Helpful Reply2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements

Page: << < ..1112131415.. > >> Showing page 11 of 30
Author
Gratuitous
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1122
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/03/16 04:30:23
  • Location: California
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 4
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 16:39:55 (permalink)
I think its fair, but the math needs to be transperent to all of us so we can push it to the bleeding edge. ballance is always a tough one. the reason we should know the math is though so that when we exceed our comfort levels we need to know what we are getting for it, especially with electricity prices as high as they are.

“I built a castle in the swamp and it sunk. I built a second castle and it sunk too. I built a third castle and it burned down and then sunk. But the fourth castle, Ahhhh! That one stood.”
—Monty Python and the Holy Grail
 
Xavier Zepherious
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 4632
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/07/04 12:53:39
  • Location: Medicine Hat ,Alberta, Canada
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 15
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 16:47:02 (permalink)
this is the way it was done last year AB
 
you can still receive contest points for any folding points past a certain point(like up to 10 or 20% more than you projected)
than after that you only receive about 1/2
 
every team is under it...so it's fair
 
 

 
   


Primes found        Affiliate Code:YN2AHK39LH
 
 
drougnor
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 2196
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2006/07/18 05:57:59
  • Location: Waterville, ME, USA
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 14
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 16:50:13 (permalink)
I just want to know how anything in the standings has changed, beyond points awarded, to warrant the accusation that winners are being picked by the system?
 
I had access to the testing that Troy did before he put the system 'live', and the rankings are unchanged.  All he has done is to ensure that some folders who had reported numbers that were FAR lower than they are producing currently are not unbalancing the contest unfairly.
 
To that point, I've already told him that if I somehow come into the unexpected ability to suddenly out perform my reported ability that I fully EXPECTED him to penalize my overall points production in order to make it more fair for the other teams. 
 
But, you already clearly stated that you didn't want to discuss this, so I'll leave it at that, as well as leaving this here:
 
From the contest page
  • (Preliminary) Contestant Adjustment Point System
    • To insure the contest is as competitive as possible, an individual contestants ability to exceed their anticipated contest points will depend on several factors including (margin of deviation, team's performance, and other team's performance).
    • If a number of criteria are met, the contestant will only receive partial credit if they cross a certain threshold.
    • Contestants will never lose contest points for exceeding their projected folding points.  All points and work units produced will improve the contestant's and team's contest points.
    • The system will be sensitive to the unpredictable nature of folding.
    • All contestants will be subject to the exact same criteria.
    • Bottom line: the best way to insure a fair and competitive contest is to give as accurate a prediction as possible and fold as hard as you can throughout the competition.
 


Gratuitous
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1122
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/03/16 04:30:23
  • Location: California
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 4
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 16:51:46 (permalink)
Xavier Zepherious

this is the way it was done last year AB

you can still receive contest points for any folding points past a certain point(like up to 10 or 20% more than you projected)
than after that you only receive about 1/2

every team is under it...so it's fair




this math is too ambiguous. I need real numbers. I need to calculate my cost per point and be able to decide how much I am willing to pay for the extra point. make sense?
 
edit: I have committed to 1380 points. this costs me aproximatly 70 cents per point. if I descide I want to try for 2760 points this month. then If I have to spend 3 times as much money or 210 cents per point past the prommised 1380. well I cant afford that, so I need to know exactly what math is involved here so I can make a responsable decision without trial and error.
post edited by Gratuitous - 2012/03/03 17:20:26

“I built a castle in the swamp and it sunk. I built a second castle and it sunk too. I built a third castle and it burned down and then sunk. But the fourth castle, Ahhhh! That one stood.”
—Monty Python and the Holy Grail
 
troy8d
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 2185
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/10/16 08:10:22
  • Status: online
  • Ribbons : 10
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 16:55:04 (permalink)
Afterburner
meh...



