Since you aren't even pretending to listen to player feedback there's no point in having an section of the forum dedicated to the gaming community. Just put whatever new rule in the gaming section.

Which feedback are you referring to? Your complaint about admins crouching over a dead body... oh that's right they listened to that and it's no longer allowed. Oh wait you must mean where admins balanced teams... no that can't be it because that's not allowed now either. Hmmm what could you be talking about?

sinned.
Which feedback are you referring to? Your complaint about admins crouching over a dead body... oh that's right they listened to that and it's no longer allowed. Oh wait you must mean where admins balanced teams... no that can't be it because that's not allowed now either. Hmmm what could you be talking about?

The feed back like see what the community thinks before adding a new server rule that affects game play, or how about making the servers fun again, where players don't have to worry about admins nitpicking everything they say.  Funny how from 2008-2014 the community was more active on the servers, during the same time, admins didn't nitpick at players. The community got along with each other. Even you have to admit, during BFBC2,BF3 and start of BF4, the servers were a lot more fun to play on, we had a lot more community involvement on them too.
 
Arctic is right about closing EGC section. EVGA gaming is not about EGC anymore from what i have seen, the community doesn't have any say about the servers rules that affect gameplay.  One person that rarely played on the server complains about Mobile AA on one BF4 map, instead of seeing what the community thinks, what did we see EVGA do, they just made up a new rule. If that doesn't show that EVGA no longer cares what the community thinks, nothing will.
 

Objectivity is a problem for those 'in power'. I can't say that is the case here, as I don't use the eVGA servers, but I do know
that people tend to have 'favorites' and play towards them in resolving issues.
 
Things like this need to be "Business is business, and even though you're a friend, if I fire you, it's nothing personal, it is
business".
 
 

ARCTIC_EAGLE

EVGATech_JoeyC
family safe

Why is a server for a game rated M, 17+, being made into a "family safe/safe space"? If this was TF2 I could understand it. But Battlefield 4 is a game that has characters cussing, extreme violence, it glamorizes war, etc. Why are you trying to impose a E rating in a game server for a game that has a M rating?

Well we did just have someone complain about an admin crouching in game that made them feel uncomfortable.  You would think someone playing a M rated game wouldn't care about that.  But unfortunately they must cater to everyone (even the immature) since they are a buisness.

The only issue I would ever be wary of is an admin kicking someone who is winning, which is making the team the admin is on [lose]. Can't prove they're doing it, and can't prove that they're not doing it... .
And nobody can prove it otherwise from either side.

ARCTIC_EAGLE

stalinx20
The only issue I would ever be wary of is an admin kicking someone who is winning, which is making the team the admin is on [lose]. Can't prove they're doing it, and can't prove that they're not doing it... .
And nobody can prove it otherwise from either side.

There is an admin who started banning people from a certain clan because they kicked him out of their teamspeak, so I don't doubt your accusation.

May we see the screen shots of this?  Because if this is true, then I'm sure AT LEAST one of them would have taken a screen shot for being banned for no reason.

ARCTIC_EAGLE

Towlie420

ARCTIC_EAGLE

stalinx20
The only issue I would ever be wary of is an admin kicking someone who is winning, which is making the team the admin is on [lose]. Can't prove they're doing it, and can't prove that they're not doing it... .
And nobody can prove it otherwise from either side.

There is an admin who started banning people from a certain clan because they kicked him out of their teamspeak, so I don't doubt your accusation.

May we see the screen shots of this?  Because if this is true, then I'm sure AT LEAST one of them would have taken a screen shot for being banned for no reason.

There's an entire thread about it, go find it if you care that much.

I know exactly what you're talking about Arctic-Eagle. It is out there for everyone to read.

stalinx20

ARCTIC_EAGLE

Towlie420

ARCTIC_EAGLE

stalinx20
The only issue I would ever be wary of is an admin kicking someone who is winning, which is making the team the admin is on [lose]. Can't prove they're doing it, and can't prove that they're not doing it... .
And nobody can prove it otherwise from either side.

There is an admin who started banning people from a certain clan because they kicked him out of their teamspeak, so I don't doubt your accusation.

May we see the screen shots of this?  Because if this is true, then I'm sure AT LEAST one of them would have taken a screen shot for being banned for no reason.

There's an entire thread about it, go find it if you care that much.

I know exactly what you're talking about Arctic-Eagle. It is out there for everyone to read.

Just searched and found nothing about an admin banning people from a certain clan.  So where is this evidence?

stalinx20

Stormfirebird
The majority of them got banned for baserape.
Thx for bringing that up because its a nice story of admins actually doing their work.

Just to clarify, my post was a general statement to where you cannot prove, nor can you prove, that an admin would kick a player that is on the opposing team that was winning, making the losing team, which the admin is on, lose.
 
To me that looks to be a loop hole that any admin may be able to get away with.

Actually it's easy to tell if the person got kicked reasonably with a recorded chat log which it looks like they have from other threads.  The person in question can ask for said chat logs and see why they got kicked/banned.

It's actually really easy to prove corruptness with evidence; which if he did do that, he would have left evidence to show.  And if the admins were truly doing this, I'm sure it would have been brought up by now with plenty of proof.

MSim
You can ask all day long for server logs, that doesn't mean you will receive them.  I was refused server logs from when an unknown server admin accused me of "acting like an admin" when i wasn't.  I was told "we can't share server chat logs" because they didn't want me to know which admin said it.

http://forums.evga.com/FindPost/2463613
 
This post right here shows that hey do share the server chat logs.

Towlie420
It's actually really easy to prove corruptness with evidence; which if he did do that, he would have left evidence to show.  And if the admins were truly doing this, I'm sure it would have been brought up by now with plenty of proof.

There is no way that you can prove that an admin would/could do such a thing. That is my point. And during an event...? Oh boy that's scary. WHen the victim who was kicked on "accident" tries to come back in, I pray his spot is still available...
 
The only "evidence" that it would show was the admin kicked the user.... by mistake.
 
"Oh, I am so sorry that I kicked you. It was a complete 'accident', and clearly it was the wrong person..."
 
Towlie, I find it a little weird that you are defending this. Just saying...
 
 

Im pretty sure its just hypothetically, but if something like that were to happen more often it wouldnt go unnoticed.