JeffreyHam

A BR for Bob, please.

http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?m=841234

Good find

Any chance of putting one my way? 
 
http://forums.evga.com/fb.ashx?m=842616

*ahem* http://forums.evga.com/fb.ashx?m=847657

EVGAweb_ShaneD helped me.
http://forums.evga.com/fb.ashx?m=841275

 
 Post #15      http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?m=854743&mpage=1#858825

XrayMan

 
Post #15      http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?m=854743&mpage=1#858825

Afterburner

XrayMan


Post #15      http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?m=854743&mpage=1#858825

flyinion

I'm sure I will, I'm tempted to do a step up in the next few months to a 570 though lol.  /sigh we'll see.  Anyone know if EVGA bucks can be used on a step-up?

Nope!
 
Question / Issue  Can EVGA bucks be used towards a stepup?  

Answer / Solution   EVGA bucks can only be used towards new purchases from the EVGA.com website.  EVGA bucks can not be used toward the step-up program or other EVGA promotional programs.
 
 
______________________________________________________________________________________
Not good enough for a BR I guess!    :(

Halo_003

lol Xray you noob! You linked to post 17, not 15.

http://forums.evga.com/fb.ashx?m=857407

Oooops! LOL! He could have scrolled up to post 15.   :P
 
Fixed>   http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?m=854743                

I doubt you're being ignored, but do you really think that is a BR worthy post? You answered a simple question, nothing technical, nothing difficult.
 
Hell, if I wanted a BR for every simple question I answered, I'd have thousands of them. Outside of a milestone or other momentus occasions, BR's should be earned for answering technical questions, or by spending some time with a member to help solve their issue or overclock...ect. I see them being given out here willy nilly and it's somewhat surprising to me to see what posts have been awarded a BR lately. I have to walk on hot coals to get my BR's by comparison to what I've seen them awarded here.......

I'll go ahead and give you one for the second link because you actually answered his question instead of quoting something that was already posted on the forums.  The others were questions that they could have answered themselves by reading the policies regarding their particular questions.
 
The next one is gonna be more difficult!  

XrayMan

CraptacularOne

I doubt you're being ignored, but do you really think that is a BR worth post? You answered a simple question, nothing technical, nothing difficult.

Ok, here's 2 more then:>

http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?m=858334

http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?high=&m=858788&mpage=1#858946

 
Nothing really there bud. Let me show you what I have to post to earn BR's lately to give you an idea......
 

AB, when running Surround all 3 monitors are treated as one single large display. Even if you have 3 monitors and 3 cards, it doesn't work out that each card is rendering only what's on that monitor the card is plugged into. The drivers treat the Surround group as a single screen. It in essence works the same way Tri SLI works on a single screen. Each card renders one complete image in sequence just like in single screen. The only difference is that in Surround the card rendering the image splits up it's displayed image to the other cards to synchronize the display.
 
For instance in Tri SLI lets take card one for instance. it renders it's frame for the complete image for all 3 screens. Now lets say card 1 is hooked up to the center monitor. What it does is it sends the rest of the image it rendered for the surrounding monitors to the other cards to be displayed at the same time it displays its image. Then the cycle continues with card 2. It renders it's complete image and for examples sake we'll say card 2 is hooked to the left monitor. So it then sends the image for the center and right monitor to display in sync with the image it's displaying. And so on an so forth.
 
This is why it's so critical for monitors to share the same native refresh rate and sync polarity for Surround to work. The cards are not just merely rendering the images for the monitor they are hooked up to. Behind the scenes there is a precision timed and wholly dependent on synchronization and communication between the cards and monitors to acheive the Surround effect.

 
Quite a bit more involved wouldn't you say?

Tweaked

I'll go ahead and give you one for the second link because you actually answered his question instead of quoting something that was already posted on the forums.  The others were questions that they could have answered themselves by reading the policies regarding their particular questions.

The next one is gonna be more difficult!  

Thanks Tweaked! Appreciate it.      

CraptacularOne

XrayMan

CraptacularOne

I doubt you're being ignored, but do you really think that is a BR worth post? You answered a simple question, nothing technical, nothing difficult.

Ok, here's 2 more then:>

http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?m=858334

http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?high=&m=858788&mpage=1#858946

Nothing really there bud. Let me show you what I have to post to earn BR's lately to give you an idea......

AB, when running Surround all 3 monitors are treated as one single large display. Even if you have 3 monitors and 3 cards, it doesn't work out that each card is rendering only what's on that monitor the card is plugged into. The drivers treat the Surround group as a single screen. It in essence works the same way Tri SLI works on a single screen. Each card renders one complete image in sequence just like in single screen. The only difference is that in Surround the card rendering the image splits up it's displayed image to the other cards to synchronize the display.

For instance in Tri SLI lets take card one for instance. it renders it's frame for the complete image for all 3 screens. Now lets say card 1 is hooked up to the center monitor. What it does is it sends the rest of the image it rendered for the surrounding monitors to the other cards to be displayed at the same time it displays its image. Then the cycle continues with card 2. It renders it's complete image and for examples sake we'll say card 2 is hooked to the left monitor. So it then sends the image for the center and right monitor to display in sync with the image it's displaying. And so on an so forth.

This is why it's so critical for monitors to share the same native refresh rate and sync polarity for Surround to work. The cards are not just merely rendering the images for the monitor they are hooked up to. Behind the scenes there is a precision timed and wholly dependent on synchronization and communication between the cards and monitors to acheive the Surround effect.

Quite a bit more involved wouldn't you say?

Your a hard man to get a BR out of. LOL!       :P
Also, yes your posts are very detailed, and informative. If they gave you a BR for all the times you helped here, they would run out of BR's.    :)

Hypn0t1q79

Tweaked

Hypn0t1q79

Bah theres been soo much hostility on the forums for some time now...... whats going on people. when i joined it used to be a fun time everytime i logged in now i can get through a thread without someone going at someone else.....

The forums ride in waves.  I have a feeling that very soon things are gonna return to normal.  Have faith.

i have faith its just not really a fun time to log in annd go oh lets see whos arguing with who now. sadly it seems sooner or later anything im a part of goes to crap lol...... Lets all hope it turns better soon.

oh and sorry for the ranting in the BR thread im kinda not all here atm feel free to remove it if you feel its not needed.

Have a good night

Who's arguing?

CraptacularOne

Tweaked

I'll go ahead and give you one for the second link because you actually answered his question instead of quoting something that was already posted on the forums.  The others were questions that they could have answered themselves by reading the policies regarding their particular questions.

The next one is gonna be more difficult!  

Really?

So can I post and ask for a BR every time I answer a question regardless of technical level? I have to run a marathon while breathing through a straw and hopping on one foot to earn BR's compared to what I've seen here.......

 
This was an exercise in positive re-enforcement.  By awarding that BR and then expressing that the next one would be harder, I am endeavoring to push people to better and better things by giving them a reward for trying to help.  Am I only supposed to award BR's to people who have Masters Degree's in computer science?  Or do I award peoples efforts and encourage them to keep learning and thus improve the level of help they offer?  If people are never rewarded for their efforts, they stop trying.