 
 
So you advocate a system where the optimal strategy is to misrepresent your points prior to the contest and then completely blow it away once the contest starts.  Hmm...if we wanted randomize teams we would have done that from the outset.  The way things are set now, the optimal strategy is to give an accurate estimate of your production, and then do the best you can in the contest period.
 
Furthermore, those that read the details of the scoring system knew it was a possibility.  While ideally I would prefer it would not have to be used at all, there was a minority of overproducing individuals that were distorting the scoring system.  Ultimately, it is a tradeoff between a encouraging people to fold more and a contest that is slightly competitive.  The compromise is somewhere in the middle, with plenty of leeway for anyone to expand their folding, but limited beyond a point that would grant an extraordinarily unfair advantage to a single individual or team.  In fact, there is not a "hard" cutoff beyond which anyone is penalized. 
 
As was mentioned, the system is not finalized and in fact may not be used at all pending the results of the captains vote.  It can be made more stringent, or less stringent.  In reality we should have waited longer for the numbers to shake out, but I thought it was better to get it out there sooner so people aren't flying blind and don't feel deceived.  Hopefully the 48 hours window didn't inconvenience you too much.
 
Afterburner
What a joke. If you already knew who was going to win because of how the production was going to be. Why have a contest...

 
I am just confused by this.  We don't know the production going forward, and if we did the way the contest is designed things would end in an 8 way tie.  A small minority of people are effected this, the majority are completely unaffected.


troy8d
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 2185
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/10/16 08:10:22
  • Status: online
  • Ribbons : 10
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 16:56:19 (permalink)
Gratuitous

I think its fair, but the math needs to be transperent to all of us so we can push it to the bleeding edge. ballance is always a tough one. the reason we should know the math is though so that when we exceed our comfort levels we need to know what we are getting for it, especially with electricity prices as high as they are.

 
It will be forthcoming shortly.


troy8d
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 2185
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/10/16 08:10:22
  • Status: online
  • Ribbons : 10
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 16:57:51 (permalink)
Xavier Zepherious

this is the way it was done last year AB

you can still receive contest points for any folding points past a certain point(like up to 10 or 20% more than you projected)
than after that you only receive about 1/2

every team is under it...so it's fair



 
This is not the way it was done last year for folding m@dness, but if we are always striving to improve things.  If this does not make things better off, we will quickly remove it.
 
Also, this is not an accurate representation of the system.


-ZS-Carpenter
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1547
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/03/07 15:08:55
  • Location: My Affiliate Code: 6VBFZ0I9GZ
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 2
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 16:59:15 (permalink)
Wow, another contest that is full of crying because the organizers are trying to keep some sense of balance and fairness so all teams have a chance......
 
This will be the last folding contest I will be in. Even though it is a lot of fun and the donations for prizes are great I can no longer deal with the childish crying some people bring.
 
Huge thanks to all the organizers for all the hard work you put into this. I hope you have thick enough skin to let the excrement you get flung at you to slide off your backs.

 
 
 
Main rig: gaming/folding
Z68 FTW 2600k@4.2  980 Ti sc+
Dedicated folders
x79 Classy/4820k 3x 970
Q9550/780i 2x 770
troy8d
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 2185
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/10/16 08:10:22
  • Status: online
  • Ribbons : 10
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:00:40 (permalink)
Gratuitous

Xavier Zepherious

this is the way it was done last year AB

you can still receive contest points for any folding points past a certain point(like up to 10 or 20% more than you projected)
than after that you only receive about 1/2

every team is under it...so it's fair




this math is too ambiguous. I need real numbers. I need to calculate my cost per point and be able to decide how much I am willing to pay for the extra point. make sense?

 
If you're looking for hard and fast numbers, you might be disappointed.


Gratuitous
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1122
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/03/16 04:30:23
  • Location: California
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 4
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:05:31 (permalink)
troy8d

Gratuitous

Xavier Zepherious

this is the way it was done last year AB

you can still receive contest points for any folding points past a certain point(like up to 10 or 20% more than you projected)
than after that you only receive about 1/2

every team is under it...so it's fair




this math is too ambiguous. I need real numbers. I need to calculate my cost per point and be able to decide how much I am willing to pay for the extra point. make sense?


