room into the freezer!

Hmm, so VDroop actually  lowered your temps. This is very interesting because I never would have thought it mattered. I always assumed that if you need X amount of voltage under full load, it didn't really matter how you got there (down with VDroop, or up without VDroop), just as long as you got there.

In other words, I've always though something like 1.50V would have the same core temp with or without VDroop, and the only thing that would be different would be the idle temps because those voltages would be completely different with and without VDroop.

I see, so VDroop is a little bit "smarter" than what we previously thought. It's almost sort of a modified Auto setting, if you will.

I'm going to definitely try this out. I'll certainly try anything to get load temps down, that's for sure.

We have run some tests with the program LinX 4 core 4 thread. This is in no way trying to show how stable our processor is with this program. We do not have hours and hours to run this stability test just to satisfy a few people in the forums. What we do want to show is the heat removal capacity of our modded OCZ unit. There was a post in the beginning of the thread of a screen shot of a W3540 @ 4.818 @ 1.41 volts. This individual stated he had a custom built phase unit from someone over at XS and that it was calibrated to 220 watts of heat removal. His average running temps @ 4.818 @ 1.41 volts was in the mid 30c rang with a peak of 34c. We have set our i7-975 to the same clocks but with much more voltage than he was running. All and all we feel that the test results we are posting should be creating more heat than his run at the settings he listed. We like to show temps with Everest for it can show the rise and level off of temps throughout the test. We have also run Real temp for that seems to be the program used throughout this thread. As you can sfies some of the skeptics here slamming our modded unit.
 
Oil change allows the use of different refrigerants, hence our blend of three gases works well. 

Link listed below of test runs with temp.....
<a href="http://s1006.photobucket.com/albums/af190/cbgpcs/?action=view&current=2.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1006.photobucket.com/albums/af190/cbgpcs/2.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

No picture

Like I said we are not trying to prove stability just heat removal..........

expedision

I will post it for him, but it's only 2 passes :(
 

 
I think he want's to show the stability of the phase temps... not his chip.   He's running more voltage at the same clock with the same temps.... only two passes but you can see the temps are not running away.
 
CBGPCS OZC Phase 

  
  

 
Custom built phase
 
 

 

johnksss

well let me know how yours works oc333, but with everything enabled. since im not running 4/4 im running 4/8

 
To be quite honest... LinX is very buggy with HT on as well noted... but I will do it.  I can't tell you how many times it has run 19 passes with no problems only to crash when the 20th pass completes.... a real pain.   I'm pretty sure it will rock as CBGPCS is running some decent voltage there... my temps at that speed were in the 60*c range... at 30*c it should do very well.

yeah, join the club!..grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

but that's not what im after..

that's about an hour of run time and im more about the temps it held during that time. ok..it failed at the end..no biggie...but your temps held fast. which is really more important in the end..right guys?

yeah...like all of a sudden...the cpu doesn't have enough power to say...."im done"