If you're looking for hard and fast numbers, you might be disappointed.

this was my edit and reason above:
edit: I have committed to 1380 points. this costs me aproximatly 70 cents per point. if I descide I want to try for 2760 points this month. then If I have to spend 3 times as much money or 210 cents per point past the prommised 1380. well I cant afford that, so I need to know exactly what math is involved here so I can make a responsable decision without trial and error.
if you just are sorta guessing at it then I can work with that as well:) man, I love what you have put into this and the whole enchelada. just want transperancy. anyway, keep up the good work. its all for a good cause.
post edited by Gratuitous - 2012/03/03 17:19:57

“I built a castle in the swamp and it sunk. I built a second castle and it sunk too. I built a third castle and it burned down and then sunk. But the fourth castle, Ahhhh! That one stood.”
—Monty Python and the Holy Grail
 
Opolis
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1688
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/03/25 18:49:16
  • Status: online
  • Ribbons : 7
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:05:53 (permalink)
Troy8d, I appreciate your efforts to keep things fair.  I thought everyone was aware of receiving slightly less contest points for blowing away their estimates, it was made clear to predict ppd as accurately as possible.

           
        
Afterburner
EVGA Forum Moderator
  • Total Posts : 24945
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 14:41:48
  • Location: It's... Classified Yeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaah........
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 108
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:06:30 (permalink)
drougnor

I just want to know how anything in the standings has changed, beyond points awarded, to warrant the accusation that winners are being picked by the system?

I had access to the testing that Troy did before he put the system 'live', and the rankings are unchanged.  All he has done is to ensure that some folders who had reported numbers that were FAR lower than they are producing currently are not unbalancing the contest unfairly.

To that point, I've already told him that if I somehow come into the unexpected ability to suddenly out perform my reported ability that I fully EXPECTED him to penalize my overall points production in order to make it more fair for the other teams. 

But, you already clearly stated that you didn't want to discuss this, so I'll leave it at that, as well as leaving this here:

From the contest page
  • (Preliminary) Contestant Adjustment Point System
    • To insure the contest is as competitive as possible, an individual contestants ability to exceed their anticipated contest points will depend on several factors including (margin of deviation, team's performance, and other team's performance).
    • If a number of criteria are met, the contestant will only receive partial credit if they cross a certain threshold.
    • Contestants will never lose contest points for exceeding their projected folding points All points and work units produced will improve the contestant's and team's contest points.
    • The system will be sensitive to the unpredictable nature of folding.
    • All contestants will be subject to the exact same criteria.
    • Bottom line: the best way to insure a fair and competitive contest is to give as accurate a prediction as possible and fold as hard as you can throughout the competition.
 

I think you are taking my choice personal Your highlighted portion... And you may want to read my post again. I did not clearly say I did not want to discuss it... I said... Do not send me a PM. Do not try and reason with me. I am not upset. It is a choice I am making as this change has happened.
 
This is kind of easy to me....
 
  • Member X claims 25k
  • Member X Does 35k
  • Member X is deducted a mathematical number to reduce 35k back to 25k.
Now...
  • All team now are producing numbers as protected. = Winner was already known before contest as a member did the balancing of the players and the teams and the points change.
 
That is why I think what I said. It is not a big deal at all. Quite the opposite. I am just making a personal choice, just like I did to add production as I got into the fun. Now no one complained or offered disapproval for wanting to do more. Yet because I chose to go back to what I originally predicted I am the bad guy?
 
I just goofed. it is my mistake. I read everything before we started, and did not see anything about 2012 saying we would have points reduced to meet the original production.
 
I feel horrible knowing I hurt our team. As I know I cannot keep up the production as I am during the weekends during the week. So no matter what, I am hurting the team.
 

 
  ***EDIT***
 
  Man I forgot to post this question earlier when responding to you. Please note my interpretation may not be as it is intended.
 
I read these before hand. Note the highlighted portion. Nowhere does it say points will only be awarded partially. It also says we will never lose any points. I did. And why I feel I goofed...
 
Yet I feel some approaches/responses by a few here to my mistake as being a bit harsh... It is right there in black and white... We will never lose any of the Contest points... Well I did.. I had over 60 around 6am Pacific and now I have just over 40...
 
It does not say Production points or just points... It says Contest Points...
 
So I hope you understand my take on this. I understood it a bit different is all. Does that make since?
post edited by Afterburner - 2012/03/03 18:26:29
Afterburner
EVGA Forum Moderator
  • Total Posts : 24945
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 14:41:48
  • Location: It's... Classified Yeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaah........
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 108
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:07:51 (permalink)
-ZS-Carpenter

Wow, another contest that is full of crying because the organizers are trying to keep some sense of balance and fairness so all teams have a chance......

This will be the last folding contest I will be in. Even though it is a lot of fun and the donations for prizes are great I can no longer deal with the childish crying some people bring.

Huge thanks to all the organizers for all the hard work you put into this. I hope you have thick enough skin to let the excrement you get flung at you to slide off your backs.

Please read my other post... I think it makes my position clearer...
diplomacy
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 198
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/12/11 07:46:12
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:15:29 (permalink)
i agree that the whining is not good and would like to take the opportunity to remind everyone that the primary goal of this competition is to get us to 700M points. this is a friendly competition and as such, we should be cheering each other on.
 
the powers are doing their best to make the contest competitive. allowing 1 person to hold the contest hostage while everyone else who was accurate is punished for it is not a superior solution by my calculation.

ASUS P9x79 Pro with Intel I7 3930k 4.2 Ghz, Dual EVGA GTX 580s SLI
I use Bionic to help save the world while I'm sleeping, watching TV, or pretty much doing anything but gaming on my PC.
 
Afterburner
EVGA Forum Moderator
  • Total Posts : 24945
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 14:41:48
  • Location: It's... Classified Yeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaah........
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 108
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:19:03 (permalink)
diplomacy

i agree that the whining is not good and would like to take the opportunity to remind everyone that the primary goal of this competition is to get us to 700M points. this is a friendly competition and as such, we should be cheering each other on.

the powers are doing their best to make the contest competitive. allowing 1 person to hold the contest hostage while everyone else who was accurate is punished for it is not a superior solution by my calculation.

Do what? Troy clearly said this was open to discussion How is a member who has made a choice to do as originally planned holding this hostage? I goofed, no one else. I just made clear of my choice.
 
I actually like the creativity of it all. By no means am I doing as you are suggesting. I am offering my personal thoughts. Majority rules as with anything else. This is fun! Let's keep that going...
troy8d
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 2185
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/10/16 08:10:22
  • Status: online
  • Ribbons : 10
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:21:28 (permalink)
Afterburner

drougnor

I just want to know how anything in the standings has changed, beyond points awarded, to warrant the accusation that winners are being picked by the system?

I had access to the testing that Troy did before he put the system 'live', and the rankings are unchanged.  All he has done is to ensure that some folders who had reported numbers that were FAR lower than they are producing currently are not unbalancing the contest unfairly.

To that point, I've already told him that if I somehow come into the unexpected ability to suddenly out perform my reported ability that I fully EXPECTED him to penalize my overall points production in order to make it more fair for the other teams. 

But, you already clearly stated that you didn't want to discuss this, so I'll leave it at that, as well as leaving this here:

From the contest page
  • (Preliminary) Contestant Adjustment Point System
    • To insure the contest is as competitive as possible, an individual contestants ability to exceed their anticipated contest points will depend on several factors including (margin of deviation, team's performance, and other team's performance).
    • If a number of criteria are met, the contestant will only receive partial credit if they cross a certain threshold.
    • Contestants will never lose contest points for exceeding their projected folding points.  All points and work units produced will improve the contestant's and team's contest points.
    • The system will be sensitive to the unpredictable nature of folding.
    • All contestants will be subject to the exact same criteria.
    • Bottom line: the best way to insure a fair and competitive contest is to give as accurate a prediction as possible and fold as hard as you can throughout the competition.
 

I think you are taking my choice personal Your highlighted portion... And you may want to read my post again. I did not clearly say I did not want to discuss it... I said... Do not send me a PM. Do not try and reason with me. I am not upset. It is a choice I am making as this change has happened.

This is kind of easy to me....

  • Member X claims 25k
  • Member X Does 35k
  • Member X is deducted a mathematical number to reduce 35k back to 25k.
Now...
  • All team now are producing numbers as protected. = Winner was already known before contest as a member did the balancing of the players and the teams and the points change.
 
That is why I think what I said. It is not a big deal at all. Quite the opposite. I am just making a personal choice, just like I did to add production as I got into the fun. Now no one complained or offered disapproval for wanting to do more. Yet because I chose to go back to what I originally predicted I am the bad guy?

I just goofed. it is my mistake. I read everything before we started, and did not see anything about 2012 saying we would have points reduced to meet the original production.

I feel horrible knowing I hurt our team. As I know I cannot keep up the production as I am during the weekends during the week. So no matter what, I am hurting the team.


 



 
I don't mean this in a derogatory way, but this is pure speculation and assumption on your part.  I blame mostly myself for not having posted the details yet, but I am only human...all I ask is for a little patience before making rash assumptions or decisions.  I am in the process of summarizing it.


rjbelans
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
  • Total Posts : 6222
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/11/20 20:23:25
  • Location: N.F., ON, CA
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 31
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:22:09 (permalink)
Afterburner 
 
This is kind of easy to me....

  • Member X claims 25k
  • Member X Does 35k
Member X is deducted a mathematical number to reduce 35k back to 25k.


Ab, I know that this is not what is being done, so lets wait for Troy's details on haw the calculation is being done. I don't know all the details, but from the bit that I have heard I think most people will be please with what he has come up with. It actually does still encourage going full out without completly disregarding the initial estimates and team balancing.
patchesanook
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3900
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2006/02/04 05:54:08
  • Location: in a cave in west virginia
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 9
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:24:43 (permalink)
WHY DO WE CARE ABOUT CONTEST POINTS.
this contest is all about the team getting together.it is to promote folding.i do not care if Madrrias team beats  me or  not,i am just happy with all of the people that fold for this contest.it is not about big numbers,the little guys that fold 24/7 can out produce a big guy that only folds for a contest to try and win a prize. sorry just my take on the contest.



Punchy
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 2872
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/02/06 09:33:05
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 14
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:28:00 (permalink)
It's more like member A claims 25K, does 50K, and gets 35K worth of credits.  The only reason it appears as if there is a deduction is that the system was not in place from the start.
 
It also helps smooth out the effect of bigadv.  For example, I estimated 110K, and dropped a 420K WU after 24 hours.  So, the system would give me credit for somewhere around 150K at that time.  However, a day later, with no more work submitted, I'd have credit for closer to 300K.  After 4 total days with no more work, I'd be at 105K ppd with full credit for all 420K points.  (numbers are estimates)
 
I also understand why Troy may not want to reveal the full formula, because then people will stop when they get close to the threshold.

  
Afterburner
EVGA Forum Moderator
  • Total Posts : 24945
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 14:41:48
  • Location: It's... Classified Yeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaah........
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 108
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:28:08 (permalink)
lol... OMG!!! Why is what my choice made being missed? Let's have a blast! Adjust the points however. I do not care.
 
I cannot produce during the week what I do on the weekends. So any "Single" adjustment would kill my points for our team instead of just being the turtle and doing my 9k.
 
So I HURT my team. At least I am manning up to it! Please do as you wish. Never thought I would cause issues because I owned up to my mistake. That is all.
 
No wonder folks keep leaving this team. Even when we are being up front as to what we did wrong we are tossed about...
Punchy
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 2872
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/02/06 09:33:05
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 14
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:30:55 (permalink)
Afterburner

lol... OMG!!! Why is what my choice made being missed? Let's have a blast! Adjust the points however. I do not care.

I cannot produce during the week what I do on the weekends. So any "Single" adjustment would kill my points for our team instead of just being the turtle and doing my 9k.

So I HURT my team. At least I am manning up to it! Please do as you wish. Never thought I would cause issues because I owned up to my mistake. That is all.

Actually if you overproduce on the weekend and then get back to normal during the week, you'll probably get most of those extra points back by the end of the week.

  
troy8d
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 2185
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/10/16 08:10:22
  • Status: online
  • Ribbons : 10
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:33:31 (permalink)
Afterburner

lol... OMG!!! Why is what my choice made being missed? Let's have a blast! Adjust the points however. I do not care.

I cannot produce during the week what I do on the weekends. So any "Single" adjustment would kill my points for our team instead of just being the turtle and doing my 9k.

So I HURT my team. At least I am manning up to it! Please do as you wish. Never thought I would cause issues because I owned up to my mistake. That is all.

No wonder folks keep leaving this team. Even when we are being up front as to what we did wrong we are tossed about...

 
Under no circumstances does overproducing hurt your team.  Nor does it hurt you as an individual.  You just might not gain the full benefit of extreme overproduction.


rjbelans
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
  • Total Posts : 6222
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/11/20 20:23:25
  • Location: N.F., ON, CA
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 31
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:34:20 (permalink)
Afterburner
lol... OMG!!! Why is what my choice made being missed? Let's have a blast! Adjust the points however. I do not care.

I cannot produce during the week what I do on the weekends. So any "Single" adjustment would kill my points for our team instead of just being the turtle and doing my 9k.

So I HURT my team. At least I am manning up to it! Please do as you wish. Never thought I would cause issues because I owned up to my mistake. That is all.

No wonder folks keep leaving this team. Even when we are being up front as to what we did wrong we are tossed about...


We just want to ensure that you are not misinterpreting things here. You keep saying you "hurt" your team, but you have not, you have given them more points than they would have gotten if you strictly stayed to your production estimate. If you overproduce on one day and underproduce on another, it will even out in the end. It's not a daily adjustment that limits on that specific day, it works to make corrections essentially to the final production at the end of the round, but keeps you informed of where things stand at any given moment.
Gratuitous
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1122
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/03/16 04:30:23
  • Location: California
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 4
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:40:03 (permalink)
Punchy


I also understand why Troy may not want to reveal the full formula, because then people will stop when they get close to the threshold.


yes, I will stop when getting close to the threashold. the point I am making is that if I want to spend an extra $20usd past my comfort level at least if I know the formula I will know that by pushing with that extra $20 donation my team will come out as I wanted it to. make sense? most of us are intellagent enough to figure out these things if they have the proper information to make decisions on. I know my comfort level is donating around $95 usd to this contest. if I think that because the formula will push a win for my team by me donating an extra $20 or $40 then I will do it. but if putting the extra money in won't ultimatly make a differance then I won't. I am already doubling what I nomally do on a month to month basis because of the contest. so no matter if i stop at a threashold or not the project still comes out ahead.

“I built a castle in the swamp and it sunk. I built a second castle and it sunk too. I built a third castle and it burned down and then sunk. But the fourth castle, Ahhhh! That one stood.”
—Monty Python and the Holy Grail
 
Lu523
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 645
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/12/06 08:08:44
  • Location: Covington, GA
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:47:08 (permalink)
 Does it really matter if a team wins or loses? I know bragging rights and all. Take into account what folding is for. We are trying to help out mankind. The points, contest, prizes and EVGA buck are just a bonus for doing what we feel is the right thing.




Gratuitous
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1122
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/03/16 04:30:23
  • Location: California
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 4
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:50:51 (permalink)
Lu523

 Does it really matter if a team wins or loses? I know bragging rights and all. Take into account what folding is for. We are trying to help out mankind. The points, contest, prizes and EVGA buck are just a bonus for doing what we feel is the right thing.


no, in reality it doesnt matter. but I advocate letting everyone decide for themselves what matters and what doesnt. transperancy man. :) fold on im done asking for it. do what you think is best. I'm along for the ride any way it roles.

“I built a castle in the swamp and it sunk. I built a second castle and it sunk too. I built a third castle and it burned down and then sunk. But the fourth castle, Ahhhh! That one stood.”
—Monty Python and the Holy Grail
 
Afterburner
EVGA Forum Moderator
  • Total Posts : 24945
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 14:41:48
  • Location: It's... Classified Yeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaah........
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 108
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:50:51 (permalink)
@ Troy and RJ... Ok cool beans... I understand what you are saying... But as I look at the math in the snapshot below I do understand your thinking, but the math is a little off...
 
Lu523 has 71k and 21 WU's =91.6 points
 
AB Has 118k and 21 WU's = 41 points That is a 50.6 point drop.
 
Another example...
 
L67 has 49k and 9 WU's with 58.1 points... That is 17.1 more points with half the production and almost 1/3 less WU's.
 
Or derek at 28k and 10 WU's = 38.5 points...
 
So by my math if I was only at 18k right now as predicted I would be around 30 points. Much closer to what I see a few moments ago of 34.1 points.
 
This means the extra 100k in production only produced 4.1 extra points. Until this week came and my production dropped and the math continued to drop.
 
This is how I came to my thinking of hurting my team. Unless a person is adjusting as we go to allow for more points as production drops I am hurting my team by my current understanding.
 
So what I should have done was never over produce by these thoughts. I could be offering 96 points right now if I was producing only 71k instead I produced 118k and am giving 41...
 
Man I hope that makes since. I goofed. I hurt our team. If I had estimated 71k the points would be benefiting the team, not hurting it.

Attached Image(s)

Afterburner
EVGA Forum Moderator
  • Total Posts : 24945
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 14:41:48
  • Location: It's... Classified Yeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaah........
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 108
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:54:06 (permalink)
Lu523

 Does it really matter if a team wins or loses? I know bragging rights and all. Take into account what folding is for. We are trying to help out mankind. The points, contest, prizes and EVGA buck are just a bonus for doing what we feel is the right thing.

Yes and no. It is fun for the whole contest, but the true winners are those that benefit from this.
 
I think my voicing my personal mistake was a poor choice.
 
The contest is awesome! My mistake is the issue, not bragging rights. If that is what is being read even though I am going way over the norm to help make sure this is not the issue... It is time for me to stop trying...
rjbelans
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
  • Total Posts : 6222
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/11/20 20:23:25
  • Location: N.F., ON, CA
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 31
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 17:59:36 (permalink)
Afterburner
This is how I came to my thinking of hurting my team. Unless a person is adjusting as we go to allow for more points as production drops I am hurting my team by my current understanding.


I believe Troy's calculation does do this adjusting as we go.
patchesanook
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3900
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2006/02/04 05:54:08
  • Location: in a cave in west virginia
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 9
Re:2012 Offical Folding M@dness Announcements 2012/03/03 18:02:09 (permalink)
i got a stupid question,
why do i have to  say what my points or ppd a day is.
i fold,but i do not check every wu or points every day.
so when i join a contest i have to guess,.
when i fold i do not check my stats everyday or update.i just check to make sure my system is working.
 
you know,
when i am in a contest i just turn on folding.i check it every 12 hours or so.i   go fishing or riding my harley.
i do not sit at my desk and try and compute my folding points.
i estimate my production for a contest by my last 24 hour output.
if they sneak a new wu in im screwed.
but win ,lose , or draw, i am here for my team.



Page: << < ..1112131415.. > >> Showing page 11 of 30
Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile